Advanced Search Results

Prakash Corporates Vs. Dee Vee Projects Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 20203, for extension of the period of limitation prescribed under the general law of limitation or under any special law, in 1 Hereinafter also … provided for exclusion of the period from 15.03.2020 till 02.10.2021. A look at the scheme of the Limitation Act, 1963 makes it 9 To complete the scenario, we may indicate in the passing that even after we had … and filed reply of the application under Order 38 Rule 5 on 15.03.2021. The proviso of Order … declines to interfere.................................10 Rival Submissions....................................................................................................................12 Relevant statutory provisions...................................................................................................18 Impact of COVID-19:..............................................................................................................21 Orders passed in SMWP No.3 of 2020.................................................................................21 Administrative order issued by the High Court....................................................................29 Time limit for filing written statement and consequences of default.......................................32 Operation and … for “Construction of Two Laning with Hard Shoulder of Tara-Premnagar- Ramanunjnagar Road Section in the State of Chhattisgarh”; and the other being the work awarded

The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu High Cour ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1913 - Sections 20; Administrators General (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 25; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 30, 31(2) and 48B; Companies Act - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680

Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated … the respondent/Housing Board for a public purpose, viz. Housing scheme by the respondent/Board, for which, a notice under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 30.10.1985, an enquiry under Section 5A of the Land … P. Alwar Chetty v. P. Chidambara Mudali and 6 Ors. 1915 Vol. XXXVIII Indian Law Reports 1134, while dealing with the consequence of an order

Ashok Kumar Choudhary . Vs. Delhi Jal Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi Vs. Sushila Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

Sarv Rural and Urban Welfare Society Vs. Union of India .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

Kapil Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate ser.sel.board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

Mukesh Kumar . Vs. Delhi Subordinate ser.selecn Bd .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

Bir Singh Vs. Delhi Jal Board .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 were considered to arrive at the following conclusion: “14. The effect of these provisions is also that the … a State in relation to the Union/Central Government. The provisions of Article 239 and 239A of the Constitution; Section 38 3(8) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 defining ‘Central Government’ and the provisions of the Government of Union … before the High Court of Delhi against the order/orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The learned Tribunal following Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao (supra) and Action

John B. James and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Anoth ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 29, 33A and 38-C(2); Amended by Karnataka Act, 2000; Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) (Repealing) Ordinance, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 123, 213, 226, 254(2) and 367; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 16(2);Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 - Articles 65 and 112; Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 1; Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974; Karnataka Regularisation of Unauthorised Constructions in Urban Areas Act, 1991; City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 88 and 107; Bihar Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1949; Bihar

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4134; 2001(1)KarLJ364

claim that they are in possession of the sites in pursuance of general powers of attorney executed in their favour by the original owner or … in denial of the title of the true owner, for a long period. Section 27 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that at the determination of the period limited under that Act, to any person for instituting a … is hit by the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation.37. Promissory estoppel is a doctrine applicable to administrative law and administrative action. It is not available as a ground to challenge legislations. The doctrine of promissory … of BDA, the common factor being the relief sought, based on Section 38-C(2) of the BDA Act, which was inserted by Karnataka Act 1 of

Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2 and 6; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 4, 5, 6, 9(1), 9(2), 10, 52A(1), 52A(4), 53, 210 and 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 4, 11A, 11A(1), 11A(2), 12A, 19, 21, 25, 26, 35P, 37, 37(2), 37A, 38(2) and 39; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC358; 1988(19)LC131(Delhi); 1989(39)ELT211(Del)

Excise and Customs could invest in the Director (Audit) in the Directorate General of Inspection and Audit (Customs & Central Excise), New Delhi, the powers … State Government invested by the Central Board of Excise and Customs constituted under the Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 (54 of 1963) with any of the powers of a Central Excise Officer under this Act. Rule 4 … contentions, we may go into history about the field organisation of the Central Excise Department. Till 1938, the administration of Central Excise duties was left in the hands of the Provincial Governments in their respective territories. At … the powers of a Collector of Central Excise for the purposes of Section 11-A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the assign … in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 38(2) of the Act. The Rules have also been