Advanced Search Results
Thresia and anr. Vs. Kochuthommen
Kerala
Sep-24-1990
Family
Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 29, 32 and 53; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 213 and 391
AIR1991Ker337
is whether merely on the strength of certificate issued by the Administrator General under Section 29 of the Administrators General Act, 1963 but without obtaining a probate from the District Court under the provisions of Part IX of the Indian … 1956 shall be taken to supersede or affect the rights, duties and privileges of any Administrators General. Section 64(1) repeals the Administrators General Act, 1913.7. An examination of the relevant provisions of the Administrators General Act reveals
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGobald Motor Services (P.) Ltd., Mettupalayam Vs. Regional Transport A ...
Chennai
Jan-10-1968
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47, 47(1), 47(3), 48, 57 and 57(2)
AIR1969Mad441; (1969)2MLJ574
Section 57."6-7. In Abdul Mateen v. Ramkailash, AIR 1963 SC 64 at pp. 67 and 68 which … the permit was granted under Section 48, appeal against the order granting the permit under the provisions of Section 64 (1) (f). In that case it was held that the existing operators would not be persons aggrieved entitling … Section 57 (3). It is said that consideration of the matter under Section 47 (3) is purely for administrative convenience and the matter can be fully gone into while considering applications under Section 57 (3).4. It is … of W. P. 1994 (1984?) of 1967 and discuss the principles applicable generally.2. The appellant in W. A. 264 of 1967, is operating one bus … common question, the place of Section 47 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act in the scheme of the Act for the grant of permit for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjanta Pharma Limited Vs. Allergan Inc. and Others
Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Aug-08-2013
Education
"... we would refer to the discussion... had with the Learned Controller General of Patent and Design………….. Pursuant thereto, it has been settled that the … extremely critical for the Hon'ble IPAB to exercise its discretionary power and apply Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the present revocation petition. He relied on Bayer AG vs. Controller of Patents (AIR 1982 Calcutta 30), … submitted that the Applicant chose not to file either post grant opposition proceedings or even revocation proceedings under Section 64 of the Indian Patents Act within three years from the date of grant of the patent but moved … whether this combination was obvious in view of simultaneous (five minute gap) administration of these known drugs referred to as serial, adjunct or noncommittal or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Estate of V.L. Ethiraj (by Official Tru ...
Chennai
Apr-12-1979
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 160(1), 161, 161(1) and 168; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6)
(1980)16CTR(Mad)238; [1979]120ITR271(Mad)
Act and the Administrators-General Act under which the assessee is exercising his powers. Section 7 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, directs that letters of administration shall be granted to the Administrator-General unless they are granted to the next-of-kin
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Begum Shanti Tufail Ahmad Khan an Application for Grant of Prob ...
Allahabad
Dec-06-2005
Family
Courts of Wards Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Schedule - Article 137; Indian Limitation Act, 1901 - Schedule - Article 181; Indian Succession Act, 1923 - Sections 141; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 48; Mullah's Principles of Mohamdan Laws - Sections 117 and 118; Muslim Law
AIR2006All75
petition for probate. Sri J. Nagar, Administrator General states that in the circumstances Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963 would be applicable, which is residuary clause and provides that for any other application for which no period … to Sri Ruikom Deen son of Sri Badruddin, alleged to be the only surviving next kith and kin. Administrator General, Board of Revenue, U.P. and to be published in the news paper. The advertisement was carried out … 151, Hon'ble S.B. Sinha, J (as he then was) held relying upon Section 118 of Mullah's principles of Mahomedan Law that a Mahomedan cannot by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhazan Chand and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-09-1984
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Articles 1, 14, 246, 265 and 370; Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 4, 6, 7(2), 8, 8B, 8(1), 8(2) and 8(3); Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir - Sections 5; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954
AIR1984SC762; 1984(1)SCALE264; (1984)2SCC456; [1984]2SCR858; [1984]56STC214(SC); 1984(16)LC394(SC)
(1), (2) and (3) of Section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962 (J & K Act XX of 1962) and … the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, (substituted for the original Section 64-A by the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act, 1963, under which unless a different intention appears from the terms of the contract, in the event of any … is federal in its structute and a salient feature of a federal polity is distribution of legislative and administrative powers between the federated unit and the federating units, that is, between the federal government and the State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Mohan and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-17-2004
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23(1A), 23(2), 28 and 34
(2005)140PLR439
Matched in: Advocate Sudhir Mittal,; Vinod S. Bhardwaj,; Ashok Khuber,; Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. General and; Mukul Aggarwal, Adv.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Advocates Association Bengaluru Vs. The Chief Secretary
Karnataka
Aug-11-2022
Land Acquisition
Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … for a writ of certiorari to quash the 64 Government Order dated 14.3.2016 constituting ACB so also … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Sidharth Bhupal Shingadi, Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Aug-11-2022
Land Acquisition
Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … for a writ of certiorari to quash the 64 Government Order dated 14.3.2016 constituting ACB so also … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChidananda Urs B.g Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Aug-11-2022
Land Acquisition
Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … for a writ of certiorari to quash the 64 Government Order dated 14.3.2016 constituting ACB so also … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »