Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 10 · Page 1 of about 13,008 results (0.268 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 31 1994

Jayanagar 4th T Block Residents Association Vs. Gnyana Mandir Trust

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14(2) and 15; Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965 - Rule 35

Reported in : ILR1995KAR461

for the petitioner invited my attention to provisions of Section 12 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and submitted that there is classification and categorisation of use of land and assigning of the land for … the like including Doctors' consultation rooms, Offices of Advocate and other professions. 10. The learned Counsel for the respondent further submitted that the building has … been received.6. I have heard the petitioner's Counsel Shri Lakshminarayana Rao as well as Sri K.S. Desai, Senior Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri H.J. Sunder Kumar and Smt Shobha Patil for respondents 3 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2015

M. Veerabhadraiah and Another Vs. The Union of India, By Its Secretary ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ann-A and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of … and B respectively and declare that same is not within the consonance of the Sec.16(2) of the Advocates Act 1961 and etc., This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying … by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as "the Act"). … the Bar. As a result, one more Full Court was convened on 10/07/2014 and eleven more advocates were designated as senior advocates once again, without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1998

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … tends to interfere with, or obstructs or tends to obstruct, the administration of justice in any other manner.' Section 10 provides:-'Sec. 10. Power of High Court to punish contempts of subordinate courts. - Every High Court shall have … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 18 2015

M. Veerabhadraiah Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2015

Subject : Education

Bengaluru, by which, the private respondent-advocates have been designated as senior advocates under Section 16 of the advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred to as “the Act”). A direction is also sought to frame rules for designation of senior … MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.36789/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) c/w W.P.No.35106/2014 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P.No.36789/2014 BETWEEN: M. VEERABHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT58YEARS, ADVOCATE, EN.NO.KAR/453/1986, HAVING OFFICE AT No.141, 1ST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, 27TH CROSS, 3RD BLOCK EAST, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 011. ... … the Bar. As a result, one more Full Court was convened on 10/07/2014 and eleven more advocates were designated as senior advocates once again, without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1985

indra Bahadur Singh Vs. Bar Council of U.P., Allahabad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-1985

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 34, 49 and 49(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 220; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1986All56

and 21 of the Rules framed by the Bar Council of India under Section 49(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961 regulating professional conduct and etiquette specifically lay down that an Advocate shall not stipulate for a fee contingent … 1984, and started practice as an advocate in the Board of Revenue.2. Subsequently a complaint was made on 10th Feb. 1985 by Shri Jagdish Kishore Pathak, a member of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1979

Sarjeet Singh Bhangul Vs. Bar and Council of Delhi ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1979

Subject : Election

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 3(4)

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi263; 1979RLR324

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section … Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section (2) or … Section 3(2) makes a reservation in favor of advocates having at least 10 years' standing so that about half the number of members of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2024

Sri. Paras Jain Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-07-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

the matter, I deem it appropriate to consider the same at the outset. Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 deals with punishment of advocates for misconduct and reads as follows: “35. Punishment of advocates for misconduct.―(1) Where … territory of Delhi, mean the Additional Solicitor General of India.” (Emphasis supplied) 10 Section 35 directs that on receipt of a complaint or otherwise a … 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.20076 OF2023(GM - RES) BETWEEN: SRI PARAS JAIN ADVOCATE S/O LATE SRI. P.BHAWARLAL DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT71YEARS R/AT38 5TH CROSS GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. ... PETITIONER (BY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2004

Bharatiya Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. Vs. Kri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1996 - Sections 1(3) and 33; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 94(2)

Reported in : AIR2004Bom387; 2004(2)ALLMR340; 2004(5)BomCR196; 2004(2)MhLj810

contended on behalf of the petitioner's that in terms of the provisions of law contained in the Advocates Act, 1961 read with the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 as well as the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies … Act or in any other law for the time being in force. Section 33 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is very clear in that regard, … Application No. 673 of 2003 permitting the respondent No. 1 to plead through his attorney instead of an advocate, is sought to be challenged in this petition. The notice of the hearing of the matter was issued … referring to Order III, Rules 1 and 2 as well as Clause X of Letters Patent and Section 8 of the Bar Councils Act, 1926

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1990

Hari Om Rajender Kumar and Others Vs. Chief Rationing Officer of Civil ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-16-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 119 and 122 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 4, Rules 5 and 32; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 24, 24-A, 29, 30, 32, 32A, 33 and 45; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 2, 3, IV, 6-C(II) and VII; Untouchability (Offences) Act; Bar Councils Act - Sections 8 and 49(1); Legal Practitioners Act - Sections 10; Solicitors Act, 1860 - Sections 26; Supreme Court Rules - Order 12, Rule 9; Solicitors Act, 1843 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1990AP340

Civil Rules of Practice. It was, however, pointed out to the G.P.A. that S. 32 of the Advocates Act, 1961 requires permission to be sought by any person other than the party or the advocate for appearing and … to submit oneself to jurisdiction'. It was further held that clauses 9, 10 of the Letters Patent (Madras), and Ss. 119 and 122, C.P.C., Sec. … for directing the respondent to pay the amount of Rs. l,87,502.70ps. with interest at 18% p.a. as per Section 6-C(II) of the Essential Commodifies Act and also for payment of compensation.2. At the time of admission of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1975

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. Mihir Textiles Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-11-1975

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1), 28, 34(3), 37, 37(1), 37(2) and 279; Town Planning Act, 1954

Reported in : [1976]104ITR167(Guj)

of the Bombay Town Planning Act,1954, is not allowable as a deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and hence question No. (1) referred to us in the present case must be answered in the negative … in Income-tax Reference No. 9 of 1974, decided by us on November 10, 1975. For the reasons stated by us in that judgment, it must … the goods can be claimed as a business expenditure. It is true, as pointed out by the learned Advocate-General appearing for the assessee, that the main controversy before the Supreme Court in Haji Aziz and Abdul Shakoor

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial