Advanced Search Results

Thayarammal (Dead) by Lr. Vs. Kanakammal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1963; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 10; Evidence Act; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 6(5), 6(17), 9, 23 and 24; Transfer of Property Act; Indian Trusts Act; Hindu Law; Roman Law; Tamil Nadu Charitable and Religious Endowments Act, 1955; Indian Succession Act

Reported in : JT2005(11)SC277; 2004(10)SCALE22; (2005)1SCC457

decree granted by the two courts below has been modified with directions to the Administrator General under the Administrators-General Act No. 45 of 1963 and the Official Trustee of Madras under Official Trustees Act No. 2 of 1913 … is submitted that the property described as Dharmachatram is covered by definition of the word 'Charitable Endowments' in Section 6(5) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1959 (hereinafter shortly referred to as the

K.R. Patel (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1), 160, 168 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 29 and 36; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 222, 302, 317 and 366; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 41 and 176(4); Administrators General Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1999SC3203; [1999]239ITR738(SC); JT1999(6)SC293; 1999(5)SCALE249; (1999)7SCC26; [1999]Supp2SCR44

in July, 1962 disclosing total value of the estate as Rs. 19 lakhs. Assessment was completed on March 17, 1963 on a total value of the estate of Rs. 24 lakhs. The estate duty amounting to little … hands under the provisions of Section 168 of the Act. High Court examined the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and held as under:It appears to be quite clear that though the

State of Kerala Vs. K. T. Suaduli Grocery Dealer Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1977)6CTR(SC)260

proceeded to make a best judgment assessment under Section 17, sub-section (3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act 1963. The assessee appealed but without success and this was followed by a revision application to the High Court. … to comply with the fundamental rules of Justice which have come to be known in the jurisprudence of administrative law as principles of natural justice. It is, however, necessary to remember that the rules of natural justice

Virendra Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Adminstrators General Act, 1963 - Sections 51; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC6

in this petition) and the Administrator General took possession of the property in question.5. Section 51 of the Administrators General Act, 1963 provides':'All assets in the charge of the Administrator General which have been in his custody for a period … to have any right of administration in the said property after the year 1985.6. It appears that on 17.3.1992 the Administrator General executed a lease deed for 90 years in favour of the respondent Nos. 8 to

Homi Nariman Bhiwandiwala Vs. Zoroastrian Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 164; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 50; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR352

Advocate for defendant No. 1 brought to my notice provisions of sections 29 and 31 of the Administrator General Act, 1963. The certificate is produced and the amount has been disbursed to defendant No. 2 in pursuance of the … deposited with the Bank. In view of the Will, defendant No. 1 took legal action by approaching the Administrator General and Administrator General has issued certificate in favour of the executors of the Will entitling them to … Bank. The suit is not maintainable, firstly for want of notice under section 164 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, secondly on the ground that … in the negative.18. Issue No. 16:---This issue does not arise.19. Issue No. 17:---It was conceded that no permission of the Charity Commissioner is required to

Kutchi Lal Rameshwar Ashram Trust Evam Anna Kshetra Trust Thr. Velji D ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

pass an order under Section 29 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in view of the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963”. Leave was granted on 12 May 2009. Relying upon the initial order, which confined the notice to a … notice was issued initially, leave having been granted thereafter, “all the contentions of the parties are now open”. 17 We respectfully reiterate and adopt this view which is based on a sagacious approach to the constitutional powers

Prakash Singh Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

enumerated in sub-sections (1) or (2). 7. The petitioner, however, relies on Section 17 (1)(c) of the Limitation Act, 1963 which reads:- 17. Effect of fraud or mistake (1) Where, in the case of any suit or application … this writ petition assails the order dated 11th September, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal, for short), whereby OA No.2719/2014 stands dismissed on the ground of limitation. 2. The … promotes in various CATs/High Courts. AND WHEREAS the judgments of Courts are generally department specific and department specific judgment cannot be implemented across the board

Rajesh Subrahmanya Kallage vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

State of Karnataka and he was entitled to be considered as a general category candidate in respect of an insider seat/vacancy meant for general category … only upon the petitioner/ applicant discovering the fraud or mistake by referring to Section 17(1)(c) of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Division Bench rejected the said argument of the petitioner on interpretation of Section 21(1) and 21(2) of … The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.643/2017. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has dismissed the original application of the petitioner

SadruddIn Suleman Jhaveri Vs. J.H. Patwardhan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 245, 254(2), 358 and 366(10); Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2) and 3(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 9, 17(1), 17(3) and 17(4); Bombay Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2), 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1965Bom224; (1965)67BOMLR101; ILR1965Bom394; 1965MhLJ290

Matched in: Advocate J.C. Bhatt, ;R.L. Dalal and ;R.J. Bhatt, Advs., i/b., Ambubhai and Diwanji, Attorneys Adv. General and ;A.M. Setalvad, Adv., i/b., Little and Co., Attorneys

Chidananda Urs B.g Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … the Anti Corruption Bureau (‘ACB’ for short) for the purpose of investigation in consonance with the provisions of Section 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (‘PC Act’ for short). By Annexure-G notification, the Government of Karnataka has … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS