Mccandless Vs. Furlaud

Decided On : Nov-05-1934

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Page 293 U. S. 75

PERSON: McCandless, Booth v. Clark, Frank T. Harrington, Booth v. Clark, Frank T. Harrington, Harrington, Kane v. Paul, Ventress v. Smith, Swan, Booth, Clark, Harris, Booth, Clark, Booth, Clark , Bernheimer v. Converse, Compare Converse, Hamilton, Clark v. Williard, George W. McCandless, Palapala, Henson, McLaughlin, Lacey, Reherd

ORG: U.S. 67, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 67, Syllabus, State, U.S. 617, McCandless, Court, the Duquesne Gas Corporation, Southern New York, the Duquesne Gas Corporation, the Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company, Page 293 U. S. 69 , Southern New York, the District Court, the Kingston Company, the Circuit Court of Appeals, The Court of Appeals, Southern New York, Page 293 U. S. 70 , Complainant against Duquesne Gas Corporation, McCandless, the District Court for, The Court of Appeals, Court, Court, the Court of Appeals, Equity Rule 30, the District Court, McCandless, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, Court, the District Court, C. & L.M. Ry, the District Court, the District Court, the Court of Appeals, Southern New York, Great Western Mining & Mfg, Court, the Court of Appeals, the District Court, McCandless, Court, Court, this District Court, Court, Court, Dahl, Montana Copper Co., Northwestern S.S Co., Cochran, Texas & Pacific Ry, Campbell, Compare Coal & Iron R. Co.

DATE: 1934, 1934, October 11, 1934, November 5, 1934, the 23rd day of March, 1932

PRODUCT: McCandless, McCandless, Certiorari, Thereupon McCandless

CARDINAL: 293, 11, 293, 1, 2, 3, 17, 322, 68, 925, 292, one, three, 217, two, 925, 927, 17, 322, 1, 2, 3, sixty-five, One, 14, 33, 10, 161, 9, 394, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, one, 14, 206, 1, 21, 7, 2, 3, 35, 4, 14, 127, 920, 6, 128, 585, 586, 58, 531, 9, 10, 191, 149, 104, 113, 115, 185, 227, 229, 628, 12, 38, 707, 141, 850, 13, 14, 204

FAC: U.S. 67, St. Louis Southwestern Ry

ORDINAL: first, first, First, first, Second, first, Third, Fourth, fourth

GPE: Pennsylvania, New York, Pennsylvania, Furland, New York, New York, New York, Noonan v., the United States, New York, Mansfield, Pennsylvania, New York, Pennsylvania, the United States, New York, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Buckingham, United States, United States, U.S., Clay County, Leahy, Haworth

LOC: Western Pennsylvania, the Southern District, Western Pennsylvania, the Southern District, the Southern District, the Western District, the Southern District, the District Judge

MONEY: more than $2,500,000, 1,834.640.08, 850,000

WORK_OF_ART: McCandless, McCandless

PERCENT: 224 U. S. 243 , 132 U. S. 264