Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Leach Vs. Nichols

Decided On : Mar-14-1932

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Revenue Act, The Revenue Act, Section 1, Section 6, Section 9, Section 17, section twenty-one

PERSON: Leach, Nichols, William E. Walker, v. Stone, Magee v. Commissioner, Saltonstall

GPE: U.S., U.S., U.S., Massachusetts, Taunton, Mass., Massachusetts, Massachusetts, the United States, the United States, Massachusetts, Mass.

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE FIRST CIRCUIT Syllabus, McREYNOLDS, Court, The Circuit Court of Appeals, The District Court, the Circuit Court of Appeals, The District Court, the State of Massachusetts, the District Court, Sec, Commonwealth, Commonwealth, New York Trust Co. v. Eisner, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, N.E. 395, Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co., N.E. 729, Coolidge

CARDINAL: 285, 285, 1, 2, 3, 203, 50, 787, 284, 39, 756, 778, 50, 787, 42, 918, 39, 40, 300, 324, 203, 203, 1, 1, 65, 209, 186, 190, 95, 256, 512, 153, 267, 240, 166, 268, 443, 447, 167

MONEY: 468 Argued

DATE: February 23, 1932, March 14, 1932, 1916, November 9, 1918, 1916, September 8, 1916, c. 65, 1916, March 3, 1917, 1000, 1002, October 3, 1917, 1921, one year

ORDINAL: first, first

PRODUCT: Certiorari

PERCENT: 276 U. S. 260

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //