Advanced Search Results

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

the learned counsel for the petitioner, it would be convenienl to refer to the relevant provisions of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 6 of the Administrators General Act (the … Buddisl, Sikh or Jaina where such wills are of the clauses specified in clauses (a) & (b) of Section 57, and (ii) In the case of Wills made by any Parsi dying after the commencement of the Indian

Smt. Bindu Garg Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 47A

Reported in : (1999)122PLR794

and this Court ultimately fixed the market value at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per square yards. In Administrator General of West Bengal's case (supra) this court upheld rejection of the small plots of lands and accepted … the notification Ex.P.36 under Section 4 of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was issued on January 5, 1978. As such the sale instances do not reflect a fair market value

M/s. Jitendra R. Gandhi Vs. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the said case, the assessee's contention was that Entry No.116A and 116D under Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 referred to “copper” and “zinc” and not copper sheets and brass sheets which according to the assessee would … legally justified in holding that the Administrative Asstt. Commissioner was legally justified in assuming the revisional jurisdiction under section 57, despite the appeals against the very assessment orders being pending under section 55 before the Appellate Asstt. Commissioner … Tax Act, 1959, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the Administrative Asstt. Commissioner was legally justified in assuming the revisional jurisdiction under section

Rajayya Bosi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 17 and 29(2)

Reported in : 96(2003)CLT230; 2003(II)OLR211

the Tribunal was that the petitioner's representations were rejected by the Director General and since he was not confirmed in the post of Inspector of … Reforms Act, 1965. It was contended in that case that in view of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963 the Tribunal can condone delay, After construing Section 57A(3) this Court observed as follows :'The proviso to Section … R.K. Patra, J.1. In this writ petition the legality of the order dated 26.2.1998 made by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Review Application No. 54 of 1994 is under challenge. Following are the two points which arise … points raised on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner filed O.A. No. 577 of 1992 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench (hereinafter referred to

T.K.Natarajan vs T.K.Raman Achari

Court : Kerala

of the assets of the deceased or a certificate granted under Section 31 or 32 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 with respect to the debt mentioned therein or a Succession Certificate granted under Part X of the Act … Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh or Jaina where such wills are of the classes specified in clauses(a) and (b) of section 57; and(ii) in the case of wills made by anyParsi dying, after the commencement of the Indian Succession (Amendment)

Brij Mohan and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23(1A), 23(2), 28 and 34

Reported in : (2005)140PLR439

Matched in: Advocate Sudhir Mittal,; Vinod S. Bhardwaj,; Ashok Khuber,; Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. General and; Mukul Aggarwal, Adv.

Chidananda Urs B.g Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By … AT SADYOJATHA, 3RD MAIN, ASHOK NAGAR, TUMKUR - 572102. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI C. V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE) 18

Sri. K.t. Nagaraja Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By … AT SADYOJATHA, 3RD MAIN, ASHOK NAGAR, TUMKUR - 572102. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI C. V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE) 18

Sri T N Rangaswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By … AT SADYOJATHA, 3RD MAIN, ASHOK NAGAR, TUMKUR - 572102. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI C. V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE) 18

Sri. Basavaraj Alias Sachin Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) 5 AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, MULTISTOREYED BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 3 … short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By … AT SADYOJATHA, 3RD MAIN, ASHOK NAGAR, TUMKUR - 572102. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI C. V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE) 18