Advanced Search Results

The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu High Cour ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilTrusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1913 - Sections 20; Administrators General (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 25; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 5A, 6, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2), 30, 31(2) and 48B; Companies Act - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680

Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated … an order of probate under the Administrators General Act, 1913, held that:A grant of Letters of Administration under Section 20 of the Administrator-General's Act to the Administrator General in respect of the estate of a deceased Hindu vests

Lalithambika vs Grievance Redressal Committee

Court : Kerala

the locker. There is also no requirement to secure any letters of administration under Section 29 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963. There is also no case for the respondent Bank that there is any litigation instituted by … of administration from the petitioner.7. It is further pointed out that by virtue of Section 29 of theAdministrators-General Act, 1963, the petitioner is at liberty to secure necessary letter of administration or to resort to the provisions of … THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 25TH MAGHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 2665 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: 1 LALITHAMBIKA

K.R. Patel (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1), 160, 168 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 29 and 36; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 222, 302, 317 and 366; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 41 and 176(4); Administrators General Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1999SC3203; [1999]239ITR738(SC); JT1999(6)SC293; 1999(5)SCALE249; (1999)7SCC26; [1999]Supp2SCR44

hands under the provisions of Section 168 of the Act. High Court examined the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and held as under:It appears to be quite clear that though the … filed. Registration of the trust is effected only after the order is passed by the competent authority under Section 20 of that Act and entries made in the register. Registration of the trust under the Bombay Public Trust

Homi Nariman Bhiwandiwala Vs. Zoroastrian Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 164; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 50; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR352

Advocate for defendant No. 1 brought to my notice provisions of sections 29 and 31 of the Administrator General Act, 1963. The certificate is produced and the amount has been disbursed to defendant No. 2 in pursuance of the … deposited with the Bank. In view of the Will, defendant No. 1 took legal action by approaching the Administrator General and Administrator General has issued certificate in favour of the executors of the Will entitling them to … No. 1 and 2 have colluded witheach other as stated in paragraph 20 of the plaint No.(20) Does the plaintiff prove the correctness orparticulars of … Bank. The suit is not maintainable, firstly for want of notice under section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, secondly on the ground that

Earth Designers and Developers Private Limited, a Company Incorporated ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 20; ;Official Trustees Act, 1913; Development Control Regulations - Regulation 67; Constitution of India - Article 215; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2003(6)BomCR87; 2003CriLJ3785

clearly flows from the mandate of Section 20 of the Act. Moreover, even if the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 were inapplicable to the contempt proceeding, but the principle underlying Section 3 of the Limitation Act can be … against him. The backdrop in which the present petition has been filed is that, the Respondent is the Administrator General and official Trustee (sole trustee) of Shree Venkatesh Balaji Temple property situate at bangana road, Walkeshwar road,

P.S.Nalini vs Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

and quash the same and, consequently, direct the second respondent under the provisions of Section 25 of the Administrator General Act, 1963 read with Sec.7 of the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and the Rules made thereunder and … quash the same and, consequently, direct the second respondent under the provisions of Section 25 of the Administrator General Act, 1963 read with Sec.7 of the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and the Rules made thereunder and take over charge … OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.No.17168 of 2025 P.S.Nalini W/o.Anand Swaminathan Petitioner Vs1. Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

of the periodof limitation are contained in Sections 12 to 24 included in Part III of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 is not a provision dealing with “computation of the period of limitation”. It is only after the … exercising jurisdiction under the Sales Tax Act, are “courts”. They are merely Administrative Tribunals and “not courts”. Section 14, Limitation Act, therefore, does not, in … 5 must receive liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in bringing the appeal are required to be condoned in the … Section 19 only. The Appellate Tribunal has been conferred the power to condone delay beyond 45 days under Section 20(3) of the Act. The proceedings before the Recovery Officer are not before a Tribunal. Section 24 is limited

Rajiv Tandon Vs. the Government of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

rejection of the representation, i.e., 02.06.2000 by calculating the same under the general law of limitation. It is no doubt true that it has not … v T. P. Kunhaliumma [(1976) 4 SCC 634] has held that the residuary Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would be applicable when an application may not be in a ‘court’. This judgment was not referred to … in a case where a final order such as is mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 20 has been made in connection with the grievance unless the application is made, within one year from the … therefore, the period of limitation as envisaged under Section 21 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act of 1985)

E. Shankar Reddy S/O. E. Nagi Reddy, Inspector of Police Vs. P. Ramase ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 19 and 20; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) District Police Act, 1859 - Sections 8 and 10; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) District Police Act, 1329 - Sections 6; Hyderabad City Police Act, 1309 - Sections 7; Hyderabad City Police (Amendment) Act, 1348; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 226 and 309; Andhra Pradesh Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1966 - Rules 2, 5 and 6; Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1963 - Rules 5(1) and 12(2); Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1962 - Rule 3(15); Special Rules - Rules 10(1) and 15; General Rules - Rule 33; Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 35; Andhra Pradesh State and Subord

Reported in : 2008(6)ALT738

Matched in: Advocate B. Adinarayana Rao, Adv. in WP No. 27749 of 2007, ;K. Lakshmi Narasimha, Adv. in WP No. 27708 of 2007, ;D. Linga Rao, Adv. in WP No. 14433 of 2008 and ;K. Sudhakar Reddy, Adv. in WP No. 28373 of 2007 GP for Services 1/Adv. General for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 in WP Nos. 27749, 27708 and 28373 of 2007 and 14433 of 2008, ;D. Prakash Reddy, Sr. Adv. for ;P. Raghavendra Reddy, Adv. for Respondent No. 11

Kutchi Lal Rameshwar Ashram Trust Evam Anna Kshetra Trust Thr. Velji D ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

pass an order under Section 29 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in view of the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963”. Leave was granted on 12 May 2009. Relying upon the initial order, which confined the notice to a … ORS. .....RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J1This appeal has arisen from a judgment rendered on 15 May 2007 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. Finding no substance in the writ