Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: actuaries act 2006 section 11 · Page 1 of about 73 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 05 2016

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Etiquettes and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959, Actuaries Act, 2006, Gujarat Professional Civil Engineers Act, 2006, Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, containing provisions for disqualifying a person from … ….Appellant VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh ....Respondent JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and … same before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court and on 11.7.2004, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the High Court referred the matter to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2009

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission a ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Oct-06-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

302, Indian Globe Chambers, 142, Fort Street, Off D.N. Road, Fort, Mumbai, incorporated under Section 3 of the Actuaries Act (which was enacted and received assent of the President on 27.8.2006 and was brought into force on 8.11.2006).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2009

Reshma Kumari and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2009

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A, 140, 163A, 166 and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Actuaries Act, 2006; Statement of Objects and Reasons to Act, 1994

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC90; RLW2010(1)SC361; 2009(10)SCALE90:2009AIRSCW6999; (2009)13SCC422

have to be met entirely out of the relevant portion of the lump sum.29. The Parliament enacted the Actuaries Act, 2006. However, its activities are little known. We do not know whether any Actuarial Society has come into effect. … and mother of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the Tribunal awarded a sum of … claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 30 2014

Telecommunications Employees Association of Manitoba Inc. and Others V ...

Court : Canada Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-30-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the transfer of assets from the Old Plan to the new pension plan would be reviewed by actuaries retained by the employee unions and an actuary retained by MTS, as well as the Old Plans actuary. … for pension plans (A.R., vol. VIII, at p. 39). Between 1997 and 2006, the CANSIM rate was more stable but on average lower than the … for enhancements to their pension benefits 2010 MBQB 11 (CanLII), (2010 MBQB 11, 248 Man. R. (2d) … pension rights transferred to a new pension plan. The assets included a $43.364 million œactuarial surplus?. [2] An actuarial surplus occurs in a typical defined benefit pension trust fund when the assets in the trust fund exceed … 67 ultimately became the Reorg. Act. The Bill provided, in the only section devoted to employee benefits, that plan members would be deemed to consent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2007

thermax Babcock and Wilcox Ltd. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of It, Spl.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-02-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)304ITR130(Pune.)

year 94-95 vide ITA No. 1168/PN/97, consolidated order being dated 17^th March, 2006. The Id counsel for the assessee has also placed reliance on the … 5. The ld CIT (A) erred in confirming addition of Rs. 13,16,256/- being leave encashment provision which was actuarially valued in accordance with the accepted accounting practice and mandatory accounting standard (AS 15) regularly followed by the … the CIT(A)'s order dt 8.1.2001 in the matter of an assessment made Under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the assessment year 97-98. 1. The Id CIT (A) erred … year 94-95, the ITAT vide its order dt 17.3.2006 in ITA No. 1168/PN/97 has decided this issue by directing to exclude 20% of the expenditure.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2015

Govt of Delhi and Others Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-31-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

302, Indian Globe Chambers, 142, Fort Street, Off D.N. Road, Fort, Mumbai, incorporated under Section 3 of the Actuaries Act (which was enacted and received assent of the President on 27.8.2006 and was brought into force on 8.11.2006).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2012

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

States for Medical Assistance Programs. Commonly known as the Medicaid Act, Subchapter XIX filled some 278 pages in 2006. Section 2001 of the ACA would add approximately three pages. [ 19 ]      Congress has broad authority to … lawful commands, but as “incentives.” See 505 U. S., at 152-153, 171-173. 11 Of course, individuals do not have a lawful choice not to pay … IV); Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, C. Truffer et al., 2010 Actuarial Report on the Financial Outlook for Medicaid, p. 20.      Nor will the expansion exorbitantly increase state Medicaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2018

State of West Bengal Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … seem to arise for determination by this Court in exercise of its 11 jurisdiction under Section 125 of the 2003 Act. The same are enumerated … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2018

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … seem to arise for determination by this Court in exercise of its 11 jurisdiction under Section 125 of the 2003 Act. The same are enumerated … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2018

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … seem to arise for determination by this Court in exercise of its 11 jurisdiction under Section 125 of the 2003 Act. The same are enumerated … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial