Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 42 · Page 1 of about 2,533 results (0.113 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 1965

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1965

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 21(4), 23(1) and 36; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

Matched in: Advocate R.C. Chaudhry,; C.M. Nayar,; M.B. Singh,; L.D. Kaushal, Sr. Deputy Adv. General and; P.R. Jain, Adv.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1985

Florida Power and Light Co. Vs. Lorion

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-20-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

administrative hearing occurred or could have occurred would result in irrational consequences that could not be squared with general principles respecting judicial review of agency action. Pp. 470 U. S. 741 -745. 229 U.S.App.D.C. 440, 712 F.2d … of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission "made reviewable by" 42 U.S.C. § 2239. Section 2239(b), in turn, provides that the Hobbs Act governs review of "[a]ny … operating license. The Commission treated the letter as a citizen petition, under its rules, requesting the institution of administrative proceedings to suspend the license. After the Commission ultimately denied the request, respondent petitioned the Court of Appeals … CIRCUIT Syllabus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2342(4), a provision of the Hobbs Act, the courts of appeals have exclusive jurisdiction over petitions for review of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1990

Vasantkumar Radhakisan Vora Vs. the Board of Trustees of the Port of B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Presedency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 42(A) 43, 45 to 47 and 49; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 41; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 2, 5, 57, 106, 109 and 111; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 29(1) and 133(2A); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 17; Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 87; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(4), 136, 226 and 227; Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939; Agricultural Holdings Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 23(1); Calcutta Port Act - Sections 142; Defence (General) Regulations, 1939 - Regulation 55; Maharashtra Presedency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Presedency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1991SC14; JT1990(3)SC609; 1990(2)SCALE297; (1991)1SCC761; [1990]3SCR825

Matched in: Advocate R.S. Mehta, Adv Ashok H. Desai, Solicitor General, ; U.J. Makhija, ; B.S. Bisa

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 1991

Southern India Bearing Distributors Association and Another Vs. Navlom ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-14-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 42(2), (7), 43(2) and 120

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC315

the carrier cannot be made liable at all in view of section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, particularly sub-section (7) therein. The relevant provisions of section 42(2) and 42(7) run as follows : '42.(2) A … cardboards, films, nylon yarn in boxes, paper rolls, cases containing books and general cargo which are easily combustible. In this regard, DW-1 also admitted as … the loss of the goods in transit was held to be due to the negligence of the railway administration. 14. We see considerable force in the argument of learned counsel for the first plaintiff, first appellant in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 ?2, Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … to constitute a local authority, is absent and over all dominionof power lies with the board or the administrator. The above being the position, one of the major ingredients required to make a body a local authority … account books and other documents on the orders of the director (section 42).(xvii) Power of State Government to call for proceedings of market comcommittee to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2005

In Re: Begum Shanti Tufail Ahmad Khan an Application for Grant of Prob ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-06-2005

Subject : Family

Acts : Courts of Wards Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Schedule - Article 137; Indian Limitation Act, 1901 - Schedule - Article 181; Indian Succession Act, 1923 - Sections 141; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 48; Mullah's Principles of Mohamdan Laws - Sections 117 and 118; Muslim Law

Reported in : AIR2006All75

petition for probate. Sri J. Nagar, Administrator General states that in the circumstances Article 137 of the Limitation Act 1963 would be applicable, which is residuary clause and provides that for any other application for which no period … to Sri Ruikom Deen son of Sri Badruddin, alleged to be the only surviving next kith and kin. Administrator General, Board of Revenue, U.P. and to be published in the news paper. The advertisement was carried out … that on the death of Tufail Ahmad Khan at the age of 42 years his properties were attached by the Collector, Aligarh under the Courts … 151, Hon'ble S.B. Sinha, J (as he then was) held relying upon Section 118 of Mullah's principles of Mahomedan Law that a Mahomedan cannot by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1988

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Gujarat-ii, Ahmedabad Vs. Arvind Narottam ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-1988

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act - Sections 21 and 21(1)(2); Finance Act - Sections 42(2)

Reported in : AIR1988SC1824; (1988)72CTR(SC)94; [1988]173ITR479(SC); JT1988(3)SC423; 1988(2)SCALE401; (1988)4SCC113a; [1988]Supp2SCR266

as it stood at the relevant time provided:Section 21. Assessment when assets are held by courts of wards, administrators-general, etc.-(1) In the case of assets chargeable to tax under this Act, which are held by a court … them to vote then they can.3. The Wealth Tax Officer made assessment orders for the assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64 and 1964-65 under the Wealth Tax Act, the relevant valuation dates being December 31, 1961, December 31, 1962 … clause and by the words 'as near as may be' in Section 42(2) of the Finance Act.9. It is vehemently urged by Dr. Gauri Shanker

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1990

Kalyan Singh Vs. Vakilsingh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-1990

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151, 152 and 153 - Order 7, Rule 7 - Order 20, Rules 3 and 6; Specific Relier Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1990MP295

not open to interference in second appeal. This Court having made a general assessment of the evidence has formed an opinion that there is nothing … be not maintainable. The objection of the defendant was founded on proviso to Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 which provides that no Court shall make a declaration contemplated by Section 34 where the plaintiff being able … Begum v. Shah Mohd. Khan, AIR 1943 PC 94 that the further relief contemplated by the proviso to Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act is relief against the defendant only in Sunderesa Iyer v. S.S. V. Nidhi … as it stands. 12. On the ground of public policy and fair administration of justice also, no evidence can be permitted to be adduced so

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Sri Tribhanga Bihari Bhanja and ors. Vs. Sri Prahlad Chandra Tung and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Section 44(2); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100 - Orders 1, Rule 9 - Order 22, Rule 4(A) and 4(4) - Order 41, Rules 25 and 27

Reported in : (2006)3CALLT415(HC)

substitution of the legal representative of the defendant under this rule within the period specified in the Limitation Act 1963 (36 of 1963), and the suit has, in consequence abated and(b) the plaintiff applies after the expiry of … the absence of a person representing the estate of the deceased person, or may by order appoint the Administrator-General, or an officer of the Court or such other person as it thinks fit to represent the estate … in the name of the defendants. The plaintiffs filed an objection under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act for rectification of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2013

A.Chandrasekaran Vs. Yoha Securities Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2013

Subject : MRTP

own periods of limitation in place of the period laid in the general law of limitation; and (b) but the parties to an agreement are … that the period of limitation for filing a reference should be governed by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. But unfortunately, the reference to arbitration and the passing of the award happened before the said circular and … in Section 29(2), fell for consideration in a few cases. Though the expression ".local law". is defined in Section 42 of the Indian Penal Code, the same meaning cannot be adopted for the purpose of understanding the expression … provisions of the Act and time taken by the Relevant Authority to administratively resolve the claim, differences or disputes shall be excluded for the purpose

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial