Hartley Vs. Commissioner - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Apr-29-1935

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Revenue Act, Section 402, 1921 Act, Article 343 of Regulation 45, the Treasury Regulations

ORG: Hartley, U.S. Supreme Court, THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, Syllabus, the Board of Tax Appeals, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Court, The Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit, the Circuit Court of Appeals, the Sixth Circuit, the Court of Claims, McCann, Loan & Trust Co., The Court of Claims, Page 295 U. S. 219, Congress, inter vivos, Taft v. Bowers, Helvering v. New York Trust Co., Brewster v. Gage, Treasury Regulation, Art, T.D. 4011, VI-1 Cum, VII-2 Cum, House Committee on Ways and Means, Senate Committee on Finance, Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation, Bankers' Trust Co.

GPE: U.S., United States, pp

DATE: 1935, April 11, 12, April 29, 1935, 1921, 1924, March 1, 1913, 1928, 1918, c. 18, 1057, 1060, the calendar years 1924 and 1925, 1926, 77, April 6, 1927, July 7, 1928, 18

CARDINAL: 295, 602, 1, 2, 202, 3, 72, 352, 294, 27, 952, 217, 136, 42, 227, 229, 204, 234, 43, 253, 258, 31, 924, 930, 62, 180, 38, 915, 51, 145, 48, 446, 214(a)(8, 10, 239, 246, 213, 237, 238, 214, 517, 278, 302, 188, 204(a)(2)(4, 280, 343, 134, 852, 45, 791, 818, 819, 293, 18, 960, 26, 139, 17, 702, 879, 64, 241, 23, 941, 7, 177

PERSON: Hartley v. Commissioner of, Eldredge, McKinney, Elmhirst, Myers, Heiner, Lucas, Alexander, ben, Bull, Art, Cong, Nichols

PRODUCT: Certiorari

NORP: §

PERCENT: 279 U. S. 573, 292 U. S. 455

QUANTITY: 1921 Act

TIME: 62 under the Act of 1921, 62 under the Act of 1924

EVENT: Regulation 69, the 1928 Act