Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Transit Commission Vs. United States

Decided On : Jan-04-1932

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Transportation Act, the Transportation Act, Division 4

ORG: Transit Commission, U.S. Supreme Court, Transit Commission, Syllabus, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Act, Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Transit Commission, Commission, I.C.C., Court, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Long Island Railroad Company, Page 284 U. S. 365 district court, The Long Island Railroad Company, Whitestone Landing, the Transit Commission, the Transit Commission's, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Interstate Commerce Act, Whitestone Landing, the Transit Commission, Division 4 of the Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State of New York, the Transit Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the State Transit Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Transit Commission, Compare Oregon R. & N. Co., Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, New Orleans Public Service, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, I.C.C. 363, I.C.C. 671, I.C.C.

GPE: United States -, United States, United States, NEW YORK, the United States, New York, New York, Port Washington, the City of New York, Manhattan, Flushing, the City of New York, the City of New York, the City of New York, Manhattan, Colorado, United States, New Orleans, Colorado, United States, U.S., Colorado, United States, Colorado, Colorado

DATE: 1932, 1932, November 24, 25, 1931, January 4, 1932, 1920, January, 1928, 1927, 1928, the first five months of 1929, June 2, 1926, December 31, 1928, December 31, 1928, January 10, 1929, 1920, five months, 120 days, June 17, 1931, 281 U. S. 682, year, Tit 28, 49

CARDINAL: 284, 498, 284, 1, 2, 3, 4, three, 162, 363, 166, 371, 175, 163, 1, five, four, four, twelve, 18, 2, 3, 4, 5, 271, 165, 1, 2, 1, 18, 3, 162, 4, 166, 5, 175, 163

NORP: d., d.

PERSON: JUSTICE ROBERTS, Flushing, Whitestone, Flushing, Fairchild, Tit

PRODUCT: Whitestone

QUANTITY: 4.7 miles, the 4.1 miles

LOC: the Flushing River, Flushing River, the East River

PERCENT: 75 percent, 33 percent, over 26 percent, 4 to 5 percent, only about sixteen percent

MONEY: some $18,000, over $125,000, about $4,000,000, 2,000,000, 37,000, approximately $933,000

ORDINAL: First, Second

FAC: Whitestone

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //