Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 46 · Page 1 of about 2,220 results (0.131 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 1967

Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath Vs. Janardan Vishwanath Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43, 46, 47 and 49; ;Maharashtra Presidency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969Bom111; (1968)70BOMLR376; ILR1969Bom766

by law'. It was held by the Privy Council in Hook v. Administrator General 48 Ind App 187= (AIR 1921 PC 11) that the plea … trying the title thereto.6. Extensive amendments were made Chapter VII by the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1963 (Act No.41 of 1963) which came into force on the 28th of November 1963. The first of such … date of the application, he shall be deemed to have shown cause within the meaning of the section. Section 46 provided that nothing in Chapter VII shall be deemed to protect any applicant obtaining possession of any property

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2008

The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu High Cour ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-20-2008

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1913 - Sections 20; Administrators General (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 25; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 30, 31(2) and 48B; Companies Act - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680

Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated … the respondent/Housing Board for a public purpose, viz. Housing scheme by the respondent/Board, for which, a notice under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 30.10.1985, an enquiry under Section 5A of the Land

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1992

Collector, Varanasi Vs. Rai Prem Chand and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Land Acuquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 11, 18, 22, 23, 23(1), 26, 26(1)and (2), 47, 53 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2) and (9) and 96; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Articles 115, 151, 153 and 156; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 53(5); Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887; Provincial Insolvency Act - Sections 46; Succession Act; Probate and Administration Act;

Reported in : AIR1992All206

Schedule I to the Limitation Act and by the General Provisions of the Act also. Subsection (4) of Section 46 of the Provincial Insolvency Act does not seem to a have been required, but whether it was required … sought unlessit was specifically made applicable to proceedings under the Act. It was contended thatno provision of Limitation Act, 1963 has beenmade applicable to Land Acquisition Act andtherefore no plea as to bar of limitation can beraised to … There are several Acts, for example, the Succession Act, the Probate and Administration Act, and the Land Acquisition Act, which make the Code of Civil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 06 2018

K. Lakshiminarayanan Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

appearing for the appellants. We have heard Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for the Union of India. Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel has … it is the Parliament alone which can provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory under the Act, 1963. Section 3 does provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory with thirty members to be elected members … the Legislative Assembly of the Union territory may make rules for regulating and conducting its business. 14 Similarly, Section 46 provides that the President shall make the rules for allocation of business to the Ministers and for the … the Central Government means the President and include in relation to the administration of a Union Territory, the administrator thereof. It is submitted that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1976

R. Manickam and ors. Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry, Represent ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-18-1976

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ28

that the expression 'State Government' is defined in Section 3(60) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 as follows:as respects anything done or to be done … Undersecretary to Government as provided in the rules framed under Section 46(3) of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963. In terms of that Section the order so authenticated shall not be called in question on the ground … Pondicherry is the Central Government. The powers and functions of the Central Government have been delegated to the Administrator, vis., the Lieutenant-Governor of Pondicherry. Therefore, it is the Lieutenant-Governor who should be satisfied before the issue of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 ?2, Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … to constitute a local authority, is absent and over all dominionof power lies with the board or the administrator. The above being the position, one of the major ingredients required to make a body a local authority … market commit-tee (section 65)(xii) The State Government to supersede market commit-tee (section 46).(xiii) Power of administrator to amend the schedule (section 66)(xiii) Director to call

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2013

i.Suriya Vs. Chief Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-14-2013

Subject : Education

conferred under Article 239 of the Constitution of India and Section 46 of the Government of Union Territory Act, 1963 promulgated the Rules of Business of Government of Pondicherry, 1963. The Rules of Business contain detailed provisions with … AS PER ORD.DT.30/7/13 IN WP19528/2013) 7 THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, SECRETARIAT, PUDUCHERRY-605 001. (R6-SUOMOTU IMPL AS PER ORD.DT.06/8/13 IN M.P.NO.1/2013) .. RESPONDENTS Writ Petition filed under Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1999

K. R. Patel Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1999]106TAXMAN151(SC)

in his hands under the provisions of Section 168 of the Act.High Court examined the provisions of the Administrators- General Act, 1963 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and held as under:- "It appears to be quite clear that though … two decisions one of the Madras High Court in CIT vs. Estate of late T.P. Ramaswami Pillai [(1962) 46 ITR 666 (Mad)] and the other of Bombay High Court in Court Receiver vs. CIT [(1964) 54 ITR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2007

Prestige Housewares India Limited, Bangalore and Another Vs. Gupta Lig ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Jul-05-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property

proceedings in question is a proceeding before the High Court. Therefore, the proceedings under section 56 read with section 46 of the Act is governed by the provisions of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It appears … by limitation, we would have to see as to whether the applications filed are governed by the Limitation Act, 1963. Even when the rectification applications were filed before the High Courts, prior to the coming into force of … of £ 5000 was included in the licence for equipment for machinery generally totaling to £ 20,000 granted by the Government of India. The Prestige

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 1983

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-1983

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15

Reported in : 1983(14)ELT1688(Del); ILR1983Delhi327

(which is within the terrtorial waters of India) on 7-10-1980. The Import General Manifest in respect of the said vessel was filed with the Customs … in Re: Sea Customs Act, S. 20 AIR 1963 SC 1760 (11) the Supreme Court held that … the rate and valuation in force, : (a) in the case of goods entered for home consumption under Section 46, on the date onwhich a bill of entry in respect of such goods is presented under that section;(b) … and the considerations of national economy are so urgent that it would be tresspassing on the legislative and administrative field if courts were to hold that a rate of duty or tax was immutable for any particular … we shall deal with a particular petition separately.(2) The petitioners challenge the action of the respondents in demanding the duty of custom on consignment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial