Advanced Search Results

Naraindas Indurkhya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Prathamik, Middle School Tatha Madhyamik Shiksha (Pathya Pustakon Sambandhi Vyavastha) Adhiniyam, 1973 - Section 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 162

Reported in : AIR1974SC1232,1973(0)BLJR171,1974MPLJ729(SC),(1974)4SCC788,[1974]3SCR624

Legislature. This Act came into force on 23rd March, 1973 being the date appointed under Sub-section (3) of Section 1. The provisions of this Act are material and we may refer to them. Section 2, Clause (e) defines … implication confers power or the Board to prescribe text books. It was not seriously disputed by the learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondents that the Board has no power to prescribe text books generally

Damordardass Agarwal and ors. Vs. R. Badrilal and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 170, 171 and 217; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(1)

Reported in : AIR1987AP254

retain papers till the fee is paid, he is not guilty of professional misconduct. Now under the Advocates Act, 1961, the disciplinary jurisdiction over advocates is exclusively conferred on the statutory authority which is the Bar Council of … engage another advocate to conduct these cases. In the said applications respondent 1 is the party-defendant and respondent 2 is the counsel whose appointment is … by the Court under O. 3 R. 4, C.P.C., while granting leave to terminate the appointment of an advocate previously made. (2) Whether an advocate had lien over the papers of his client entrusted to him during … or attorney of any High Court, a pleader, mukhtar or revenue agent'. Section 4 of the Act recognises the right of the legal practitioners to

R.D. Saxena Vs. Balram Prasad Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 36B and 38; Solicitors Act, 1860; Limitations of Actions Act, 1958; Constitution of India - Article 22(1); Constitution of India - Article 22(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148 and 171; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7), 76 to 123

Reported in : AIR2000SC3049; 2001ALLMR(Cri)375(SC); 2000(5)ALT1(SC); 2001(1)BLJR174; 2000(3)CTC757; JT2000(9)SC432; 2000(3)KLT438(SC); 2000MPLJ613(SC); 2000(6)SCALE42; (2000)7SCC264; [20; AIR 2000 SC 2912

- without any delay. This appeal is filed by the said advocate under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.2. As the question involved in this appeal has topical importance for the legal profession we heard learned Counsel … issue, has chosen to impose punishment on a delinquent advocate debarring him from practicing for a period of 18 months and a fine of Rs. 1000/-. The advocate concerned was further directed to return all the case

P. Venkatamuni Reddi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 34; Andhra Pradesh Advocates Fee Rules - Rule 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Andhra Pradesh Advocate-General (Duties, Leave and Remuneration) Order, 1961 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1989AP45

writ petitions. Advocate's fee Rs. 350/- in each. Civil - right of advocate - Section 34 of Advocates Act, 1961 and Rule 12 (2) of Advocate Fee Rules - Advocate General appeared on behalf Government as respondent - … Government. Sri P. Ramachandra Reddy, the then Advocate General requested the Government in his letter dt. Mar., 27, 1978 to appoint two junior counsel and pursuant thereto, the Government issued G.O.Ms. No. 813 Revenue, dt. May 15,

B. Shivakumar Vs. Govt. of A.P., Law Department, Hyderabad and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 233(1 and 2); Advocate (Right to taking Law Teaching) Rules, 1979 - Rule 3; Bar Council of India Rules, 1961 - Rules 49, 51 and 70; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49(A); University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD528; 1999(3)ALT389

filling up the application filed for appointment. He has also stated that under Section 49(A) of the Advocates Act 1961, (he Central Government framed the Rules called 'The Advocates (Right to take up law teaching) Rules 1979 which … had obtained BL degree from Sri Venkateswara University in the year 1987. He got himself enrolled as an Advocate on the rolls of the A.P. State Bar Council on 24-4-1987. He started his practice in Kavali by … petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not appointing him to the post of District and Sessions

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … hundred rupees for every day during which failure continues. (2) The amount of fee referred to in sub- Section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount … PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3,

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2042

of law with promptitude.'9. It is notable that the 'Illness slip' normally submitted is not recognised under the Advocate Act, 1961 as well as Bar Council of India Rules and U.P. Bar Council Rules and under the Allahabad High … (Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bijnor, District Bijnor). The respondent No. 5 (Raj Pal Singh) filed an application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of the compensation awarded by respondent No. 2 and in … R.B. Misra, J.1. This case was heard on 15.9.1999 by this Court and after hearing the Court has been pleased to

Joginder Singh Vs. the Bar Council of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 26(1) and 26(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 20(2);

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi192; 1975RLR15

practiced at Shaharanpur. He then applied to the Bar Council of India under section 18 of the Advocates Act 1961 for the transfer of his name from the roll of the U.P. Bar Council to that of the … T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) The appellant, Joginder Singh, was once an advocate. His grievance is that his name has been struck off the rolls. (2) On 28th March, 1962 he

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Karnataka State Bar Council and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 35(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Kant410; ILR2002KAR3918; 2003(4)KarLJ219

J.1. A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by … A complaint filed by one Sri J. Gopal son of late Sri Jatappa under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961, against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Bar Council is referred to the disciplinary committee by the Bar

Jitender @ Kalla versus State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1933

in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023) 8 SCC 1 for the designation of Senior Advocates require reconsideration in light of the experience gained and concerns expressed.(b) Whether the inclusion of members of the … members of the Bar in the PermanentCommittee for designation is legally permissible under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which confers the power of designation exclusively on the Supreme Court and High Courts.(c) Whether advocates practising in