Advanced Search Results

The Public Information Officer / the Administrator General and Officia ...

Court : Chennai

G.K.Jayajothimurugan, W.P.No.27151 of 2023, dated 26.03.2024, to buttress his point. He sought to apply Section 49 of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and claimed exemption from the Right to Information Act, 2005, when it involves disclosure of the identity of

Sri. Nanjavadootha Swamiji vs Sri S. Linganna

Court : Karnataka

Allahabad High Court in the case of Umesh Chandra Saxena vs. Administrative General reported in AIR 1999 All 109 at para 46 has held as … of same having been barred by limitation in view of provisions contained in Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, contending that:(a) the Testator namely Sri.Guru KumaraAvadootha Swamiji, had filed a suit in O.S.No.98/1988 against one Sri.P.L.Ramachandrappa, the … this concisely, a suit ordinarily can be defined as a proceeding instituted by the presentation of a `plaint' (Section 26 read withOrder VII Rule 1) in a Civil Court resulting into adecree (section 33). However, these ingredients lack … filed a suit in O.S.No.1/1996 for framing of the scheme for proper administration of the mutt. The said suit was dismissed on 28.07.2016.(f) That since

Guna Gaonkar and anr. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 55 - Schedule - Articles 26, 114, 250 and 255; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 378(2) and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 9 to 18 and 22

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR389; 2006(3)BomCR46

on 31.1.01 against its order dated 8.3.2000 to be considered by the General Body of the Devasthan in terms of the provisions comprised under the … the applicability or non-applicability of the provisions of law comprised under Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 of the Limitation Act which deals with the power to condone the delay specifically provides that : … order, the petitioners have filed the present petition.3. Drawing attention to Articles 26, 250 and 255 of the said Devasthan Regulation, as well as Section … Khandeparkar R.M.S., J. 1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 21.5.2001 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Goa in Devasthan Appeal No. 46/01 as being contrary to the provisions of law comprised under the

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

of the periodof limitation are contained in Sections 12 to 24 included in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 is not a provision dealing with “computation of the period of limitation”. It is only after the … and the Judge (Revisions) Sales tax exercising jurisdiction under the Sales Tax Act, are “courts”. They are merely Administrative Tribunals and “not courts”. Section 14, Limitation Act, therefore, does not, in terms apply to proceedings before such … 5 must receive liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in bringing the appeal are required to be condoned in the … High Court and the same came to be dismissed vide order dated 26.02.2015. The order of dismissal was further affirmed by this Court vide order

Agricultural Produce Marketing Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1996)57ITD109(Delhi)

not. He referred to the provisions of Section 3 (31) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, wherein "local authority" has been defined to mean a … WR 460, the Supreme Court has held that a Marketing Committee functioning under the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963, is a local authority for the purpose of Section 6 of the I.T. Act. In para 4 of … as may be prescribed and enforce the provisions of the Act. He further referred to the provisions of Section 26, whereunder a Market Committee can constitute one or more sub-committees and can also co-opt any person as member … collection of such other agricultural produce in the market area as the Administrator may notify in the official gazette. It is also empowered to take

The Buckingham and Carnatic Company Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ172

tax for municipal purposes and cannot be availed of for purposes of general revenue.3. The petitioner in W.P. No. 2191 of 1965 is the Buckingham … K. Veeraswami, J.1. The petitioners, who are affected by the provisions of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1963 (Madras Act XXXIV of 1963), assail its validity on grounds of legislative incompetency to enact it and of … excess payment. The urban land tax shall under Section 25 be a first charge upon the urban land. Section 26 provides for recovery of urban land tax from the occupier of the urban land in certain cases. Section … respondents, a more frequent revision of a final settlement scheme will be administratively impracticable and further such frequent revision will fail to ensure definiteness in

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Estate of V.L. Ethiraj (by Official Tru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 160(1), 161, 161(1) and 168; Indian Succession Act, 1925; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6)

Reported in : (1980)16CTR(Mad)238; [1979]120ITR271(Mad)

Act and the Administrators-General Act under which the assessee is exercising his powers. Section 7 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, directs that letters of administration shall be granted to the Administrator-General unless they are granted to the next-of-kin … which he settled the income from one of the properties belonging to him, namely, premises bearing door No. 26, Commander-in-Chief Road, Egmore, Madras, on his sister-in-law, Smt. Rathnavelu Govindaraju, and his niece, Smt. Lalitha Govindaraju, for a

Mrs. Gurnam Kaur Vs. Sh. Pritam Singh Bhatia and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

kindred to him, the properties shall go to the Government. Similarly, as per Section 10 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963, whenever any person has died leaving assets exceeding rupees fifty thousand in value and the High Court is … the year 1983 or 1991 as alleged by some of the Defendants and had executed a will dated 26.9.1961 which is the legal and proper will?. If so, to what effect?. Onus on the parties; 6. Whether

Lalithambika vs Grievance Redressal Committee

Court : Kerala

the locker. There is also no requirement to secure any letters of administration under Section 29 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963. There is also no case for the respondent Bank that there is any litigation instituted by … of administration from the petitioner.7. It is further pointed out that by virtue of Section 29 of theAdministrators-General Act, 1963, the petitioner is at liberty to secure necessary letter of administration or to resort to the provisions of … W.P.(C) No. 2665/2023 :1:IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE

BenjamIn H. Elias and ors. Vs. Official Trustee of West Bengal and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860; ;Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 7, 9 and 12; ;Official Trustees Act, 1930 - Sections 25 and 26; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 6

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN555

the trust property is vested in the Treasurer of Charitable Endowments, the Administrator General the Official Trustee, or any society registered under the Societies Registration … also pointed out that no appeal lies from an order passed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. He further submitted that an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is maintainable against an order … only possession had already been taken but reference was also sought for; the award of the Court under Section 26 enhancing the compensation was also accepted. The order of the Appellate Court has also become final. Under those