Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Decided On : Jan-04-1932

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, the Interstate Commerce Act, the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, Constitution

GPE: Atchison, United States -, Atchison, United States, Atchison, United States, California, the United States, United States, United States, Michigan, Illinois, Hay, Reduced Rates, Hay, United States

ORG: Topeka & Santa Fe Ry, U.S. Supreme Court, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry, U.S. 248, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry, Syllabus, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Commission, Congress, Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Court, the Interstate Commerce Commission, I.C.C., the Hoch-Smith Resolution, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Page 284 U. S. 255 , Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Western Association of Railway Executives, Page 284 U. S. 256 to the Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Act, Commission, Commission, the Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Hoch-Smith Resolution, Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the District Court, The District Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Act, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Congress, the Interstate Commerce Commission, Congress, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Page 284 U. S. 262 , Commission, Commission, Commission, the Interstate Commerce Act, the Hoch-Smith Resolution, Ann Arbor Railroad Co., Commission, Louisville & Nashville R. Co., Commission, Commission, the District Court, Lakes Superior, Grain, Grain Products, I.C.C. 676, Grain, Grain Products, Kansas Public Utilities Commission, A. T. & S.F., Charges on Grain and Grain Products, I.C.C. 105, Shippers' Protective League v. Southern Pacific Company, I.C.C. 582

CARDINAL: 284, 284, 287, 284, 1, 43, 801, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 51, 510, 254, 1, 164, 619, 173, 511, 2, 51, 510, 3, 4, one, three, 5, 6, 15a, 8, 1(5, 15(1, 1, 2, 47, 3, 120, 801, 4, 17,000, 5, 58, 220, 64, 85, 68, 80, 362, 83, 105, 91, 6, 129, 25, 132, 114

DATE: 1932, 1932, December 3, 4, 1931, January 4, 1932, January 20, 1925, c. 120, September, 1928, February, 1931, 1928, September, 1928, February, 1931, July 1, 1930, April 10, 1931, January 30, 1925, September 22, 1928, July 1, 1929, July 1, 1930, July 1, 1930, October 1, 1930, September, 1930, November, 1930, February 18, 1931, September, 1928, annually, the first eleven months of 1930, 1929, December, 1930, December, 1929, January, 1931, 1930, 1929, 1930, annual, the five preceding years, March 3, 1931, April 10, 1931, June 1, 1931, January 21, 1931, 1920, 1924, that year, annually, February, 1931, September, 1928, September, 1928, 1931, February, 1931, 1928, 1930, annual, the five years, 1928, June 1, 1931, July 1, 1930, 28, 1920, 1922, December 1, 1931

LOC: the Western District, the Western District, the Western District, the Western District, the Western District, the Western District, the Western District, the Mississippi River

PERSON: CHIEF JUSTICE, Tit, I.C.C., Ann Arbor R. Co., House Doc, Cong

NORP: d., §§ 1, d.

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second, 45th

MONEY: less than $20,000,000, over $100,000,000, 20,000,000, over $100,000,000

PERCENT: 14.92 percent, 14.06 percent, 20.98 percent, 12.1 percent, approximately 13 percent

FAC: Resolution, the Hoch-Smith Resolution

TIME: 15 of the Act