Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kamala Vs. Sarojini

Decided On : Mar-15-2013

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Hindu Succession Act, Section 15, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 15, Section 15

PERSON: JUDICATURE, R.KARUPPIAH A.3733, Legal Heir, Rajavelu, Sasirekha, Will, R2, Kamala, Velayutham Pillai, Kamala, Rajavelu, Sasirekha, Will, Will, Will, Sarojini, Subramaniam, Rajavelu, Sasirekha, Subramaniam, Will, Subramaniam, Pamela Manmohan Singh, no.12, Subramaniam, Sarojini, R.KARUPPIAH

ORG: MADRAS, R.KARUPPIAH, Rajavelu, Testator, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, MANU/SC/8047/2008, MANU/SC/0160/2010 (Shri Jagjit Singh, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, TOS No.40 of, TOS No.40 of, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 2012, 3734, 2012, 2001, 2011, the year 1956, 26.04.1999, 1999, 1956, 2012, 814 days, 2012, 2012, 2001, 2012, 1999, 814 days, 814 days, 2001, 2001, 3734, 2012, a period of, two weeks, 3734, 2012

CARDINAL: 3735, 02.05.2009, 2.During, one, 02.05.2009, 4.It, two, more than, 1, two, two, 10.Considering, three, 3735, 11.Further, three, four, 13.The, 15.03.2013, 3735

GPE: Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, no.4, Kamala

NORP: Subramanian, Subramanian, Subramanian, Subramanian, Subramanian, Subramanian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

ORDINAL: second, 2nd, 2nd, second, 2nd, second, 2nd

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //