Advanced Search Results

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Etiquettes and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959, Actuaries Act, 2006, Gujarat Professional Civil Engineers Act, 2006, Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, containing provisions for disqualifying a person from … ….Appellant VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh ....Respondent JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and

Reshma Kumari and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A, 140, 163A, 166 and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Actuaries Act, 2006; Statement of Objects and Reasons to Act, 1994

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC90; RLW2010(1)SC361; 2009(10)SCALE90:2009AIRSCW6999; (2009)13SCC422

have to be met entirely out of the relevant portion of the lump sum.29. The Parliament enacted the Actuaries Act, 2006. However, its activities are little known. We do not know whether any Actuarial Society has come into effect. … and mother of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the Tribunal awarded a sum of … appeal by obtaining special leave.Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 21649 of 2006.4. Jagmohan Singh, (deceased), husband of appellant No. 1; father of

Scottish Widows plc (Appellant) Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Re ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

of Session, and now before this Court, creates a risk of getting lost in a labyrinth of abstractions. Actuaries, accountants and lawyers are trying to converse in the same language, but it is not easy going. It … Customs ("the Revenue") as to the tax consequences. 36. On 11 October 2006 the Company and the Revenue joined in making a referral to the … ("the Company") and Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs ("HMRC") under para 31 of Schedule 18 to the Finance Act 1998: [2010] CSIH 47, 2010 SLT 885, 2010 STC 2133. The question that was referred to the Special … form 40 must be taken as falling within the scope of either section 83(2) or section 83(3) of the Finance Act 1989, as substituted by … [2010] CSIH 47, 2010 SLT 885, 2010 STC 2133. The question that was referred to the Special

State of West Bengal Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, … the Regulatory Commissions on the principles acknowledged in the Tariff Regulations. Regulation 21(1)(ii) of the Tariff Regulations, therefore, according to the CERC, should have been

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, … the Regulatory Commissions on the principles acknowledged in the Tariff Regulations. Regulation 21(1)(ii) of the Tariff Regulations, therefore, according to the CERC, should have been

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, … the Regulatory Commissions on the principles acknowledged in the Tariff Regulations. Regulation 21(1)(ii) of the Tariff Regulations, therefore, according to the CERC, should have been

State of Jharkhand Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, … the Regulatory Commissions on the principles acknowledged in the Tariff Regulations. Regulation 21(1)(ii) of the Tariff Regulations, therefore, according to the CERC, should have been

itc Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : The U.P. Urban Planning And Development Act 1973 - Sections 41, 12, 7, 14, 30, 6, 19, 9, 18; Transfer of Property Act 1882 - Section 4; Contract Act - Sections 20, 21

as per the NOIDA Development Area Building Regulations and Directions, 1986 and 2006 (published in the Gazettes dated 01.12.1986 and 05.12.2006 respectively), hotels fall under … subject matter of the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact. Section 21 of Contract Act provides that a contract is not voidable because it was caused by a mistake as … simply taking the aggregate of the `loss' over the future period as today's loss. There are well recognised actuarial methods to calculate the present value of a future loss. In fact, this is clearly recognized by NOIDA

M/S Wipro Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

same having not been expended during the current assessment - 189 - year and the assessee not following actuarial method of accounting?.” [Question of law No.25 in ITA Nos.907 & 909/2008; Question of law No.21 in ITA … on 30.10.2001 disclosing a total income of Rs.135,51,15,000/- after claiming deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act (for short, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) to the extent of Rs.620,17,27,569/-.4. The case for assessment year … of Punjab and others v. Chhabra Rice Mills and others reported in 2006(60) Kar.L.J.222 (SC) held, interpreting Sec.2(i) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act,

S. Sundaram, Vs. Icici Bank Limited Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Banking Regulations Act - Sections 5; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 60; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10; Minimum Wages Act; Factories Act; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21, 31(1) and 226; Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972 - Rule 55A; Bank of Madura Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 9 and 39; Indian Bank Voluntary Employees' Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulation 28

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1119

v. Management and Anr.)(v) : 2005(2)CTC55 (Nadar Sangam v. RBI and Ors.)(vi) 2006 (1) CTC 776 (Nadar Sangam v. RBI and Ors.)(vii) : (2006)11SCC634 (S. … the right to life as envisaged in Article 21. He referred to the following decisions:(i) : (1969)IILLJ479SC … in mind the complexities involved in calculations and the cost impact it is decided to engage a reputed Actuarial Firm to help the Bank in arriving at appropriate decision. It is expected that by the end of … amalgamation of BoM with ICICI came into effect with the sanction of RBI as per the Banking Regulations Act.3. On 29-06-2001, the representatives of BoM Association and ICICI Bank worked out an agreement to facilitate the integration … long service, which cannot be taken away - Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, Section 60(e) 2005 WLR 820 (cited supra)22. When the above consistent ratio of