Sumathi Vs. State

Decided On : Mar-05-2013

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 482, Section 91 Cr, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 123, Indian Evidence Act, Section 120-B r/w Sec 8, section 91, Constitution under Article 21, the Investigating Officer, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 123, Section 123&quot, Section 173(5, Article 21, the Evidence Act, Section 207 Cr, Section 123 of the Evidence Act, Section 123 of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

ORG: HONOURABLE, S.PALANIVELU Criminal Original Petition No.31145, The Inspector of Police, CBI ACB, CBI Cases, Chennai, CBI Cases, Regional Passport Office, Chennai, Tatkal, Travels Pvt. Ltd., Fathima, the Regional Passport Office, Travels, the Regional Passport Officer, Fathima, Ahmed World Travels, Rs.2,500/-, A2, Rs.9000/-, A2, Tatkal, Rs.9000/-, the CBI Team, the Regional Passport Office, A2, Fathima, Court, CC, PMO, the Department of Post, the Sanctioning Authority, Court, Court, CBI, CVC, CVC, CVC, the Government of India, State, CBI, CVC, the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Ministry of Personnel, Court, 30.1.2012, the High Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Court, CBI Cases, Chennai, Court, Court, Vigilance Department, Group, Indian Postal Service, Group, A2, Court, Court, Court, Court, Special Public Prosecutor for, CBI Cases, State, Sections 123, State, State, State, 3rd Edition Volume, The Supreme Court, State, Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, earlier Judgment of Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, XXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Criminal Petition, Court, the Apex Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Honourable Supreme Court, Sections 207, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Judgment of this Court, CBI/ACB, the Honourable Supreme Court, Court, Central Government, Vigilance Office, Court, Apex Court, Sections 123, Court, Court, the Criminal Original Petition, CBI Cases, Chennai

DATE: 2012, 2012, 2011, Rs.12,500/-, 4 months ie., between January 2009, April 2009, between Rs.7000/-, 1988, 2011, 2012, 1988, 2005-2009, 29.3.2012, 3733, 2012, 2010, 2011-2, Madras 600104

PERSON: Sumathi Ravichandran, N.R. Elango, M.Krishnamoorthy, N. Chandrasekaran, Chennai:1, Tatkal Provisions, A1, A1, N.R. Elango, N.Chandrasekaran, authorities.8, P. Ramanatha Aiyar's, citizens&quot, Sodhi Sukhdev, V.K. Sasikala, Bangalore, 313 Cr, P.C., Singh v. State rep, Ali, J., S. PALANIVELU, J.ggs Pre-delivery

FAC: IX Additional Special, IX Additional Special, Rs.12,500/-, IX Additional Special, IX Additional Special

GPE: Crl, A2, A2, A2, Rs.15000/-, A2, A2, P.C., India, New Delhi, India, P.C., Sasikala v. State rep, Sidhartha Vashisht v. State, Delhi, P.C.

CARDINAL: one, 22.4.2009, 1.(b, 22.4.2009, 88, 120, 198.and, 1.(d, 114, 124, 2.(c, 239, 17.4.2012, 2:5, 198.and, two, 123, 124, 124, 9, two, 1, 2, 3, evil.&quot, 11, 493.12, 2, 6, 14, 173(5, 124, two, 609, 124

ORDINAL: first

EVENT: "A Privilege