Advanced Search Results

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

the learned counsel for the petitioner, it would be convenienl to refer to the relevant provisions of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 6 of the Administrators General Act (the … lhat wouldhave been so the provisions for revoking the saidorder under Section 383 of the Act or Section 14of the Administrators General Act would not bethere. In fact, even under Section 11 of the Ad-ministrator General Act

Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11(1), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14A, 14A(7), 15, 18 and 18(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 18, 100, 100(4), 100(5), - Order 20, Rule 4(2) - Order 41, Rule 33; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 5(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 9; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 7B(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130E; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Sections 4, 17 and 27; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985; Special Relief Act, 1963; Administrative Procedure Act; Taft-Hartley Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Sea Customs Act - Sections 188; General Clauses Act - Sections 14

Reported in : (2003)3SCC186; [2002]SUPP5SCR222

Matched in: Advocate Soli J. Sorabjee, Attornery General,; Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Solicitor General,;

Harshawadan Bandivadekar Vs. Taramati Harishchandra Ghanekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 15(2), 19 and 20; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24 and 29(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 43; Constitution of India - Articles 129 and 215; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR170

than a year had elapsed from the alleged act of contempt and the contemnor could not avail of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, however, stated that it was not expressing any view … a contempt proceedings.f) (Earth Designers and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. M.K. Patil, Administrator General and Official Trustee of Maharasthra State) : (2006)6SCC566 .The learned Single … the respondent Nos. 1-6 have not shown 'sufficient cause' within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in their Affidavit in Support of Notice of Motion No. 186/2007, nor have they fully explained the cause

Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Vijay Hosiery Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Carriage by Air Act, 1972 - Sections 4 and 30(1); Carriage by Air Rules - Rules 5, 10(1), 11(1), 12(4), 13, 13(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rules 2(1) and 16 - Order 7, Rules 10, 11 and 13 - Order 25, Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : III(2006)BC515; 129(2006)DLT50

He further submitted that while the plaintiff has not filed any application under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for exclusion of the time spent before the Court at Ludhiana, Section 14 of the Limitation Act would … He also relied upon the decisions on the following two decisions: Parameswaraan v. N. Ramachandran : AIR1987Ker37 and Administrator General, West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Basu and Ors. 1974 CWN 23 (paragraph 12 and 13). He submitted

Chidananda Urs B.g Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS

Sri. K.t. Nagaraja Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS

Sri T N Rangaswamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS

Sri. Basavaraj Alias Sachin Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS

The Advocates Association Bengaluru Vs. The Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS

Sri Sidharth Bhupal Shingadi, Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Lokayukta Arguments advanced by Sri 152-163 Prabhuling K. Navadgi, XIII learned Advocate General for the respondent/State XIV Points for determination 163-164 XV Consideration 164-280 XVI … 1st respondent cannot constitute an independent Police Force when the field is occupied by 55 the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The Lokayukta Police was established under the provisions of the KL Act and therefore backed by statute. However, … contemplated are of civil nature ultimately resulting in reports and recommending appropriate action to be taken thereon. Under Section 14 of KL Act, when Lokayukta is satisfied that public servant has committed any 'criminal offence’ and should 83 … THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA REPRESENTED BY ITS