Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 12 · Page 1 of about 12,110 results (0.521 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 1986

Rajkot Engineering Association and ors. and Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-31-1986

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A, 40A(3), 44AA, 44AA(2), 44AB, 69D, 131, 132, 132(5), 139(1), 139(9), 139A, 140A, 142, 142(2A), 246, 246(2), 269C, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272, 272A, 272B, 273, 273A(A), 288 and 288(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 6G; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Guj)272; (1987)1GLR3; [1986]162ITR28(Guj)

in which the respective petitioners have moved these petitions challenging the validity of section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which has been placed on the statute book by the Finance Act. 1984, with effect from April 1, … in section 288(2) while discharging their functions and duties under the Act. The authorized representatives comprise mainly of advocates, chartered accountants or commerce graduates as permitted to appear in the proceedings under the Act, Before the impugned … the 1922 Act, or in certain specified territories, are authorised under rule 12A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, to file particulars of accounts, statements or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1961

Panchal Mohanlal Ishwardas Vs. Maheshwari Mills Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-13-1961

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1962)3GLR574

when the hearing of the case concluded before me on 10 October 1961 I indicated to the parties that I was inclined to accept the … Amin learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the defendant was that it was the original Sub-section (3) of Section 12 which applied to the facts of the case and not Sub-section (3)(a) or Sub-section (3)(b) which sub-sections were … and was therefore not entitled to the protection of the Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Act); and secondly the contention was that the plaintiffs bona fide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2015

M. Veerabhadraiah Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2015

Subject : Education

Bengaluru, by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as “the Act”). A direction is also sought to frame rules for designation of senior … MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.36789/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) c/w W.P.No.35106/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P.No.36789/2014 BETWEEN: M. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT58YEARS, ADVOCATE, EN.NO.KAR/453/1986, HAVING OFFICE AT No.141, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 011. ... … M.K., AGED ABOUT40YEARS, ADVOCATE, ENROLLMENT No.KAR/133/1997, PRESENTLY AT: THE ESTATE, LEVEL ONE, 121, DICKENSON ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042.-.:3. :- 8.9. SRI. ADITYA SONDHI, S/O NOT KNOWN,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 1988

P. Venkatamuni Reddi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-04-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34; Andhra Pradesh Advocates Fee Rules - Rule 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Andhra Pradesh Advocate-General (Duties, Leave and Remuneration) Order, 1961 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1989AP45

writ petitions. Advocate's fee Rs. 350/- in each. Civil - right of advocate - Section 34 of Advocates Act, 1961 and Rule 12 (2) of Advocate Fee Rules - Advocate General appeared on behalf Government as respondent -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 1978

Bhiwa Yeshwant Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-1978

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 32 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR361; 1978MhLJ589

view prima facie that this is a fit case for action against Mr. J.R. Pandey under the Advocates Act, 1961, section 45 of which runs as follows :'Any person who practises in any Court or before any authority or … of the Madras High Court in Krishnammal v. Balasubramaniam I.L.R. 1938 Mad 12, and two decisions of the Calcutta High Court, one in Hurchand Ray … placed before the Court for admission, the board in that behalf showing Mr. J.R. Pandey as being the Advocate for the appellant.3. When the matter was first called out on April 18, 1978, Mr. Pandey appeared and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1974

Joginder Singh Vs. the Bar Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 26(1) and 26(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 20(2);

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi192; 1975RLR15

practiced at Shaharanpur. He then applied to the Bar Council of India under section 18 of the Advocates Act 1961 for the transfer of his name from the roll of the U.P. Bar Council to that of the … T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) The appellant, Joginder Singh, was once an advocate. His grievance is that his name has been struck off the rolls. (2) On 28th March, 1962 he … Punjab High Court, the Bar Council of India sent a notice dated 12th January, 1965 to the appellant saying : 'WHEREASit has been brought to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1994

Jayanagar 4th T Block Residents Association Vs. Gnyana Mandir Trust

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14(2) and 15; Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965 - Rule 35

Reported in : ILR1995KAR461

for the petitioner invited my attention to provisions of Section 12 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and submitted that there is classification and categorisation of use of land and assigning of the land for … been received.6. I have heard the petitioner's Counsel Shri Lakshminarayana Rao as well as Sri K.S. Desai, Senior Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri H.J. Sunder Kumar and Smt Shobha Patil for respondents 3 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2004

Gopal Jalan Vs. O.L. of Jalan Ispat Casting Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : SICA

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466; Sick Industrial Company (Special Provision) Act, 1985 - Sections 20(1); Dues Recoveries Act, 1961

Reported in : [2006]130CompCas551(Guj); [2005]58SCL469(Guj)

arrears of electricity dues to the tune of Rs. 3,12,64,250/-. As per the Provisions contained in Dues Recoveries Act, 1961, the debts of MPSEB can be recovered as per the procedure prescribed in the said Act. A recovery … making it returnable on 15.06.2004. On 15.06.2004, when the matter was placed for hearing, Mr. T.R. Mishra, learned advocate appearing on behalf of some of the workers of the Company in liquidation has submitted that the workers … the Registrar, BIFR on 27.03.2002 in BIFR Case No. 126/97 (II) under section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the reasons stated in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2016

G. Ramachar and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka, Rep. By Its Chief S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-18-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

issue survey sketch or land survey map as per prescribed Form-11-E); 4) Sec. 81-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (to declare in the prescribed format by the purchaser as they are agriculturists and having no excess land … property only, but also documents dealing with other matters such as adoption. 12. In sub-section (1) of Section 22A of the Act, the State Government … merit in the writ petition. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent - State and perused the material on record. They have also submitted their written arguments … as the "Amendment Act" for the sake of brevity) inter alia, incorporating Section 22A of the Act. The amendment Act No.55/1976 has received the assent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1976

Udayan Chinubhai and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-27-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5

Reported in : [1978]111ITR584(Guj)

not covered by any other head of income under Act of 1922. Under section 56(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income from dividends had been specifically made chargeable as income which is to be computed under the head … family. Under the terms of the consent decree, Shri K. M. Munshi, advocate, was appointed the sole arbitrator and it was director by the court … case, the Tribunal was right in holding that such interest as was disallowed was not admissible deduction under section 12(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (3) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial