Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 28 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.123 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 01 2003

Virendra Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Adminstrators General Act, 1963 - Sections 51; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC6

in this petition) and the Administrator General took possession of the property in question.5. Section 51 of the Administrators General Act, 1963 provides':'All assets in the charge of the Administrator General which have been in his custody for a period … Virendra Kumar Gupta v. D.M.. Mirzapur and Ors., and a Bench of this Court passed an order on 28.7.1994 directing the A.D.M. Mirzapur to take possession of the disputed land from respondent Nos. 8 to 10 In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2016

Mangali Impex Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-03-2016

Subject : Customs

to such SOR. (See Gujarat University, Ahmedabad v. Krishna Rangnath Mudholkar AIR 1963 SC 703 para 20) Effect of Section 28 (11) 66. The mere … the Customs but also officers of the Commissionerates of Customs (Preventive), Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence ( DRI ), Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence … Muralidhar, J. Introduction 1. The common question in this batch of matters pertains to the constitutional validity of Section 28 (11) of the Customs Act, 1962 ( Act )which was inserted by the Customs (Amendment and Validation) Act, … Customs appointed as such prior to 6th July 2011 are deemed to be proper officers , then the administrative chaos that is likely to result, as was pointed out in the Sayed Ali case, would persist. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2008

T. Kaliamurthi and anr. Vs. Five Gori Thaikal Wakf and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2008

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 134, 134A, 134B, 142 and 144; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 10, 27, 28, 31, 52A and 107 - Articles 64, 65, 94 and 96; Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 83, 85, 107, 112, 112(1), 112(2) and 112(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; ;Tamil Nadu Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 59A and 59B; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 59A, 59B and 66G; Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1984; Public Property (Extension of the Limitation) Act, 1959; Public Works (Extension of Limitation) Act; Administration of Evacuee property Act, 1950 - Sections 58 and 58(3)

Reported in : AIR2009SC840; 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)462; (SCSuppl)2009(1)CHN25; JT2008(9)SC115; 2009(1)MhLj43; (2008)7MLJ534(SC); 2008(11)SCALE52; (2008)9SCC306

effect of reviving the barred claim. Relying on Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 the learned Counsel for the appellants argued that when … dismissing the suit on limitation, the trial court held that in view of Section 31 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the claim could not be revived under the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. Feeling aggrieved by the … 134B, 142 or 144 the claim had become barred long, long before the year 1955. The effect of Section 28 of the Limitation Act was that the right to the property was extinguished resulting in conferment of a … submitted that the Wakf Act only kept alive the appurtenant etc. or administrative actions in its negative sense but destroyed that vested rights in positive

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 10 1999

Smt. Bindu Garg Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963; Indian Stamp (Haryana Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 47A

Reported in : (1999)122PLR794

and this Court ultimately fixed the market value at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per square yards. In Administrator General of West Bengal's case (supra) this court upheld rejection of the small plots of lands and accepted … the notification Ex.P.36 under Section 4 of the Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was issued on January 5, 1978. As such the sale instances do not reflect a fair market value … land intended to be acquired was 331.58 acres, but possession of only 287.64 acres was taken.2. The Land Acquisition Collector after granting opportunity to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1965

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1965

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 21(4), 23(1) and 36; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

Matched in: Advocate R.C. Chaudhry,; C.M. Nayar,; M.B. Singh,; L.D. Kaushal, Sr. Deputy Adv. General and; P.R. Jain, Adv.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2006

P.S.R. Krishna and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep., by Its Secretar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-27-2006

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 1(2), 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(6), 5(7), 14, 19, 25, 28, 35 and 36; Employees Provident Fund Act; Central Excise Act; Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 139A, 226, 226(1), 226(2), 226A, 227, 309, 323A and 323B; Constitution of India (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (Forty Second Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India (Forty Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11, 15 to 20, 23, 24, 25 and 141; Telecom Engineering Services Class-l Recruitment Rules, 1965; Indian Telecommunication Services (Group-A) Recruitment Rules, 1992; C

Reported in : 2006(6)ALT593

Matched in: Advocate Nooty Ram Mohan Rao, ;J. Sudheer and ;V. Hari Haran, Advs. P.P. Malhotra, Addl Solicitor General for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 1995

Agricultural Produce Marketing Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-26-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)57ITD109(Delhi)

not. He referred to the provisions of Section 3 (31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, wherein "local authority" has been defined to mean a … WR 460, the Supreme Court has held that a Marketing Committee functioning under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963, is a local authority for the purpose of Section 6 of the I.T. Act. In para 4 of … and the conditions of the licence granted under the said Act. The said Committee is further empowered Under Section 28 of the said Act to levy and collect market fees, as may be determined by the Administrator from … collection of such other agricultural produce in the market area as the Administrator may notify in the official gazette. It is also empowered to take

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2006

G. Narasimha Murthy Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-2006

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 28, 29, 29(2), 35, 35(1), 35(2) and 36; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 22(1), 22(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43 and 43(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 59, 80, 92, 113, 115 and 122 - Order 47; Conditions of Service Order, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 17, 17(2), 18 and 19; Central Hindi Directorate (Class III and Class IV) Posts Recruitment Rules, 1961 - Rules 4, 6, 6(1) and 7; Central Administrative Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1987 - Rules 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 26, 30,

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD370; 2006(3)ALT433

Matched in: Advocate Rama Rao, ;Subrahmanya Sarma, ;Krishna Murtby, ;C. Sai Reddy, ;P. Venkataswamy, ;C. Nagaiab, ;K. Satyanarayana Rao, ;K. Umapati and ;G. Tuhini Kumar, Advs. Government Pleader for Services II, Assistant Solicitor General

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1977

Union of India Vs. D.K. Gupta of Sudhir Brothers

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-1977

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 13(1977)DLT334; 1978RLR476

on the ground that the procedure prescribed by Article 64 of the General Conditions of Contract was 'not only cumbersome but wholly illusory and was … The proceedings remained adjourned for sometime and were resumed on 8th March, 1963. The learned Single Judge after referring to the record of the arbitrators … 20th February, 1965. On or about 11th February, 1965, the appellants moved an application in the Court under section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter to be called 'the Act') seeking extension of time to enable the … held on 20th February, 1965, the parties filed list of witnesses whom they wanted to examine. The Railway Administration also produced certain documents. According to the claimant the matter was fixed for hearing for 21st and 22nd

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2008

The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu High Cour ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-20-2008

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1913 - Sections 20; Administrators General (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 25; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 30, 31(2) and 48B; Companies Act - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680

Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated … the respondent/Housing Board for a public purpose, viz. Housing scheme by the respondent/Board, for which, a notice under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 30.10.1985, an enquiry under Section 5A of the Land … the Official Trustee to sell the remaining lands measuring an extent of 287 grounds 2208 sq.ft. situated at Medawalkam. 5.2. The AGOT thereafter filed an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial