Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 13 · Page 1 of about 10,932 results (0.281 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 2021

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

have a uniform age, which is relatable to the approximate age by which a public 30 Income Tax Act, 1961, Customs Act, 1962, Securities Exchange of India Act, 1992, Electricity Act, 2003, etc. 16 servant attains the status … law and independence of the judiciary. He argued that the 52 (2019) 13 SCC18549 | Pa ge principle of independence of the judiciary can be … the issues considered in MBA-III was the correctness of the condition imposed in the 2020 Rules that an advocate 53 With effect from 26.05.2017. 57 | Pa ge is eligible for appointment as a Member only if … first proviso and the second proviso, read with the third proviso, to Section 184 (1), Sections 184(7) and 184(11) of the Finance Act, 2017. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2002

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-19-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar … came to be replied by the petitioner by his reply letter dated 13-2-2002 by offering his explanation and also his defence.6. The Bar Council, after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1995

Akhilesh Kumar Misra, and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at A ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-06-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26A, 29, 30, 33 and 49 to 54; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rules 44 and 57A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(9) and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1995All148; [1995(71)FLR92]; (1995)1UPLBEC374

means an advocate entered in any roll under the provision of this Act.'9. Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides that subject to the provisions contained in the said Act and the rules made thereunder, a person … exist in the State roll not deemed as an advocate and provisions of Section 26 applies. - - 13. It may be mentioned here that the High Court as well as the State Bar Council and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 24 2018

Competition Commission of India and Anr vs.oriental Rubber Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-2018

Subject : MRTP

the strength of this decision, he contended that the right to practice under Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 was not an unqualified right and it may be restricted “by law for the time being in force.” … Pronounced on:24. 05.2018 LPA6072016, C.M. APPL.41020/2016 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.…. Appellants Through: Sh. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Balaji Subramanian, Sh. Udayan Verma and Sh. Siddharth Nath, Advocates. versus ORIENTAL RUBBER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED.... … and the application for inspection could not be allowed. The Respondent on 13.08.2015 vide letter to the CCI stated that it had submitted all the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2002

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-04-2002

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

short, 'State Commission') are entitled to be represented by authorised agents who are not enrolled under the Advocates Act, 1961 and such Authorised Agents have the right of audience. The counsel appearing for the parties confined their arguments … Section 12 of the Act of 1986 provides the manner in which the complaint shall be made and Section 13 provides the procedure to be followed by the District Forum on receipt of a complaint from consumer involving … the permission of the authority concerned, he does not practise the profession and contravene Section 33 of the Advocate Act. Section 32 of the said Act in fact permits such appearance notwithstanding the fact that the person concerned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1996

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-17-1996

Subject : Other Taxes

struck down Section 23 of the Madhya Pradesh Act. On September 11, 1961 the Parliament enacted the Act in question, which received the assent of … Court allowed the writ petition holding that the qualifying date for determining the age qualification of voters under Section 13 of the Orissa Municipal Act had been published by the State Government only of 10th January, 1958, though … the petitioners in other writ petitions adopted the arguments noticed above.17. On behalf of the State the learned Advocate General submitted the Section 2(i) of the Ordinance as well as the Act in clear language validated the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1994

Sailendra Kumar Vs. Chairman Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Nov-02-1994

Subject : Civil

the observations contained in this judgment. There will be no order as to costs.N.K. Sinha, J.37. I agree. Advocate Act, 1961, Sections 8 and 8A (as amended by Amendment Act, 1993) - Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 227--Election … electing members of the Bihar State Bar Council. He has challenged the constitutional validity of Sub-section 3 of Section 8A of the Advocates Act (as amended) on the ground that the aforesaid provisions vest arbitrary and unguided … has further impugned the resolution of the Bar Council of India dated 13th February 1994 us also the letter of the Bar Council of India

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1994

Jayanagar 4th T Block Residents Association Vs. Gnyana Mandir Trust

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14(2) and 15; Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965 - Rule 35

Reported in : ILR1995KAR461

for the petitioner invited my attention to provisions of Section 12 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and submitted that there is classification and categorisation of use of land and assigning of the land for … been received.6. I have heard the petitioner's Counsel Shri Lakshminarayana Rao as well as Sri K.S. Desai, Senior Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri H.J. Sunder Kumar and Smt Shobha Patil for respondents 3 to … 18.6.1984. A representation, according to the petitioner has also been made on 13.2.1992 to the Minister for Education. The petitioner has asserted that the sanctioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1963

K.S. Iyer Vs. Bar Council Represented by Its Secretary, H.C. Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-22-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 6 and 7; Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1); Bar Councils Rules - Rule 1VB

Reported in : AIR1964Mad390

recently in the district of Kanyakumari. He applied to She Bar Council under S. 25 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (which will hereafter be referred to as the Act) for admission as an advocate on the State roll. … roll. The Enrolment Committee of the Bar Council not being satisfied with the appellant's qualifications as prescribed by Section 24(1)(c) and (d) of the Act, took action Under Section 26 and by its letter dated 27th June … to practise in the subordinate Courts of Kanyakumari and Tiruuelveli Districts. On 13-11- 1957, the State Government in response to a recommendation from this court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2004

Amarjit Singh Kalra (Through Lrs) and ors. Vs. Smt. Pramod Gupta (Thro ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 - Sections 3 to 16, 15 to 20; Indian Bar Council Rules - Rule 15; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1), 49(1), 50 and 58A; Land Acquisition Act, 1896 - Sections 4 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Punjab Land Revenue Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 6, 6(2) and 7; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Delhi High Court Rules - Rules 3, 4, 11 and 15; High Courts (Punjab) Order, 1947 - Orders 6 and 7; Constitution of India - Article 145

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi41; 99(2004)DLT115; 2004(77)DRJ686

under Section 15 of the Indian Bar Council Act, 1926 deemed to have been adopted under the Advocates Act, 1961. It is contended in the application that the appeal arises out of the judgment and decree made by … B.C. Patel, C.J.1. This matter is concerned with rights of audience of an advocate in the Court. Such a right being in general is governed in this country by practice as well … N.W. 210:148 Iowa, 508; Miller v. Cedar Rapids Sash & Door Co. 134 N.W. 411: 153 Iowa 735.'proper' being synonymous with 'fit'. Hanes v. Southern

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial