Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 36 · Page 1 of about 2,725 results (0.132 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 1965

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1965

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 21(4), 23(1) and 36; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

Matched in: Advocate R.C. Chaudhry,; C.M. Nayar,; M.B. Singh,; L.D. Kaushal, Sr. Deputy Adv. General and; P.R. Jain, Adv.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1999

K.R. Patel (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1), 160, 168 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 29 and 36; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 222, 302, 317 and 366; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 41 and 176(4); Administrators General Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1999SC3203; [1999]239ITR738(SC); JT1999(6)SC293; 1999(5)SCALE249; (1999)7SCC26; [1999]Supp2SCR44

hands under the provisions of Section 168 of the Act. High Court examined the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and held as under:It appears to be quite clear that though the … Act and a proper register has to be maintained containing particulars of the properties of the trust. Under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trust Act notwithstanding anything contained in the instrument of trust no sale of immovable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2004

Putur Nanemma Vs. Jilakara Gundaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-25-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 23; Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Board of Revenue Regulation, 1803; Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue (Replacement by Commissioners) Act, 1977 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 162; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 36, 38 and 41

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD639; 2004(4)ALT122

15. While dealing with the grant of injunctions under Sections 36, 38 and 41 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the learned Single Judge observed that the grant of injunction is a judicial discretion and it must be … she has been cultivating the land and also raised mango garden. The evidence of P.Ws.2 and 3, Village Administrative Officer and Advocate-Commissioner respectively clearly show that the plaintiff has been in possession of the land and cultivating … discretion consists in an observance of the rules and considerations which have generally guided and influenced Courts in granting injunctions..........Such a discretion must be exercised … violating the law and the rule of assignment thereby becoming repugnant to Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act making it void conferring no right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 08 1967

Khaje Khanavar Khadskhan Hushenkhan and anr. Vs. Siddavanhalli Nijalin ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-08-1967

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act - Sections 34, 36, 38 and 123(7); Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 14; Conduct of Elections Rules - Rules 27 and 28; Constitution of India - Article 173

Reported in : AIR1968Kant18; AIR1968Mys18

ORDER(1) At the General Elections of this year 1967. Mr. Siddavanahalli Nijalingappa who was at that … under the provisions of the Constitution and this Act or under provisions of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, as the case may be.'The relevant portion of the latter reads:--'33. Presentation of nomination paper and requirements for … from the law or the Rules. He formulated four such instances.(144) The first of them is that though Section 36 of the R.P. Act prohibits adjournments of scrutiny proceedings, the 2nd respondent had deliberately postponed or adjourned the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1999

Smt. Bindu Garg Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 47A

Reported in : (1999)122PLR794

and this Court ultimately fixed the market value at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per square yards. In Administrator General of West Bengal's case (supra) this court upheld rejection of the small plots of lands and accepted … the notification Ex.P.36 under Section 4 of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was issued on January 5, 1978. As such the sale instances do not reflect a fair market value

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2026

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

of the periodof limitation are contained in Sections 12 to 24 included in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 is not a provision dealing with “computation of the period of limitation”. It is only after the … and the Judge (Revisions) Sales tax exercising jurisdiction under the Sales Tax Act, are “courts”. They are merely Administrative Tribunals and “not courts”. Section 14, Limitation Act, therefore, does not, in terms apply to proceedings before such … 5 must receive liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in bringing the appeal are required to be condoned in the … Acquisition) and Another v. Shah Manilal Chandulal and Others [1996] 2 SCR 366 : (1996) 9 SCC 414; Prakash H. Jain v. Marie Fernandes [2003]

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2018

K. Lakshiminarayanan Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

more convenient transaction of business. He submits that both the rules framed under Act, 1963 as well as Section 36, there is no rule providing consultation of the Council of Ministers or Chief Minister before making any nomination … appearing for the appellants. We have heard Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for the Union of India. Shri Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel has … it is the Parliament alone which can provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory under the Act, 1963. Section 3 does provide for constitution of Legislative Assembly for Union Territory with thirty members to be elected members … the Central Government means the President and include in relation to the administration of a Union Territory, the administrator thereof. It is submitted that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2007

Binny Mill Labour Welfare House Building Co-operative Society Limited ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2007

Subject : Contract

Acts : Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 125; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 31; Mysore Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 18; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 19, 23 and 24 to 30; Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 47, 48 and 49; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Companies Act

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2245; 2009(2)KarLJ291; 200(3)KCCR1692; 2008(5)AIRKarR120; AIR2008NOC2774

void and plaintiff has no right to the suit schedule site. The General body meeting authorised the new office bearers in the meeting held on … not from the date of registration but from the date of execution of the said document.;(D) Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 31--Cancellation of a sale deed under--Unilateral cancellation of a sale deed by a vendor who had executed the … Therefore, the said sale is void. He further contended as per Clause 36 of the bye laws, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and three directors of … same for approval. However, no steps were taken by the society.16. Thereafter, the society was superseded and an administrator was appointed. The administrator did not take any steps. However, after elections were conducted the new office bearers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1969

Gopal Vinayak Godse Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-1969

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 4(1), 99A, 99A(1), 99B, 99C, 99D, 99E, 99F, 99G, 179 and 342; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 32, 226, 226(1A), 227 and 311(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A, 153A and 295A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29 and 29(2); Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Constitution of India (Fifth Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 8; Punjab Special Powers (Press) Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Marwar Land Revenue Act, 1949 - Sections 86; High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rule 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1922; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1971Bom56; (1970)72BOMLR871; 1971CriLJ324

Matched in: Advocate M.V. Paranjpe, ;M.D. Pathak and ;M.K. Joshi, Advs. H.M. Seervai, Adv. General, ;G.H. Rajadhyaksha, ;V.N. Lokur and ;J.C. Sawant, Advs. and ;V.H. Gumaste, Govt. Pleader

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Marketing Produce Comcommi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Agricultural Market Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 5(7), (9), (10) and (14), 8, 9, 10, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 35, 39 and 65; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20) and 256(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) General Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Article 239; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Delhi Development Act - Sections 3, 4, 5, 30, 37, 52, 56 and 59; Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)298; [2001]250ITR369(Delhi)

Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 3(31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 ?2, Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances … Bombay High Court examined the question whether the market comcommittee constituted under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, to which reference has been made, was a local authority. After examining various clauses of the Act, it … to constitute a local authority, is absent and over all dominionof power lies with the board or the administrator. The above being the position, one of the major ingredients required to make a body a local authority … of license by the director (section 35(2))(iv) Appeal to the board (section 36(a)) payment of contribution to the board by a market comcommittee out of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial