Advanced Search Results

Abdul Razack Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 4, 9 and 14(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 252 and 252(1); Constitution of India - Articles 50, 219, 226, 227, 233, 235, 236 and 309; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963 - Rules 4, 8 and 13 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD234; 1999(1)ALT346

Matched in: Advocate Mr. J. Sudheer, Adv. Mr. Vaidyanathan, Addl. Solicitor-General of India, ;Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, SC for Central Govt., ;Mr. G. Raghuram, ;Mr. N. Rama Mohan Rao and ;Mr. N.V.S.J. Rama Rao, Advs.

Guna Gaonkar and anr. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 55 - Schedule - Articles 26, 114, 250 and 255; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 378(2) and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 9 to 18 and 22

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR389; 2006(3)BomCR46

on 31.1.01 against its order dated 8.3.2000 to be considered by the General Body of the Devasthan in terms of the provisions comprised under the … Articles 26, 250 and 255 of the said Devasthan Regulation, as well as Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submitted that in terms of the said provisions of law, the … to the Administrative Tribunal. 8. Article 250 which is found in the Chapter relating to the appeals in the said Devasthan Regulations provides that: The … Khandeparkar R.M.S., J. 1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 21.5.2001 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Goa in Devasthan Appeal No. 46/01 as being contrary to the provisions of law comprised under the

Shobhnath Dube Vs. Smt. Tara Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All187; 2009(3)AWC2852

be included therein. The expression 'next of kin' has also been defined in Section 2 (c) of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and includes a widow or widower or other person to whom letters of administration can be granted. Chapter … did not lodge a caveat, which according to the appellant was a necessary requirement under Chapter XXX, Rule 35 of the Rules of the Court. The learned single Judge has held that a caveat need not be

Sri Sri Sri Lakshamana Yatendrulu and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of An ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 2(29), 16, 18 to 22, 25, 28, 29, 39, 47 to 55 and 91; Consitution of India - Articles 25 and 26; Agamashastra Pandit Service Rules, 1987; Predecessor Act, 1966 - Sections 16 and 47; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Court of Wards Act, 1902; Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Courts of Wards Act, 1350-F

Reported in : AIR1996SC1414; JT1996(1)SC535; 1996(4)KarLJ394; 1996(1)SCALE543; (1996)8SCC705; [1996]1SCR929

and is answerable as such. The definition of 'trustee' was used to reiterate the position he holds in general law of trust in relation to maths and in law he is enjoined to hold it as trustee. … the vires of Sections 2(22), 2(27) and Sections 47 to 55 in Chapter V of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments … of the employees of the maths may be disciples themselves; their appointment, removal, dismissal etc. being matters of administration by the math idiopathic for due management of the math, interference by Commissioner in that behalf is also … V of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 (30 of 1987) (for short, 'the Act'). But at the time … the reason that they are not excluded. Sections 34 and 35, therefore, by implication stand attracted to

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 21(4), 23(1) and 36; Constitution of India - Article 22

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

Matched in: Advocate R.C. Chaudhry,; C.M. Nayar,; M.B. Singh,; L.D. Kaushal, Sr. Deputy Adv. General and; P.R. Jain, Adv.

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 9, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1, 2, 3 and 4), 16, 16(1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), 17, 18, 19(1), 29, 29(2), 32, 38, 39, 39A, 41, 46, 226, 323, 323(A and B) and 323A(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 14, 15 and 28; Chancery Procedure Act - Sections 50; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 39; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 11-A, 22A; Constitution First Amendment Act, 1951; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 10(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 497; Punjab Prisons Service (Class II) Rules, 1963; Constitution (42nd) Amendment Act, 1977 - Article 323-A; Industria

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

under our constitutional system is among equals and similarly situated. Equality in general cannot be universally applied and is subject to conditions and restrictions as … power to grant such a decree independently of the requirements of the Section.'Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 replaced Section 42 of the earlier Act and provided,'Any person entitled to any legal Character, or to any … constitutional validity of Regulation 5 of the Panjab University Calendar contained in Chapter VII(ii). The matter has been referred to this Bench vide order of … of the impugned Rule of the Punjab University Calendar, admittedly applicable in the Colleges run by the Chandigarh Administration, the decision of which was conveyed to him vide Annexure P/1. Annexure P/1 and the Rule is alleged … 1977 Serv LJ 55 : (AIR 1976 Delhi 302). Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has, however,

Syed Fateyab Ali Meerza Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Moorshedabad Act, 1891 - Sections 3, 3(1), 5, 5(3) and 6;; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31, 31C, 226, 291, 300A, 362, 372 and 372(1);; West Bengal Murshidabad Estate (Trust) Act, 1963 - Sections 2(1), (5), (7), (9) and (10), 5(1) and (3), 6 and 10;; West Bengal Murshidabad Estate (Management of Properties) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1980 - Sections 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 15;; Moorshedabad Estate Administration Act, 1933 - Section 5;; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 177 and 296;; Indian Independence (Rights, Properties and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 8;; Murshidabad Estate Administration (Amendment) Act, 1959;; West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948;; Unauthorised Occupants Act (Public Premises) Act, 1971;; Maharashtra Housing a

Reported in : AIR1991Cal205

obtained Rule being C. R. No.435(W) of 1962.6. The West Bengal Legislative Assembly passed the Murshidabad Estate (Trust) Act, 1963 which got the assent of the Governor on 18th February, 1963 but no assent by the President was … managed the said Estate.5. The petitioner further states that by virtue of Chapter III of the Government of India Act, 1935 the properties of the … dignity, privileges and annuity till his death in 1959. In 1935 the Indian Legislature passed the Moorshedabad Estate Administration Act, 1933, inter alia, appointing a Manager on behalf of the Secretary of the State for India for … whichincluded Hazar Duari; and (c) the income ofimmoveable properties mentioned in the 3rdSchedule i.e. as purchased with the saleproceeds' of the jewels.2. According to the

Firdous Omer (D) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. Bankim Chandra Daw (D) by Lrs. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) - Order 9, Rules 3, 4, 8 and 9 - Order 21 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2006SC2759; 2007(1)AWC36(SC); [2006(4)JCR84(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC545; (2006)4MLJ1714(SC); RLW2007(1)SC191; 2006(7)SCALE439; (2006)6SCC569

Letters Patent and was hence appealable. This view of the Calcutta High Court had been followed in The Administrative General of West Bengal v. Kumar Purnendu Nath Tagore : AIR1970Cal231 , wherein the Court reiterated, that a … the Limitation Act, which is 30 days from the date of dismissal, under Article 122 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Apparently, under the practice followed in the Calcutta High Court on the Original Side, the order is drawn … trial judge in the special list in terms of Rule 35 of Chapter X of the Original Side Rules.4. Thus, the suit appeared in the … 1 also died and his legal representatives were also brought on record. 3. For about 15 long years, it seems that the suit was not

Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Th. Lr. . Vs. State of Kerala .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Kerala, as evidenced by later amendments making specific provisions in relation to Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple and its administration. Chapter II of Part I of the Act deals with the Travancore Devaswom Board, Section 2(c) defines the … No.1831 of 2009 was filed in the Court of Munsiff, Thiruvananthapuram by General Secretary of “Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple Staff Organisation” (respondent No.6 in appeal arising … the Covenant entered into on 27.05.1949, were subject matter of ceiling proceedings taken under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. The proceedings resulted in declaration that 191.23 acres out of the holding held by the respondent No.1 in … 2 respectively have filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.36487 of 2009

P. Sujanapal Vs. State of Kerala, represented by its Chief Secretary a ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Officer. (d) On 25.4.2013, writ petitioner preferred a complaint to the Registrar General of this Court seeking action against the third respondent judicial officer. In … him. Reliance is placed on the provisions of the Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850, the Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1963 and the Judges Protection Act, 1985 to contend that even in case of a mistaken or erroneous order, … provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Chapter XXI IPC except on a complaint made by some person aggrieved by … as this Court may deem fit to grant. 3. The facts and circumstances which led to the … be with corrupt motives. A Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Khanapuram Gandaiah v. Administrative Officer, Ranga Reddy District Courts and Others. [AIR 2009 AP 174] held that authorities discharging judicial functions are