Advanced Search Results

Houldsworth and Another (Respondents) Vs. Bridge Trustees Limited and ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the Member's VIP Interest was converted into pension using tables of factors periodically supplied by the Scheme actuaries and (as allowed for by article 8.1.5) paid direct from the Scheme; this is what is referred to … taken an unusual course. They began as Part 8 proceedings commenced in 2006 by Bridge Trustees Ltd ("the Trustee"), the independent corporate trustee of the … and (4) the failure of the life office is the only risk. 16. The way in which VIP total contributions were used in practice before … take the scheme outside the statutory definition of "money purchase benefits" in section 181 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 ("PSA 1993") as applied for the purposes of section 73 of the Pensions Act 1995 ("PA 1995").

Scottish Widows plc (Appellant) Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Re ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

of Session, and now before this Court, creates a risk of getting lost in a labyrinth of abstractions. Actuaries, accountants and lawyers are trying to converse in the same language, but it is not easy going. It … Customs ("the Revenue") as to the tax consequences. 36. On 11 October 2006 the Company and the Revenue joined in making a referral to the … that assessment was altered (and the likelihood of its actually being adopted by the Revenue was reduced) by section 16 of the Finance Act 1923 ("FA 1923"), which gave effect to a recommendation in the report, published in

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Etiquettes and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959, Actuaries Act, 2006, Gujarat Professional Civil Engineers Act, 2006, Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, containing provisions for disqualifying a person from … ….Appellant VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh ....Respondent JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and … and threatening a Civil Judge (Senior Division), Etah in his Court on 16.4.2003 and 13.5.2003 and sentenced him to simple imprisonment of two months with

Reshma Kumari and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A, 140, 163A, 166 and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Actuaries Act, 2006; Statement of Objects and Reasons to Act, 1994

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC90; RLW2010(1)SC361; 2009(10)SCALE90:2009AIRSCW6999; (2009)13SCC422

have to be met entirely out of the relevant portion of the lump sum.29. The Parliament enacted the Actuaries Act, 2006. However, its activities are little known. We do not know whether any Actuarial Society has come into effect. … and mother of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the Tribunal awarded a sum of … a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faridabad under Sections 166 and 140 of the 1988 Act for grant of compensation of Rs.

Govt of Delhi and Others Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

302, Indian Globe Chambers, 142, Fort Street, Off D.N. Road, Fort, Mumbai, incorporated under Section 3 of the Actuaries Act (which was enacted and received assent of the President on 27.8.2006 and was brought into force on 8.11.2006). … achieve future manpower reduction but was to ensure retention of the existing force. It was implemented by Section 16(2) of the Act and thus all existing conditions of service would stand included and protected when read with

Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Insilco Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 210A, 211(3A), 211(3B) and 211(3C); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 32, 36, 37, 145(1) and 145(2); Wealth Tax Act; Bonus Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Del)641; [2010]321ITR322(Delhi); [2009]179TAXMAN55(Delhi)

the aforementioned scheme.4.2 Based on the provisions of the scheme, the assessee engaged an Actuary to make an actuarial calculation as regards the provision which it would be required to make in respect of the liability on … 4 months respectively under the aforementioned scheme.4.2 Based on the provisions of the scheme, the assessee engaged an Actuary to make an actuarial calculation as regards the provision which it would be required to make in respect … that as per the Accounting Standards notified by the Central Government Under Section 145(2) of the Act, it was incumbent upon the assessee to make … referred to as the 'Tribunal') in ITA No. 626/Del/2004 and ITA No. 16/Del/2004 filed by the Appellant/Revenue and Respondent/assessee respectively pertaining to assessment year 2000-01.2.

State of West Bengal Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 5 (2010) 4 SCC603[Para 17]. 5 . 16 15. It is on the same basis that the findings of the … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 5 (2010) 4 SCC603[Para 17]. 5 . 16 15. It is on the same basis that the findings of the … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 5 (2010) 4 SCC603[Para 17]. 5 . 16 15. It is on the same basis that the findings of the … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

State of Jharkhand Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission 5 (2010) 4 SCC603[Para 17]. 5 . 16 15. It is on the same basis that the findings of the … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,