Advanced Search Results
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...
Delhi
Aug-04-2016
Education
the Constitution and in supersession of all previous orders on the subject, the President hereby directs that the Administrators of all Union Territories other than Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram (whether known as Administrator, Chief Commissioner or Lieutenant … Cabinet system of Government adopted by our Constitution. Under this system, the general rule is that the exercise of executive functions by the Administrator has … also the submission of Mr Jethmalani must be rejected." 103. Section 44(1) of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 which is pari materia with Article 239AA(4) may be reproduced hereunder for ready reference: "44. Council of Ministers.-(1) … should be taken to give such direction as he deems necessary. Rule 52 further provides that where a direction has been given by the Lt.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Ravichandran Transports Mettur Dam, Salem District Vs. United Ind ...
Chennai
Feb-03-2000
Insurance
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 -- Sections 20; Marine Insurance Company Act, 1963 -- Sections 2, 3, 4 (2), 17, 52, 53, 79 & 90; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 6, 135-A; Carriers' Act; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 -- Article 47A
2000(1)CTC748; (2000)IIMLJ318
of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in United India Fire & General Insurance Company Limited v. Palaniappa Transport Carriers and another, : AIR1986AP32 . … Act. I have already noticed in this case that after the coming into force of the Marine Insurance Act, 1963. section 135-A of the Transfer of Property Act stands repealed and consequently stands incorporated in the Marine Insurance Act … favour of the insurer as well as appointing the insurer as the power agent of the insured. Under section 52(3) of the 1963 Act a Marine Policy may be assigned by endorsement thereon or in any other customary … the goods were carried for transit by land alone by a Railway Administration and the question was as to whether the insurer, who had paid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavichandran Transports Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited
Chennai
Feb-03-2000
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
2(2000)ACC69
of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Limited v. Palaniappa Transport Carriers and Anr. : AIR1986AP32 . … Act. I have already noticed in this case that after the coming into force of the Marine Insurance Act, 1963, Section 135-A of the Transfer of Property Act stands repealed and consequently stands incorporated in the Marine Insurance Act … favour of the insurer as well as appointing the insurer as the power agent of the insured. Under Section 52(3) of the 1963 Act a Marine Policy may be assigned by endorsement thereon or in any other customary … the goods were carried for transit by land alone by a Railway Administration and the question was as to whether the insurer, who had paid
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Begum Shanti Tufail Ahmad Khan an Application for Grant of Prob ...
Allahabad
Dec-06-2005
Family
Courts of Wards Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Schedule - Article 137; Indian Limitation Act, 1901 - Schedule - Article 181; Indian Succession Act, 1923 - Sections 141; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 48; Mullah's Principles of Mohamdan Laws - Sections 117 and 118; Muslim Law
AIR2006All75
petition for probate. Sri J. Nagar, Administrator General states that in the circumstances Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963 would be applicable, which is residuary clause and provides that for any other application for which no period … to Sri Ruikom Deen son of Sri Badruddin, alleged to be the only surviving next kith and kin. Administrator General, Board of Revenue, U.P. and to be published in the news paper. The advertisement was carried out … unless the heirs consent thereto after the death by the testator. Para 52, 53, 63 to 72 of the judgment are quoted as below;52. Any … 151, Hon'ble S.B. Sinha, J (as he then was) held relying upon Section 118 of Mullah's principles of Mahomedan Law that a Mahomedan cannot by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOta Falloons Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Trustees at the Port of ...
Kolkata
Jul-19-1988
Civil
Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Section 52; ;Major Port Trusts Rules
1988(17)ECC298,1992(61)ELT185(Cal)
Bholanath Sen and Mr. Samaraditya Pal, the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners have mainly argued that under Section 52 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 every Scale of Rates and every statement of conditions framed by … not cleared within the month from the date of landing at Haldia General Cargo Berth. The copy of the said circular is annexed to the … and without jurisdiction. Under the extant provisions of law and/or the rules framed under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 rates relating to Scale of Rates (Schedule of Charges) will govern the rates pertaining to rent and other … Port Authorities for certain Major Ports in India and to vest the administration, control and management of such ports by any such authorities and for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Bindu Garg Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-10-1999
Civil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 47A
(1999)122PLR794
and this Court ultimately fixed the market value at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per square yards. In Administrator General of West Bengal's case (supra) this court upheld rejection of the small plots of lands and accepted … the notification Ex.P.36 under Section 4 of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was issued on January 5, 1978. As such the sale instances do not reflect a fair market value
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimpson and Co. Limited Vs. Joint Commissioner of Labour and ors.
Chennai
Jan-07-1977
Labour and Industrial
(1977)ILLJ161Mad
'made' on 19-5-1976.(vi) The first respondent ought to have seen that on general principles, even if it is assumed that the defects pointed out were … 1956 (31 of 1956), or the Agricultural Refinance Corporation established under Section 3 of the Agricultural Refinance Corporation Act, 1963 (10 of 1963) or the Deposit Insurance Corporation established under Section 3 of the Deposit Insurance Corporation Act, … in In re The Delhi Lawn Act. 1912, etc., : [1951]2SCR747 ; Rajnarain Sinqh v. The Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, Patna and Anr. : [1955]1SCR290 ; and The State of Bombay and Anr. v. The United Motors
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.Ekambaram Vs. Bhavani Sagari
Chennai
Apr-10-2013
Land Acquisition
Judge has also dealt with a case with reference to Sections 22 and 28(3) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, in the light of the decisions cited. In our … of List II provided under the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976. The general jurisdiction of the High Court falls in administration of justice under Entry … learned counsel appearing for the respondent herein that as per the Tamil Nadu Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.97, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (Election), dated 19.07.2011, the entire Kathirvedu village has been brought within the Chennai Corporation limits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Gangadhar Shedge and Others Vs. Ramesh Gangadhar Shedge, Since D ...
Mumbai
Jun-09-2014
Land Acquisition
India Act, 1992 (vi) The Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulations of the Promotion of Construction, Sale Management and Transfer) Act, 1963. 39. In paragraph 36, after considering the observations made in paragraphs 52 and 53 of Pushpalatha'scase, the Division … (A.I.R. 2010 Karnataka 27); 7. Pushpalatha N. V. Vs. V. Padma (A.I.R.2010 Karnataka 124); 8. Mahadfolal Kondia Vs. Administrator General of West Bengal (A.I.R.1960 S.C.936); 9. SadashivSakharam Patil and Ors; 10. Bijender Singh Vs. State of Haryana … no.3 in-person in S.A.No.566 of 2011, at length. 2. The question whether Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short 'Principal Act') as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.P. Paul Vs. C.P. Susan and ors.
Kerala
Jul-06-1999
Family
Kerala High Court Act, 1959 - Sections 5; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 4; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276
AIR1999Ker415
v. Shri Dhar, AIR 1960 All 692 : (1960 All LJ 387) (FB) and R. C. Pawell v. Administrator General, AIR 1967 All 231 : (1967 All LJ 536). 4. Then the question is, what is the … Bench of this Court in Chacko v. Catholic Bank of India Ltd., 1963 Ker LT 1068 : (AIR 1964 Ker 181). In that case, the … specific provision in Article 4 of Schedule I of the Court Fees Act. The Full Bench held that Section 52 of the Court Fees Act providing for payment of Court fee on appeals as the same as that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »