Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Leach Vs. Nichols
Decided On : Mar-14-1932
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: the Revenue Act, The Revenue Act, Section 1, Section 6, Section 9, Section 17, section twenty-one
PERSON: Leach, Nichols, William E. Walker, v. Stone, Magee v. Commissioner, Saltonstall
GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Massachusetts, Taunton, Mass., Massachusetts, Massachusetts, the United States, the United States, Massachusetts, Mass.
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE FIRST CIRCUIT Syllabus, McREYNOLDS, Court, The Circuit Court of Appeals, The District Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals, The District Court, the State of Massachusetts, the District Court, Sec, Commonwealth, Commonwealth, New York Trust Co. v. Eisner, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, N.E. 395, Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co., N.E. 729, Coolidge
CARDINAL: 285, 285, 1, 2, 3, 203, 50, 787, 284, 39, 756, 778, 50, 787, 42, 918, 39, 40, 300, 324, 203, 203, 1, 1, 65, 209, 186, 190, 95, 256, 512, 153, 267, 240, 166, 268, 443, 447, 167
MONEY: 468 Argued
DATE: February 23, 1932, March 14, 1932, 1916, November 9, 1918, 1916, September 8, 1916, c. 65, 1916, March 3, 1917, 1000, 1002, October 3, 1917, 1921, one year
ORDINAL: first, first
PRODUCT: Certiorari
PERCENT: 276 U. S. 260