Advanced Search Results

Guna Gaonkar and anr. Vs. Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29(2) and 55 - Schedule - Articles 26, 114, 250 and 255; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 58(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 378(2) and 417(4); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 4, 5, 9 to 18 and 22

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR389; 2006(3)BomCR46

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J. 1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 21.5.2001 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Goa in Devasthan Appeal No. 46/01 as being contrary to the provisions of law comprised under the … on 31.1.01 against its order dated 8.3.2000 to be considered by the General Body of the Devasthan in terms of the provisions comprised under the … Articles 26, 250 and 255 of the said Devasthan Regulation, as well as Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submitted that in terms of the said provisions of law, the … to the Administrative Tribunal. 8. Article 250 which is found in the Chapter relating to the appeals in the said Devasthan Regulations provides that: The

Shobhnath Dube Vs. Smt. Tara Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009All187; 2009(3)AWC2852

be included therein. The expression 'next of kin' has also been defined in Section 2 (c) of the Administrators General Act, 1963 and includes a widow or widower or other person to whom letters of administration can be granted. Chapter … the brother of Kashinath Dube and his case is that Kashinath Dube had executed an unregistered Will dated 14.12.2003 in his favour. On the death of Kashinath Dube he applied for grant of letters of administration. In

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

so, then such repeal will at once attract Section 6 of the General Clauses Act. In such a situation all prosecutions under the Indian Press … Assembly of Delhi and the Council stood abolished. In the 18 year 1953, the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 was enacted to provide for Legislative Assemblies and Council of Ministers for various Union Territories but the provisions … 6 apart from other aspects, that the language employed in the entire Chapter containing Article 239AA, unless appositely interpreted, shall denude the appellant, the National … categories, namely, States and Union Territories remained and Delhi became a Union Territory to be administered by an administrator appointed by the President. The Legislative Assembly of Delhi and the Council stood abolished. In the 18 year … democracy……. 74­93 I. Collaborative federalism………………………. 93­100 J.Pragmatic federalism…………………………… 101­104 K. Concept of federal balance…………………… 104­108 Interpretation of

Dr. M.C. Sharma, Lecturer Vs. the Punjab University, Chandigarh and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 9, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1, 2, 3 and 4), 16, 16(1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), 17, 18, 19(1), 29, 29(2), 32, 38, 39, 39A, 41, 46, 226, 323, 323(A and B) and 323A(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 4, 14, 15 and 28; Chancery Procedure Act - Sections 50; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42; Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 39; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 11-A, 22A; Constitution First Amendment Act, 1951; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 10(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 497; Punjab Prisons Service (Class II) Rules, 1963; Constitution (42nd) Amendment Act, 1977 - Article 323-A; Industria

Reported in : AIR1997P& H87

under our constitutional system is among equals and similarly situated. Equality in general cannot be universally applied and is subject to conditions and restrictions as … power to grant such a decree independently of the requirements of the Section.'Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 replaced Section 42 of the earlier Act and provided,'Any person entitled to any legal Character, or to any … constitutional validity of Regulation 5 of the Panjab University Calendar contained in Chapter VII(ii). The matter has been referred to this Bench vide order of … of the impugned Rule of the Punjab University Calendar, admittedly applicable in the Colleges run by the Chandigarh Administration, the decision of which was conveyed to him vide Annexure P/1. Annexure P/1 and the Rule is alleged

Abdul Razack Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 4, 9 and 14(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 252 and 252(1); Constitution of India - Articles 50, 219, 226, 227, 233, 235, 236 and 309; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963 - Rules 4, 8 and 13 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD234; 1999(1)ALT346

Matched in: Advocate Mr. J. Sudheer, Adv. Mr. Vaidyanathan, Addl. Solicitor-General of India, ;Mr. B. Adinarayana Rao, SC for Central Govt., ;Mr. G. Raghuram, ;Mr. N. Rama Mohan Rao and ;Mr. N.V.S.J. Rama Rao, Advs.

Ramchandra Sheshgiri Kamath Vs. Janardan Vishwanath Hegde

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11; Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43, 46, 47 and 49; ;Maharashtra Presidency Small Cause Courts (Amendment) Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1969Bom111; (1968)70BOMLR376; ILR1969Bom766

trying the title thereto.6. Extensive amendments were made Chapter VII by the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1963 (Act No.41 of 1963) which came into force on the 28th of November 1963. The first of such … of substance within the limits allowed by law'. It was held by the Privy Council in Hook v. Administrator General 48 Ind App 187= (AIR 1921 PC 11) that the plea of res judicata still remains apart … 1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the

P. Sujanapal Vs. State of Kerala, represented by its Chief Secretary a ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Officer. (d) On 25.4.2013, writ petitioner preferred a complaint to the Registrar General of this Court seeking action against the third respondent judicial officer. In … him. Reliance is placed on the provisions of the Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1850, the Judicial Officers Protection Act, 1963 and the Judges Protection Act, 1985 to contend that even in case of a mistaken or erroneous order, … provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Chapter XXI IPC except on a complaint made by some person aggrieved by … Anu Sivaraman, J. 1. These appeals are against the judgment in a … be with corrupt motives. A Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Khanapuram Gandaiah v. Administrative Officer, Ranga Reddy District Courts and Others. [AIR 2009 AP 174] held that authorities discharging judicial functions are

Firdous Omer (D) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. Bankim Chandra Daw (D) by Lrs. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) - Order 9, Rules 3, 4, 8 and 9 - Order 21 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR2006SC2759; 2007(1)AWC36(SC); [2006(4)JCR84(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC545; (2006)4MLJ1714(SC); RLW2007(1)SC191; 2006(7)SCALE439; (2006)6SCC569

Letters Patent and was hence appealable. This view of the Calcutta High Court had been followed in The Administrative General of West Bengal v. Kumar Purnendu Nath Tagore : AIR1970Cal231 , wherein the Court reiterated, that a … the Limitation Act, which is 30 days from the date of dismissal, under Article 122 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Apparently, under the practice followed in the Calcutta High Court on the Original Side, the order is drawn … trial judge in the special list in terms of Rule 35 of Chapter X of the Original Side Rules.4. Thus, the suit appeared in the … Omer, the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants herein, filed the suit C.S. No. 145 of 1983 in the High Court of Calcutta praying for a declaration

Dr. Sashi Bhushan Acharya and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT169

Charge Officer, Puri dated 3.2.2003 and the letter dated 3.5.2003 of the General Administration Department under Annexures-7 and 8 to the writ application. The averments … Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation of lands Act, 1972 and Rules, 1973, Orissa Revenue Administration (Unit) Act, 1963, Administration of Orissa State Order, 1948, Administration of Mayurbhanj State Order, 1949, Orissa Board of Revenue Rules, 1959 … challenge the proposed Scheme for re-organisation of the Revenue Department vis-a-vis re-organisation of Settlement and Consolidation with Tahasil Administration vide Annexures 2 and 3 to WPC No. 7763 of 2003 and thereafter, further seeking to challenge Resolution … DRC- 33/2003-57938/R dated 6.12.2003 of the Government under Annexure-1 to W.P.(C) No. 13959 of 2003.2. The Petitioners in both the writ applications, inter alia, seek

T.K.Natarajan vs T.K.Raman Achari

Court : Kerala

of the assets of the deceased or a certificate granted under Section 31 or 32 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 with respect to the debt mentioned therein or a Succession Certificate granted under Part X of the Act … assets from being defeated or destroyed either due to efflux of time or otherwise. The provisions incorporated in Chapter VIII and IX of the M.F.A.(Succession) No.143 of 2005 7 Act for that purpose are self explanatory with … HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 14TH MAGHA, 1944 MFA (SUCCESSION) NO. 143 OF 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN