Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 48 · Page 1 of about 2,145 results (0.146 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2008

The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu High Cour ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-20-2008

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1913 - Sections 20; Administrators General (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 25; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 30, 31(2) and 48B; Companies Act - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680

Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated … the respondent/Housing Board for a public purpose, viz. Housing scheme by the respondent/Board, for which, a notice under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 30.10.1985, an enquiry under Section 5A of the Land … by deleting or re-conveying the land by exercising the power under Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act.6.3. Thereafter, the said W.P. No. 37212 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

the market comcommittee with the approval of the director (section 22).(viii) Supervision of market comcommittee by the administrator (section 48) (viii) Issue of general or special directions by the director providing for performance of duties of common nature … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … absent and over all dominionof power lies with the board or the administrator. The above being the position, one of the major ingredients required to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1968

Kalusingh and ors. Vs. Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-09-1968

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 48, 48(3), 57, 57(8) and 64; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1970Raj149

unreported case Civil Writ Petn. No. 267 of 1963 (Raj), Jhalawar Transport Co. v. R.T.A., but the … the number of the permit, a separate serial number contained in brackets after the number of the permit.8. Section 48 provides for grant of stage carriage permit. The relevant part of this section runs as follows:'48. Grant of … it must perform in a quasi judicial mariner and the other functions it can perform altogether in an administrative manner.11-A. In Veerappa Pillai v. Raman and Raman Ltd., AIR 1952 SC 192 (196), the Supreme Court has … daily services to be maintained in relation to any route or area generally or on specified days and occasions;(iii) that copies of the time-table of … accordance with the provisions of Section 57 (8) of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter called the Act) inviting objections in respect thereof within a period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 15 1967

Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath Vs. Janardan Vishwanath Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43, 46, 47 and 49; ;Maharashtra Presidency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969Bom111; (1968)70BOMLR376; ILR1969Bom766

of substance within the limits allowed by law'. It was held by the Privy Council in Hook v. Administrator General 48 Ind App 187= (AIR 1921 PC 11) that the plea of res judicata still remains apart … trying the title thereto.6. Extensive amendments were made Chapter VII by the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1963 (Act No.41 of 1963) which came into force on the 28th of November 1963. The first of such … months and thereupon, the plaintiff terminated agreement and filed an application under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (Ejectment Application No.8/177

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2008

Ram Lakhan Sahani, Son of Late Thakoor Sahani Vs. Lakshmi Sahani and o ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-26-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(2), 15 and 15(1) - Schedule - Article 136; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 182; Bengal Money-lenders Act - Sections 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9 - Order 23, Rule 3A

of limitation in the execution of a decree from three years in general to 12 years, while under the earlier Act it was provided that … execution of a decree or order of any civil Court not provided for by Article 183 or by Section 48 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.Three years, or, where a certified copy of the decree or order … High Court in its writ jurisdiction for a direction to the Railway Administration to refund the amount of freight which had already been held as … Suit No. 212 of 1971 as not executable being time barred according to Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.2. The facts relevant for the decision in this revision application are not in dispute and may be briefly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1993

Luga Bay Shipping Corporation and Etc. Vs. the Board of Trustees of th ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-25-1993

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 116; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1994Ker71

Board to recover damages.8. In exercise of the powers conferred by Sections 48, 49 and 50 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, the Cochin … operate only in areas not covered by any law validly made. The general principle as distinguished from an absolute rule of uniform application seems to … not to adjudicate upon the quantum of damages in this proceedings.6. Section 116 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 states that if, through the negligence of any person having the guidance or command of any vessel any … the power is silent with regard to the giving of a pre-decisional hearing to the person affected the administrative decision after post-decisionai hearing was good'.In the instant case since the petitioners' right to question the correctness or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2018

K. Lakshiminarayanan Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Central Government means the President and include in relation to the administration of a Union Territory, the administrator thereof. It is submitted that the President has framed Rules of Business … it is the Parliament alone which can provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory under the Act, 1963. Section 3 does provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory with thirty members to be elected members … of Council of Ministers. Shri Sibal refers to Rule 4(2) and Rule 48 of the Business Rules to buttress his submission. It is submitted that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2002

Delhi Electricity Supply Undertaking Vs. Bhimandas Ambwani and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 9, 9(1), 9(3), 10, 11, 13A, 16, 17(1), 17(3), 17(3A), 17(3A) (2), 24, 31(2) and 48; Displaced Persons(Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - pption 12; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002VIAD(Delhi)934; 2002(63)DRJ429

on its facts and cannot be treated as an authority for the general proposition that, even in cases like the present one, where subsequent notifications … for some reason, it can be ignored and proceedings continued under the 1963 notifications. But there is no ground to consider it as non est. … and not a final one, it may be noticed that although there cannot be (SIC) language used in Section 48 of the said Act, the State Government could not have withdrawn from the acquisition once the possession had … party to whom the compensation had been paid or made payable etc. By a letter dated 12.01.1968, the Administration informed the writ petitioner that the land had been notified under Section 6 of the said Act on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1974

The Ahmedabad St. Xavier's College Society and Anr. Vs. State of Gujar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 25, 26, 29, 29(1), 30 and 30(1); Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 33A, 33A(1), 40, 41, 51A and 52A; Gujarat University (Amendment) Act, 1973; Bombay University Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR1974SC1389; (1974)1SCC717; [1975]1SCR173

Matched in: Advocate N.A. Palkhiwala,; I.M. Nanavati,; Sudhir Nanavati,; F.S. Nariman Addl. Sol. General of India, ; R.H. Dhebar, ; S.P. N

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2010

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-16-2010

Subject : Property Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - 40(1), 4, 6,12, 3(1)(4), 5-A, 5-A(2), 40(1)(a), 3(1)(iii), 44-B, Chapter 7 ; Companies Act - 252, 3, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, 568, 570, 573, 617 Read With 2(23), 12(2)(b), 13(2), 27(2); Orissa Industrial Infrastructural Development Corporation Act - 15, 5-A(2); Land Acquisition (Companies) Rule - 4, 3(2), 4 3(1)(3); Government Land Settlement Rules 5, 115.

Matched in: Advocate Mr.R.K.Rath; M/s. Kousik; M/s. Subir Palit; C.Mishra; A.Mishra;A.K.Mohana. Mr. Asok Mohanty; General; Mr.Sanjit Mohanty; Mr. D.K.Samantray; Mr. H.K.Panigrahi; Mr. Asok Mohanty; Mr. Sanjit Mohanty; Sr.Mr. D.K.Samantray; Mr. H.K.Panigrahi; Mr. P.K.Muduli; Mr. S.Nanda; Mr. Asok Mohanty; Mr. Sanjit Mohanty; Mr. D.K.Samantray; Mr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial