Advanced Search Results

Dr. R. Kannan Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Rs.30,84,355/-. The demand/recovery notice was issued because as per the respondent no.2 the petitioner was not entitled to actuarial allowance of Rs.65,000/- per month from the date of his appointment on 18.12.2006 till it was paid for … Rs.30,84,355/-. The demand/recovery notice was issued because as per the respondent no.2 the petitioner was not entitled to actuarial allowance of Rs.65,000/- per month from the date of his appointment on 18.12.2006 till it was paid for … the petitioner is a statutory appointment which is made in terms of Section 4 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Act, 1999

Reshma Kumari and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A, 140, 163A, 166 and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Actuaries Act, 2006; Statement of Objects and Reasons to Act, 1994

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC90; RLW2010(1)SC361; 2009(10)SCALE90:2009AIRSCW6999; (2009)13SCC422

have to be met entirely out of the relevant portion of the lump sum.29. The Parliament enacted the Actuaries Act, 2006. However, its activities are little known. We do not know whether any Actuarial Society has come into effect. … and mother of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the Tribunal awarded a sum of … to be 15 years and the multiplicand is shown to be Rs. 3000. The total should be 3000x15=45,000 but the same is worked out at

Union of India Vs. M/S Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats pv ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

providing the services as they cannot be treated as element/components of service. Section 67 was amended by Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. May 01, 2006. Since the cases before us involve period prior to the aforesaid amendment as well … 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). The High Court of Delhi has, by the judgment dated November 30, 2012, accepted the said challenge and declared Rule 5 to be ultra vires these provisions. Other cases have

Western Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Ltd. (Wesco) and Others V ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Land Acquisition

light of the judgment of the Tribunal in Appeal nos. 77 of 2006 and batch and 52 of 2007 and batch and also the findings … Employees Cost (Actuarial valuation of Terminal Benefits) (i) In the impugned Order the Orissa Commission has adopted the actuarial valuation done by the Commission in the year 2009 and projected the requirements of the terminal benefits found … 20.03.2013 passed by the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (in short, Orissa Commission) under Section 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003 in case no. 104 of 2012, 105 of 2012 and 106 of 2012 respectively, inter-alia determining the … No. 104 of 2012, 105 of 2012 and 106 of 2012 dated 30.11.2012 respectively for approval of their Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR) and Retail Supply

Houldsworth and Another (Respondents) Vs. Bridge Trustees Limited and ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the Member's VIP Interest was converted into pension using tables of factors periodically supplied by the Scheme actuaries and (as allowed for by article 8.1.5) paid direct from the Scheme; this is what is referred to … taken an unusual course. They began as Part 8 proceedings commenced in 2006 by Bridge Trustees Ltd ("the Trustee"), the independent corporate trustee of the … respect of him under the scheme which are not money purchase benefits." 30. If (as has happened in this case, if Mr Simmonds is correct) … take the scheme outside the statutory definition of "money purchase benefits" in section 181 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 ("PSA 1993") as applied for the purposes of section 73 of the Pensions Act 1995 ("PA 1995").

Philips Electronics India Limited and anr. Vs. the Workmen of Philips ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 2(S), 10(1) and 12(5); Maharashtra Recognised Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR500; 2007(6)BomCR441; (2007)IILLJ786Bom

compensation. It is also alleged that the company assured the union about replacement of well known firm of Actuaries having long standing and established links with the company. Reference has been made to the promise given in … issue rendered by the Court below vide its order dated 30th September, 2006 is sought to be quashed and set aside. The Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai … by the Court below vide its order dated 30th September, 2006 is sought to be quashed and … the employees concerned in the proceeding are covered under the ambit of 'Workman' as per provisions of I.D. Act? (ii) Whether the grievance made on behalf of the employees is an 'Industrial dispute'? (iii) Whether the second … its order dated 12th April, 2005. Jurisdiction of the State Govt. Under Section 10(1) read with 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short

Free Enterprise Fund Vs. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

cause.” 10 U. S. C. §10505(a)(3)(A) Office Within Department Statutory Removal Provision 32 Department of Defense: Board of Actuaries “A member of the Board may be removed by the Secretary of Defense only for misconduct or failure … periodically published by the Office of Personnel Management and last published in 2006. See 72 Fed. Reg. 16154-16251 (2007); §3132(b)(4). Given the Federal Government’s size … Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, was created as part of a series of accounting reforms in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Board is composed of five members appointed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It was … 200 , 212-213. These considerations point against any limitation on review here. Section 78y provides only for review of Commission action, and petitioners’ challenge is … by the head of such an establishment. Pp. 30-31. (c) The several Commissioners, and not the Chairman,

Conkright Vs. Frommert

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne , 482 U. S. 1 , 11 (1987). Indeed, a group of prominent actuaries tells us that it is impossible even to determine whether an ERISA plan is solvent (a duty imposed … approach that has come to be known as the “phantom account” method. Respondents challenged that method in an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The District Court granted summary judgment for the … complicated. (The one at issue here runs to 81 pages, with 139 sections.) We held in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch , 489 … maximum and minimum limits.” State v. Rubion , 158 Tex. 43, 54-55, 308 S. W. 2d 4, 11 (1957) (citations omitted). While we are “guided

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission a ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

302, Indian Globe Chambers, 142, Fort Street, Off D.N. Road, Fort, Mumbai, incorporated under Section 3 of the Actuaries Act (which was enacted and received assent of the President on 27.8.2006 and was brought into force on 8.11.2006). … in loss levels and therefore their present plea that the targets set were not achievable cannot be considered. 30) As can be seen from Regulations quoted above, the Commission is doing nothing other than enforcing the Regulations.

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Electricity Workers ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

report in respect of the liabilities of the fund as on December 30, 2003. The report was submitted which was considered by the trustees of … unbundled. The amount of the corpus fund advised to be created by SBI Caps was based on the actuarial valuation carried out by M/s.Charan Gupta, an Actuarial Consultancy Service. Under the tripartite agreement the first respondent was … already made in the writ petition and also took into account subsequent facts and that the cause of action embedded in the tripartite agreement dated October 28, 2000 is not altered. The other conclusion is that a … in the writ petition by the writ petitioner is that pursuant to Sections 14 and 15 of the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000, the Delhi