Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 34 · Page 1 of about 2,936 results (0.114 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 1996

The Administrator General Vs. Vinod Bhushan Alias Kamal NaraIn and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-15-1996

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 9, 9(1) and (2), 10 and 11; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(5) and (6) and 10; Administrator General Act, 1913; Charitable and Religious Trust Act - Sections 34 and 37

Reported in : AIR1996All350

the record.17. Order accordingly. TrustS and societies - management of trust property - Sections 9 and 10 of Administrators General Act, 1963 and Section 10 of Official Trustees Act, 1913 - application filed for grant of letter of administration in … sell the immovable properties and to wind up the Trust. The Court was considering the provisions of Sections 34 and 37 of the Charitable and Religious Trust Act and the observation made by the Court was in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2009

Sri. H.S. Manjunath S/O Siddegowda, Junior Assistant, Ksrtc, Vs. the M ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-25-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Kerala Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 15, 17A, 18, 19, 34, 34(1), 34(2), 44, 45 and 45(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 22; Kerala Road Transport Corporation Rules; Kerala Road Transport Corporation Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 162, 166, 166(3) and 226

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2482:ILR2009(2)Kar2492:2009(4)KCCRSN216:2009(6)AIRKarR244.

Matched in: Advocate V.S. Naik and ;Manjula N. Kulkarni, Advs. L. Govindaraj, Adv. for R-1 to 5 and ;Udaya Holla, Adv. General for R-6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2006

Yanala Malleshwari and ors. Vs. Ananthula Sayamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-24-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 to 22, 17(1), 17(2), 23A, 32, 32A, 34, 35, 49, 58, 59, 60, 60(2), 61, 61(2), 69, 71, 72 and 77; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4, 5 to 34, 38 to 53A, 54 to 57, 59, 107, 123 and 126; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 13, 15, 17, 21, 31, 31(2), 33, 34 and 49; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 25, 29 and 65; Evidence Act - Sections 73; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 18, 34, 39 and 41; Indian Registration Act, 1866; Indian Registration Act, 1871; Indian Registration Act, 1877; Registration and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 4B; Andhra Pradesh Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1922; General Clau

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT523; 2007(1)CTC97; AIR2007AP57; 2007(2)AIRKarR382(FB)

181/3 of Nagaram village under registered sale deed, dated 16.09.2005, executed by General Power of Attorney holder. The petitioner received a notice from the Sub-Registrar … person must have reasonable apprehension that such instrument if left outstanding may cause him serious injury. Insofar as Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act is concerned, it is no doubt true that a person entitled to any … by respondents 4 and 5 as void, illegal, contrary to statutory provisions, administrative instructions and circulars. It is the case of the petitioner that her … and requires to be adjudicated only in common law proceedings, such as a suit under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.4. In W.P. No. 25661 of 2005, the petitioner seeks a writ of Certiorari quashing the registered document bearing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 11 1991

M.P. Mattur and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Court Fees Act, 1817 - Sections 7(IV); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Reported in : 1991(21)DRJ249

the property if being deprived, hence they have status as envisaged under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.(15) Mr. Banerjee then contended that decree if passed would beviolative of … with the reply of the Government of India, the Industrial Workers in general andD.T.C. employees in particular resorted to take stringent measure and, thereforee, issued … Scheme on the conditions enumerated berein.While the decision was yet to be taken by the Dtc, the Delhi Administration on the other hand approved the decision to sell houses constructed under the integrated Subsidised Housing Scheme for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2001

Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Tribes Employees Association Vs. Aditya Prata ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-2001

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(4), 16(1), 16(4), 21, 32, 121, 124(4), 136, 141, 226, 233 to 237, 309, 335, 341, 342, 342(1), 342(2), 366(24) and 366(25); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 11, 80, 100(4), 100(5), 151, 152 and 153; Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 40, 41, 42 and 44; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 - Sections 5 and 11; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes Order, 1950; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21; Malaya Rubber Regulati

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD582; 2001(6)ALT433

Judge, Parvathipuram.27. There cannot be any doubt that the suit was under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. It is rather doubtful as to how the suit for mere declaration without any consequential relief was maintainable. … is a notified ST. After dismissal of the second appeal, the Government issued GO Rt. No. 1700, General Administration (SC.F) Department, dated 30-4-1990 to the effect that first respondent shall be deemed to have been appointed as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2011

A.C. Muthiah Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

suits. However, the declarations sought can be granted only in terms of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. A bare reading of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act would indicate that the plaintiff in order … (2) to suspend the amendment to Clause 6.2.4 in the Regulations for players, team officials, managers, umpires and administrators and Board of Control for Cricket in India (for short "BCCI") Code 2008, which permits an administrator to … restrain BCCI from permitting the respondent No. 2 to participate in the General Body Meeting scheduled in Mumbai on September 27, 2008 or onany other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2026

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

of the periodof limitation are contained in Sections 12 to 24 included in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 is not a provision dealing with “computation of the period of limitation”. It is only after the … appeal must be preferred to the CLB (now, NCLT) by the transferee.27. The counsel drew a comparison with Section 34 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 to indicate that unlike the said provision, which uses the words “but … exercising jurisdiction under the Sales Tax Act, are “courts”. They are merely Administrative Tribunals and “not courts”. Section 14, Limitation Act, therefore, does not, in … 5 must receive liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in bringing the appeal are required to be condoned in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1996

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 9, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1, 2, 3 and 4), 16, 16(1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), 17, 18, 19(1), 29, 29(2), 32, 38, 39, 39A, 41, 46, 226, 323, 323(A and B) and 323A(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 14, 15 and 28; Chancery Procedure Act - Sections 50; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 39; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 11-A, 22A; Constitution First Amendment Act, 1951; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 10(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 497; Punjab Prisons Service (Class II) Rules, 1963; Constitution (42nd) Amendment Act, 1977 - Article 323-A; Industria

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

power to grant such a decree independently of the requirements of the Section.'Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 replaced Section 42 of the earlier Act and provided,'Any person entitled to any legal Character, or to any … under our constitutional system is among equals and similarly situated. Equality in general cannot be universally applied and is subject to conditions and restrictions as … of the impugned Rule of the Punjab University Calendar, admittedly applicable in the Colleges run by the Chandigarh Administration, the decision of which was conveyed to him vide Annexure P/1. Annexure P/1 and the Rule is alleged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1997

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. R.S. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-25-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 32(2), 34 and 34(1)

Reported in : [1999]235ITR411(Ker)

under the Agricultural Income-tax Act, but also under the various Acts. These powers are enshrined for a fair administration and superintendence over the subordinate authority and in the interest of the Revenue and the Government. A general … the dates mentioned above assigning the status as 'Hindu undivided family/tenants-in-common'. The Deputy Commissioner, however, initiated proceedings under Section 34 of the Act on March 15, 1989, to revise the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1994

K.M. Munireddy Vs. B.K. Lakshmaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-21-1994

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62 and 64

Reported in : ILR1994KAR1740; 1994(4)KarLJ99

present suit ? 5. Is the suit of the plaintiff hit by Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963? 6. What order? Points 1 to 5:-11. The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff's grand-father Bovigooga was the … adequate, and many are incorrect, redundant, or slipshod in expression, the following general statement of the doctrine of estoppel by representation emerges: where one person … settlement etc. are not mere technical rules of evidence. They have an important purpose to serve in the administration of justice. The ultimate aim of the law is to secure justice. In recent times in order to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial