Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: administrators general act 1963 chapter 4 · Page 1 of about 2,474 results (0.145 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 2004

Thayarammal (Dead) by Lr. Vs. Kanakammal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2004

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Administrators General Act, 1963; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 10; Evidence Act; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 6(5), 6(17), 9, 23 and 24; Transfer of Property Act; Indian Trusts Act; Hindu Law; Roman Law; Tamil Nadu Charitable and Religious Endowments Act, 1955; Indian Succession Act

Reported in : JT2005(11)SC277; 2004(10)SCALE22; (2005)1SCC457

decree granted by the two courts below has been modified with directions to the Administrator General under the Administrators-General Act No. 45 of 1963 and the Official Trustee of Madras under Official Trustees Act No. 2 of 1913 … modified with directions to the Administrator General under the Administrators-General Act No. 45 of 1963 and the Official Trustee of Madras under Official Trustees Act … institutions like Sarais and Dharmachatra which are resting places. A hymn addressed to the Maruti (winds) (Rigveda Ashtka Chapter IV) speaks of refreshments 'being ready at the resting places on the road.' This hymn indicates the existence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2009

Shobhnath Dube Vs. Smt. Tara Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-17-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All187; 2009(3)AWC2852

be included therein. The expression 'next of kin' has also been defined in Section 2 (c) of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and includes a widow or widower or other person to whom letters of administration can be granted. Chapter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1996

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 9, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1, 2, 3 and 4), 16, 16(1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), 17, 18, 19(1), 29, 29(2), 32, 38, 39, 39A, 41, 46, 226, 323, 323(A and B) and 323A(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 14, 15 and 28; Chancery Procedure Act - Sections 50; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 39; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 11-A, 22A; Constitution First Amendment Act, 1951; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 10(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 497; Punjab Prisons Service (Class II) Rules, 1963; Constitution (42nd) Amendment Act, 1977 - Article 323-A; Industria

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

under our constitutional system is among equals and similarly situated. Equality in general cannot be universally applied and is subject to conditions and restrictions as … power to grant such a decree independently of the requirements of the Section.'Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 replaced Section 42 of the earlier Act and provided,'Any person entitled to any legal Character, or to any … constitutional validity of Regulation 5 of the Panjab University Calendar contained in Chapter VII(ii). The matter has been referred to this Bench vide order of … of the impugned Rule of the Punjab University Calendar, admittedly applicable in the Colleges run by the Chandigarh Administration, the decision of which was conveyed to him vide Annexure P/1. Annexure P/1 and the Rule is alleged … Sanskrit in the Government College of Girls, Sector 42, Chandigarh on 17-8-1987 where he continued as Head

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 06 2018

K. Lakshiminarayanan Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Central Government means the President and include in relation to the administration of a Union Territory, the administrator thereof. It is submitted that the President has framed Rules of Business … made by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 3(3) of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1963”), to the Legislative Assembly of Union Territory of Puducherry has been dismissed.2. … the Government” as occurring in Rule 4(2). Therefore, Rule 4(2) read with Chapter IV of the Rules of Business, cover the entire gamut of executive

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2002

Bhawani Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff) Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 9, 11 and 19; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 39, 41, 42 and 254(2)

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1755; 2002(5)WLN269

Matched in: Advocate Sagar Mal Mehta, Adv. General, assisted by; Sandeep Bhandawat, Adv.; R.P. Dave,; Kusum Rao and; S.R. Sharma, Advs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1963

Chandulal Jethalal Jayaswal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-26-1963

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India- Articles 19, 265, 301 and 304; Bombay Prohabition Act - Sections 2, 59C and 59D; Gujarat Denatured Spirituous Preparations Rules, 1962 - Rules 22 and 37

Reported in : AIR1964Guj59; (1963)GLR1033

Matched in: Citation AIR1964Guj59; (1963)GLR1033

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1967

Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath Vs. Janardan Vishwanath Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1967

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43, 46, 47 and 49; ;Maharashtra Presidency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969Bom111; (1968)70BOMLR376; ILR1969Bom766

trying the title thereto.6. Extensive amendments were made Chapter VII by the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1963 (Act No.41 of 1963) which came into force on the 28th of November 1963. The first of such … of substance within the limits allowed by law'. It was held by the Privy Council in Hook v. Administrator General 48 Ind App 187= (AIR 1921 PC 11) that the plea of res judicata still remains apart … and thereupon, the plaintiff terminated agreement and filed an application under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (Ejectment Application No.8/177 E

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2019

The Deputy Commissioner And Vs. M/S S v Global Mill Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

VAT Act states that in computing the period of limitation under that Chapter, the provisions of Sections 4 and 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 … the maxim interest reipublicae up sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). Rules of limitation are … 2013 Act. Consequently, the application seeking condonation of delay has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Limitation Act for the sake of brevity).5. Learned senior counsel and learned counsel … There is yet another point which leads to the same conclusion. If the award is treated as an administrative decision taken by the Collector in the matter of the valuation of the property sought to be acquired

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2019

Union of India vs.m/s Associated Construction Co

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-15-2019

Subject : Arbitration

makes it clear that the act has an overriding effect on the general laws. It is thus, contended that while deciding the present application, the … with the contract, hence, the present appeal.3. Applications being CM APPLs 3178/2018 (application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal) and 3180/2018 (application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 … the High Court Bill of 2009 has been earmarked below: - “ Chapter III NEED TO UPDATE AND REFRAME THE COMMERCIAL DIVISION OF THE HIGH … to take a decision regarding the future course of action. It is highlighted in paragraph 10 that an administrative route involving the concerned authority in hierarchy is necessary to be followed, which is reproduced below: i.e. “(1) … the claims by awarding a sum of Rs. 49,25,240/- against claim No.5 and by rendering simple interest

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2006

Firdous Omer (D) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. Bankim Chandra Daw (D) by Lrs. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-28-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) - Order 9, Rules 3, 4, 8 and 9 - Order 21 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2006SC2759; 2007(1)AWC36(SC); [2006(4)JCR84(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC545; (2006)4MLJ1714(SC); RLW2007(1)SC191; 2006(7)SCALE439; (2006)6SCC569

Letters Patent and was hence appealable. This view of the Calcutta High Court had been followed in The Administrative General of West Bengal v. Kumar Purnendu Nath Tagore : AIR1970Cal231 , wherein the Court reiterated, that a … the Limitation Act, which is 30 days from the date of dismissal, under Article 122 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Apparently, under the practice followed in the Calcutta High Court on the Original Side, the order is drawn … trial judge in the special list in terms of Rule 35 of Chapter X of the Original Side Rules.4. Thus, the suit appeared in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial