Advanced Search Results
Pundalika Savanna Kaladagi Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Jul-26-2006
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Rules and Regulations, 1995 - Rule 17 and 17(2)
2007(5)KarLJ571; 2007(1)AIRKarR426(DB); ILR2006(4)Kar4548
the view that the writ petitioner's remedy against Annexure-A, order was to approach the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and that the petitioner was not entitled to file the writ petition … learned Single Judge on the ground that it is not maintainable as the petitioner should approach the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal for adjudication of the dispute raised in the writ petition.2. The appellant is a member of the Medical
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Others Vs. Ramesh Kum
Supreme Court of India
Sep-02-1997
Criminal Constitution Service
Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil Service Rules - Rule 151; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389
AIR1997SC3531; JT1997(7)SC645; 1997(5)SCALE660; (1997)7SCC514; [1997]Supp3SCR668; 1997(2)LC661(SC); (1997)3UPLBEC1603
the respondent filed an application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for quashing the order of dismissal and issuing a direction to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Rao and ors. Vs. M.G. Maheshwara Rao and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-27-2007
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 19; Cadre and Recruitment Rules, 1986
2007(6)ALLMR(SC)966; JT2007(10)SC504; 2007(10)SCALE384; 2008(2)SLJ177(SC)
Administrative Tribunal dated 6.7.1994. It is also contended that in any subsequent application filed by the assistants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act (for short 'the Act'), the Administrative Tribunal could not have considered the correctness … partly allowed the writ petition filed before it by the employees in the ministerial cadre of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal. Writ Petition Nos.16143-1646 of 1997 challenged the decision of the Administrative Tribunal dismissing an application filed by them
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shaikh Jabbar Abbas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-09-2002
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19
2002(4)ALLMR734; 2003(2)BomCR159; 2003BomCR(Cri)662; (2003)1BOMLR237; [2003(96)FLR606]; 2003(1)MhLj543
the respondents that petitioner has adequate and efficacious remedy of challenging the order of reversion before the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) under section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short, 'Act of 1985'), we thought it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and ors. Vs. Central Adminis ...
Allahabad
Apr-01-2004
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19
[2004(102)FLR298]; (2004)3UPLBEC2391
and Sri Bhagwan Singh was transferred from Bulandshahar to Gotakha. The aforesaid transferees filed separate original applications under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, challenging their transfers on various grounds.7. The Tribunal vide the impugned order … of by a common order.4. The petitioners feel aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, interfering in the orders transferring the respondent-employees and remitting the matter for reconsideration in the light of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Pushpa Rani and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-29-2008
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Indian Railway Board Act, 1905; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 157 and 158; Central Engineering Service, Class I, Recruitment Rules, 1954; Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954; Indian Railway Medical Services (CMO, Addl. CMO, MS and Div./Sr. MO) Recruitment Rules, 1978; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 16(3), 16(4) and 309; Constitution of India (Seventy-Seventh Amendment) Act
(2008)7MLJ64(SC); 2008(10)SCALE567; (2008)9SCC243; 2009(1)SLJ1(SC); 2008AIRSCW6564; 2008(4)LH(SC)2993
the orders of Punjab & Haryana High Court which upheld the decision of Chandigarh Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as `the Tribunal') to quash para 14 of the said letter and the direction given … the Northern Railway. They were promoted as Senior Clerks and then as Head Clerks. They filed applications under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for quashing the instructions issued by the Railway Board vide letter No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPanicker K.P. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kerala
May-23-2008
Civil
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 226
2008(2)KLJ502
P.N. Ravindran, J.1. The appellant in O.A. No. 765 of 2001 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench is the petitioner and the respondents therein are the respondents in this writ petition. The petitioner … file a fresh application in respect of the same subject matter, the remedy available to the petitioner under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 should be deemed to have been abandoned by him in respect of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Radhakrishna Murthy Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-16-2001
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 19, 22, 28 and 35(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 23, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 323-A
2001(3)ALD330
raises an interesting question as regards interpretation of Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC vis-a-vis the power of the Administrative Tribunal to entertain an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.2. The petitioner before us was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Mohan Rao Vs. A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-27-2001
Service
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1995 - Sections 19; National Leprosy Control Programme Service Rules - Rule 5
2001(3)ALD641; 2001(3)ALT604
with costs quantified at Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only). Service - basis of promotion - Section 19 of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1995 and Rule 5 of National Leprosy Control Programme Service Rules - promotion to be considered on basis
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Samar Kumar Sarkar
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2009
ServiceCivil
Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Government of India Act, 1935; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
2009(4)AWC3215(SC); JT2009(11)SC258; (2009)6MLJ80(SC); 2009(9)SCALE523; 2009(3)SLJ199(SC); 2009(8)LC3702(SC)
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to transfer an application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act pending before the Administrative Tribunal to the High Court for its consideration and decision.3. The facts in nutshell
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »