Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Reichelderfer Vs. Quinn

Decided On : Dec-05-1932

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Constitution, the Fifth Amendment, Section 3, Constitution, the Zoning Act

PERSON: Reichelderfer, Reichelderfer, Reichelderfer v., Quinn, Dougherty, Muhlker, Jackman, Newton, Meyer, Whitney, Fox, Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., Stanwood, Malden, Smith, Bryan, Cheney Bros., Dougherty, Clark v. Providence, Mowry, Wright, Walcott, Armstrong, Whitney, Binghamton, Wilson v. Lambert, Statutes, Warren Bridge, Wilson v. Lambert, Burbank, Thayer, Armstrong, Whitney, Kean, Elizabeth, N.J.Law, N.J.Law, Bauman v. Ross, Wilson v. Lambert, Whitney, Bauman v. Ross, Binghamton, Gibson, Scranton v. Wheeler, Sharp, Douglass, Riverside v. MacLain, Price, Thompson, Cong, Payson

GPE: U.S., Quinn, U.S., U.S., the District of Columbia, the United States, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, Rock Creek Park, D.C., Rock Creek Park, the United States, the United States, the United States, Connecticut, Richmond, New York, Cincinnati, Washington, Newton, D.C., Seattle, East Chicago, New York, United States, the United States, Philadelphia, South Dakota, Newton, Boston, New York, Chicago, Mass., the United States, United States, New York, United States, United States, New York, the District of Columbia, United States, United States, Ill., Id.

DATE: 1932, 1932, October 17, 1932, December 5, 1932, 53 F.2d 1079, 60 App, 53 F.2d 1079, 153 U. S. 380, years, 17, 751, 200 U. S. 22, 283 U. S. 291, 64, 422, 2d ed., some later date, 269 U. S. 411, 24, 1102, 1023, 1109, 2371, 2578-2590, 2580, 3939, 3952, 3953, 5300-5303, 5673, 5902, 5903, 5988, 6163, 10417-10419, 10457, 10458, 10441-10444, today, 3940

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Congress, Congress, Congress, The Rock Creek Park Act, Page 287 U. S. 316 , Congress, D.C. 325, U.S. 535, Court, U.S. 535, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, D.C. 325, the Supreme Court of the District, the District Commissioners, Congress, Congress, Harlem R. Co., Pennsylvania R. Co., the Rock Creek Park Act, Rosenbaum Co., the Rock Creek Park Act, Congress, Congress, Spratley, N.Y. 240, Smith v. Boston, N.E. 702, Louisville & N. R. Co., Compare International News Service, Associated Press, Doris Silk Corp., R.I. 337, R.I. 422, Seattle Land & Improvement Co., Reichling v. Covington Lumber Co., Higginson v. Boston, Brooklyn Park Commissioners, N.Y. 234, East Chicago Co., Eldridge, N.Y. 309, N.E. 462, the Rock Creek Park Act, Court, Charles River Bridge, Knoxville Water Co., Knoxville, Larson, Susquehanna Power Co., State Tax Comm'n, N.Y. 57, Brooklyn Park Commissioners, Union Building Assn, Home for Aged Women v. Commonwealth, Memphis & Charleston Ry, River Rouge Co., Sears v. Street Commissioners, the Rock Creek Park Act, Vogelstein & Co., New River Collieries Co., Whitney v. New York, Eldridge, N.Y. 350, Congress, Greenleaf Lumber Co., Garrison, Richards, Washington Terminal Co., Sheffield & Tuscumbia Street, Co., Rand & Moore, Dillon, Municipal Corporations, Representative Payson

CARDINAL: 287, 9, 287, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 285, 285, 58, 339, 30, 749, 45, 667, 26, 492, 1, 22, 96, 802, 7, 254, 157, 31, 20, 135, 244, 650, 659, 2, 35, 279, 3, 58, 339, 30, 749, 16, 15, 16, 16, 37, 274, 79, 780, 57, 225, 106, 777, 212, 583, 99, 238, 131, 45, 245, 171, 654, 87, 120, 24, 1, 6, 11, 420, 24, 300, 168, 65, 206, 245, 246, 102, 379, 397, 54, 462, 24, 55, 337, 26, 202, 429, 430, 89, 116, 180, 274, 282, 62, 1, 190, 357, 360, 83, 41, 500, 1, 6, 26, 493, 3, 118, 599, 745, 6, 431, 83, 294, 3, 686, 210, 308, 71, 48, 361, 3, 3, 4, 21, 96, 353, 902, 6, a quarter

FAC: Rock Creek Park, N.E. 523, Mass. 432, N.E. 124

PERCENT: 287 U. S. 320 , 172 U. S. 602 , 172 U. S. 82, 279 U. S. 797 , 168 U. S. 611 , 168 U. S. 614

PRODUCT: Certiorari

ORDINAL: first, First, Second, 5th

EVENT: N.E. 291, N.E. 17, N.E. 299

NORP: §, d.

WORK_OF_ART: N.E. 397

MONEY: 1,000, 2,000

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //