Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 section 11 · Page 1 of about 7,520 results (0.124 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 1996

The Administrator General Vs. Vinod Bhushan Alias Kamal NaraIn and Oth ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-15-1996

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 9, 9(1) and (2), 10 and 11; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(5) and (6) and 10; Administrator General Act, 1913; Charitable and Religious Trust Act - Sections 34 and 37

Reported in : AIR1996All350

the record.17. Order accordingly. TrustS and societies - management of trust property - Sections 9 and 10 of Administrators General Act, 1963 and Section 10 of Official Trustees Act, 1913 - application filed for grant of letter of administration in … of kin or where the next of kin does not take steps to obtain the Letters of Administration.10. Section 11 of the Act goes a step further and states that if in the course of the proceedings to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2003

Virendra Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-01-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Adminstrators General Act, 1963 - Sections 51; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC6

in this petition) and the Administrator General took possession of the property in question.5. Section 51 of the Administrators General Act, 1963 provides':'All assets in the charge of the Administrator General which have been in his custody for a period … an absolute bar to a writ petition. In Mohd. Nooh's case, the Supreme Court even observed (vide para 11) :'If an inferior Court or Tribunal of first instance acts wholly without jurisdiction or patently in excess of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1999

K.R. Patel (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1), 160, 168 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 29 and 36; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 222, 302, 317 and 366; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 41 and 176(4); Administrators General Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1999SC3203; [1999]239ITR738(SC); JT1999(6)SC293; 1999(5)SCALE249; (1999)7SCC26; [1999]Supp2SCR44

hands under the provisions of Section 168 of the Act. High Court examined the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 and the Official Trustees Act, 1913 and held as under:It appears to be quite clear that though the … in the name of Karamchand Ambalal & Co. or to sell the same as a going concern. Clauses 11, 15, 16 and 20 of the Will are particularly relevant for purposes of this appeal and are as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 2005

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 2 to 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 11(8), 11(9), 11(10), 12, 12(3), 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18 to 27, 28 to 33, 34 to 37, 37(2), 44 to 60, 61 to 81 and 82 to 86; Arbitration Act, 1859; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 to 43 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43; United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859; Arbitration Act, 1899; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 7 and 35; Foreign

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

(UNCITRAL) has adopted a Model Law for International Commercial Arbitration and the General Assembly of the United Nations has recommended that all countries give due … to approach the Supreme Court is saved. Chapter X deals with miscellaneous matters. Section 43 makes the Limitation Act, 1963 applicable to proceedings under the Act as it applies to proceedings in Court.7. We will first consider the … 3205/2004, 14033-14034/2004, 21272-273/2002.1. What is the nature of the function of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the question that is posed before us. The three judges … Ltd. : [2002]1SCR728 has taken the view that it is purely an administrative function, that it is neither judicial nor quasi-judicial and the Chief Justice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1992

Sodha Parmar Chhanabhai Gandabhai Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-01-1992

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1993)1GLR738

10 came to the Office of the said Market Committee arid stated that they have been appointed as Administrators of the said Market Committee. Hence, the petitioner has applied to the District Registrar, Kheda at Nadiad, for … power without there being any election.8. As against this, learned Additional Advocate General Mr. Raval appearing on behalf of respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and … 1991 to point out that by exercise of powers under Section 11(2)(a) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963, the Director has nominated the members on the Market Committee for a period upto 31st December, 1991. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1996

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-18-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

the learned counsel for the petitioner, it would be convenienl to refer to the relevant provisions of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and to certain provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 6 of the Administrators General Act (the … 383 of the Act or Section 14of the Administrators General Act would not bethere. In fact, even under Section 11 of the Ad-ministrator General Act if in Ihe course of pro-.ceedings initiated by the Administrator Generalfor grant of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2017

Kutchi Lal Rameshwar Ashram Trust Evam Anna Kshetra Trust Thr. Velji D ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

pass an order under Section 29 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 in view of the provisions of the Administrators-General Act, 1963”. Leave was granted on 12 May 2009. Relying upon the initial order, which confined the notice to a … payments made by him to respect of such assets which a private administrator might lawfully have made.” Under Section 11, the High Court is empowered to grant probate or letters of administration to any other person who appears

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1967

Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath Vs. Janardan Vishwanath Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43, 46, 47 and 49; ;Maharashtra Presidency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969Bom111; (1968)70BOMLR376; ILR1969Bom766

by law'. It was held by the Privy Council in Hook v. Administrator General 48 Ind App 187= (AIR 1921 PC 11) that the plea … trying the title thereto.6. Extensive amendments were made Chapter VII by the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1963 (Act No.41 of 1963) which came into force on the 28th of November 1963. The first of such … As to the first part of this question, namely, whether the suit is barred by res judicata under Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, the position is quite clear, for the matter does not fall within the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2006

Guna Gaonkar and anr. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 55 - Schedule - Articles 26, 114, 250 and 255; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 378(2) and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 9 to 18 and 22

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR389; 2006(3)BomCR46

on 31.1.01 against its order dated 8.3.2000 to be considered by the General Body of the Devasthan in terms of the provisions comprised under the … the applicability or non-applicability of the provisions of law comprised under Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Section 5 of the Limitation Act which deals with the power to condone the delay specifically provides that : … Khandeparkar R.M.S., J. 1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 21.5.2001 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Goa in Devasthan Appeal No. 46/01 as being contrary to the provisions of law comprised under the … respondent No. 3. The elections thereupon were scheduled to take place on 11.3.2000. The respondents No. 3 and 4 meanwhile filed an appeal before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1975

The State of Gujarat Vs. Dhirajlal Amratlal Kansara and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-20-1975

Subject : CivilService

Reported in : (1975)16GLR982

of the Chief Officer who was appointed as the Chief Officer under Section 47(1) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 had expired on February 29, 1972. By an order dated March 1, 1972 (vide Ex. 11) passed by … contention, Mr. Patel invited our attention to Section 19 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 (Bombay Act No. 1 of 1904), which provides as … Sessions Judge, Surendranagar. It was contended before the learned Sessions Judge, that the in-charge Chief Officer can exercise administrative functions and cannot exercise any statutory powers. The learned Sessions Judge took the view that the in-charge Chief

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial