Advanced Search Results

Panineeya Law College, Represented by Its President D.N. Sastry and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Institutions of Law (Regulation of Admissions into Courses in Law through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1989 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 8; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1) and 15; Bar Council of India Rules, 1982; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1) and 49(1); University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 12A; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 245, 246 and 254; Universities Grants Commission (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT389

We summarise and formulate them as under:(i) Provisions of Section 7(1)(h) and Section 49(1)(af) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, enacted by the Parliament under Entries 77 and 78 of List I of Seventh Schedule of … summarise and formulate them as under:(i) Provisions of Section 7(1)(h) and Section 49(1)(af) and (d) of the Advocates Act, 1961, enacted by the Parliament under Entries 77 and 78 of List I of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution … the Government of Andhra Pradesh in G.O.Ms. No. 172, Education (Rules), dated 11th May, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'The LAWCET Rules'), made in exercise

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. A.A. Bibijiwala Trust

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 11(1)

Reported in : [1975]100ITR516(Guj)

of the case, the trusts are wholly religious and entitled to exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?' 2. We may point out that, though the question has been framed in connection with the trusts … long time. As far back as 1922, in a well-known decision in this branch of the law in Advocate-General of Bombay v. Yusufalli, Marten J. of the Bombay High Court examined the entire material before him and

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … ABOUT58YEARS SON OF SRI RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014 … KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26589/2014 C/W W.P.NOS.3476-3479/2014 & 5661-5665/2014, 3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014, 6918-6938/2014, 11889-11890/2014, 12097-12121/2014, 13065-13074/2014, 14294- 14295/2014 & 30565-30567/2014, 14296-14297/2014 & 29363-29365/2014, 14669/2014 & 15513-15514/2014,

Bar Council of India Vs. High Court of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 19, 30, 34, 34(1), 35, 35(1), 36 and 49; Kerala Advocates Rules - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 129, 142, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 345 and 346; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 175, 178, 179, 180 and 228

Reported in : AIR2004SC2227; 2004(3)ALD115(SC); 2004(3)ALT53(SC); [2004(3)JCR97(SC)]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC428; 2004(2)KLT485(SC); 2004(5)SCALE232; (2004)6SCC311; 2004(2)LC1243(SC)

in this writ petition.BACKGROUND FACT:2. The Bar Council of India is a statutory body constituted under the Advocates Act, 1961 ('the Act'). In terms of Section 34(1) of the Act, the High Court of Kerala framed rules; Rule … S.B. Sinha, J.INTRODUCTION:1. Constitutionality of Rule 11 of the Rules framed by the High Court of Kerala forbidding a … v. Union of India and Anr. : [1998]2SCR795 , that as in terms of the provisions of the Advocate Act, the Bar Council of India is entitled to punish an Advocate counsel for commission of misconduct - whether

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. Ahmedabad, Millowne ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 11, 11(1) and 11(4)

Reported in : [1977]106ITR725(Guj)

a trust for a charitable purpose, as contemplated by section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as ' the Act', and whether its income for the year 1963 is assessable to … middlemen, who were already working for different mills. During the course of hearing of this reference, the learned Advocate-General, who appeared on behalf of the association, produced with the agreement of the other side, a copy of

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mayur Foundation

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct TaxationTrusts and Societies

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 11, 11(2), 139(1), 139(1), 254 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 17

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)197; [2005]274ITR562(Guj)

Ahmedabad Bench 'C', Ahmedabad has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for the opinion of this Court at the instance of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot.'Whether … case, the Tribunal was right in holding that in the absence of any specific time limit prescribed Under Section 11(2) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for submission of the notice in the prescribed manner to the assessing authority, … under Section 11(2) of the Act.7. Mr. Manish J. Shah, the learned advocate for the respondent assessee read extensively from the order of the Tribunal

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

advocate of a High Court' in Article 217(2)(b) have no significance after coming into force of the Advocates Act, 1961 ('1961 Act' for short), which lays down that, after the 1961 Act, there are only two classes of … when the practice of advocates was governed by Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 ('1926 Act' for short). Under Section 2 of that Act, 'an advocate' was defined to mean 'an advocate entered in the roll of advocates … petition) came to this Court by way of Transfer Petition (C) No. 1186 of 2008. By Order dated 18.2.2009, which is a speaking order, this

Jaldacca Tea Plantations Private Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

Subject : Land Acquisition

till August 5, 1992, for deposit of 50 per cent. of the tax. On August 11, 1992, an advocate's letter was sent to respondent No. 3, demanding justice and expressing willingness to deposit 50 per cent, of … for the year 1985-86, under Section 24(3) of the Act. Since there was no assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961, applicant No. 1 could not file a certified copy of the order of assessment under the Income-tax Act,

Deviram and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 34, 34(1) and 58AG; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 41(1); Constitution of India - Article 145; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 34(2); ;Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders - Sections 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT182

functional and workable construction of the Rule.10. Presently, we shall proceed to state the provision contained in the Advocates Act, 1961, Section 34 of the aforesaid Act reads as under :-'34. Power of High Courts to make … and workable construction of the Rule.10. Presently, we shall proceed to state the provision contained in the Advocates Act, 1961, Section 34 of the aforesaid Act reads as under :-'34. Power of High Courts to make rules.- (1) The

Shambhu Sharan Vs. Ranchi University and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

and all the legal practitioners have been classified as an Advocate. The Consolidated Act was named as Advocates Act, 1961. Section 3 of the said Act provides that there shall be a Bar Council for each of the State … 1990-91 i.e., when the college was not affiliated. A writ application was filed in 1992 being C.W.J.C. No. 1147 of 1992 (R) by the students of the college and in that writ application a specific stand was