Advanced Search Results

Chandra Shekhar Dave Vs. Administrator General of the State of Rajasth ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Administrative General Act, 1963 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39 and 40, Rule 1; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR2001Raj166; 2001(4)WLC673; 2001(3)WLN331

50/98, by which the learned Single Judge dismissed the application of the appellant-petitioner u/S. 10 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1963').(2). The necessary facts giving rise to this special appeal are … special appeal, the learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner has made the following two submissions:-1. That the provisions of Sec. 10 of the Act of 1963 are meant for preserving theassets of the deceased persons by getting the … competent to pass orders under Ihe provisions of Order 39 or Order 40 Rule 1 r/w Sec. 151 CPC even in matters of probate and

Smt. Bindu Garg Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 47A

Reported in : (1999)122PLR794

and this Court ultimately fixed the market value at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per square yards. In Administrator General of West Bengal's case (supra) this court upheld rejection of the small plots of lands and accepted … the notification Ex.P.36 under Section 4 of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was issued on January 5, 1978. As such the sale instances do not reflect a fair market value … Raj Bala v. Haryana State 15.03.199514. 110/92 Rajbir v. Haryana State 10.06.199515. 40/4/92 Shanti Devi v. Haryana State 04.12.19956. 53/4/92 Gurcharan Singh v. Haryana State

Abdul HusseIn Tayabali Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1967)8GLR856

grounds which survive are the other three. The first ground is too general and vague and does not give any idea as to which particular … proviso to Section 55, published rules called the Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, 1963 (hereafter called the company rules), which became effective from 22nd June 1963. … purpose which is mentioned in the two impugned notifications is not a public purpose within the meaning of Section 40, Sub-section (1), Clause (aa) of the Act;(3) the State Government has used its power mala fide and in … Section 5A was quasi judicial was given up. It was conceded that, an enquiry under Section 5A is administrative in nature. But, the submission was remodelled to contend that, even though the enquiry was administrative in nature,

Dev Raj Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 3, 4, 7, 8, 8(1), 10, 24, 22, 33, 40 and 40(3); Central General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3); Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 19; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rules 3, 4, 7(3), 19, 19(2), 22, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 49 and 98; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Statute Law

Reported in : AIR1974P& H65

applied for its transfer, transferred to him.40. Section 6 of the Central General Clauses Act (10 of 1897), which deals with the effect of repeal … since rule 30 of the Rules has been repealed on 3rd August, 1963, the property in question could not be transferred to any one of … the Act.26. Sections 22 to 23 contain provisions for appeal, revision etc, to various authorities under the Act. Section 40, which is the last section of the Act, authorises the Central Government to make Rules to carry out … pool the rules governing the manner, terms and conditions of such transfer are changed as a result of administrative experience on the whole a retrospective operation of these rules controlling all incomplete transfers would seem to yield

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 63; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 9, 10 and 13 - Order 31, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9, 20, 20(2) and 26; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3(2) - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR329

of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala : [1957]1SCR874 ; Mahadeolal Kanodia v. The Administrator General of W.B. : [1960]3SCR578 , and Leader v. Dupley, 1888 (13) … Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 9, 20, 20 (2) and 26 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872, Section 2 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 3 (2) and Article 113 … vide section 84(1) (a) of the Law of Property Act, 1925 which has no counterpart in this country. Section 40 of the T.P. Act contains no such limitation. So far as section 20(2) of the SR Act is

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 ?2, Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … the credit of a market fund shall be kept or invested in such manner as may be prescribed.'19. Section 40 deals with the purpose for which the market fund may be expended.20. It may be noted that in … absent and over all dominionof power lies with the board or the administrator. The above being the position, one of the major ingredients required to

Mrs. Gurnam Kaur Vs. Sh. Pritam Singh Bhatia and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

kindred to him, the properties shall go to the Government. Similarly, as per Section 10 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, whenever any person has died leaving assets exceeding rupees fifty thousand in value and the High Court is

Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad Vs. Kamalini Khatau (Sm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5, 160 and 161 to 166; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1994SC2759; (1994)119CTR(SC)169; [1994]209ITR101(SC); JT1994(4)SC16; 1994(2)SCALE976; (1994)4SCC308; [1994]3SCR942

payable in respect thereof.7. Some analogous provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, may also be noted. Section 40 stated that where the guardian or trustee of any person being a minor, lunatic or idiot was entitled … In the case of income, profits or gains chargeable under this Act which the Courts of Wards, the Administrators-General, the Official Trustees or any receiver or manager (including any person whatever his designation who in fact manages … Citation : Income Tax Act 1961 s.164 - LIMITATION ACT (36 OF 1963)Section 5: [Arijit Pasayat & Asok Kumar Ganguly, JJ] Condonation of delay Expression

Ayisha Beevi and ors. Vs. Sheik Mydeen and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 144, 47, 151; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

may proceed further without any one representing the estate of the deceased. Alternatively, the Court may appoint the Administrator General or an Officer of the Court to represent the estate of the deceased. (j) The Court has … suit at the time of hearing. (h) The Court has the power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay in seeking to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the … Gauhati High Court in Rahima Khatun v. Samser Ali [AIR 1985 Gauhati 40], a decision of M.Thanikachalam, J., in C.Manoharan vs. C.V.Subramaniam {2006 (4) MLJ

Sri Tribhanga Bihari Bhanja and ors. Vs. Sri Prahlad Chandra Tung and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Section 44(2); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100 - Orders 1, Rule 9 - Order 22, Rule 4(A) and 4(4) - Order 41, Rules 25 and 27

Reported in : (2006)3CALLT415(HC)

substitution of the legal representative of the defendant under this rule within the period specified in the Limitation Act 1963 (36 of 1963), and the suit has, in consequence abated and(b) the plaintiff applies after the expiry of … the absence of a person representing the estate of the deceased person, or may by order appoint the Administrator-General, or an officer of the Court or such other person as it thinks fit to represent the estate … in the name of the defendants. The plaintiffs filed an objection under Section 44(2a) of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act for rectification of the