Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Reichelderfer Vs. Quinn
Decided On : Dec-05-1932
Court : US Supreme Court
LAW: Constitution, the Fifth Amendment, Section 3, Constitution, the Zoning Act
PERSON: Reichelderfer, Reichelderfer, Reichelderfer v., Quinn, Dougherty, Muhlker, Jackman, Newton, Meyer, Whitney, Fox, Kirk v. Maumee Valley Co., Stanwood, Malden, Smith, Bryan, Cheney Bros., Dougherty, Clark v. Providence, Mowry, Wright, Walcott, Armstrong, Whitney, Binghamton, Wilson v. Lambert, Statutes, Warren Bridge, Wilson v. Lambert, Burbank, Thayer, Armstrong, Whitney, Kean, Elizabeth, N.J.Law, N.J.Law, Bauman v. Ross, Wilson v. Lambert, Whitney, Bauman v. Ross, Binghamton, Gibson, Scranton v. Wheeler, Sharp, Douglass, Riverside v. MacLain, Price, Thompson, Cong, Payson
GPE: U.S., Quinn, U.S., U.S., the District of Columbia, the United States, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, Rock Creek Park, D.C., Rock Creek Park, the United States, the United States, the United States, Connecticut, Richmond, New York, Cincinnati, Washington, Newton, D.C., Seattle, East Chicago, New York, United States, the United States, Philadelphia, South Dakota, Newton, Boston, New York, Chicago, Mass., the United States, United States, New York, United States, United States, New York, the District of Columbia, United States, United States, Ill., Id.
DATE: 1932, 1932, October 17, 1932, December 5, 1932, 53 F.2d 1079, 60 App, 53 F.2d 1079, 153 U. S. 380, years, 17, 751, 200 U. S. 22, 283 U. S. 291, 64, 422, 2d ed., some later date, 269 U. S. 411, 24, 1102, 1023, 1109, 2371, 2578-2590, 2580, 3939, 3952, 3953, 5300-5303, 5673, 5902, 5903, 5988, 6163, 10417-10419, 10457, 10458, 10441-10444, today, 3940
ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Congress, Congress, Congress, The Rock Creek Park Act, Page 287 U. S. 316 , Congress, D.C. 325, U.S. 535, Court, U.S. 535, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, D.C. 325, the Supreme Court of the District, the District Commissioners, Congress, Congress, Harlem R. Co., Pennsylvania R. Co., the Rock Creek Park Act, Rosenbaum Co., the Rock Creek Park Act, Congress, Congress, Spratley, N.Y. 240, Smith v. Boston, N.E. 702, Louisville & N. R. Co., Compare International News Service, Associated Press, Doris Silk Corp., R.I. 337, R.I. 422, Seattle Land & Improvement Co., Reichling v. Covington Lumber Co., Higginson v. Boston, Brooklyn Park Commissioners, N.Y. 234, East Chicago Co., Eldridge, N.Y. 309, N.E. 462, the Rock Creek Park Act, Court, Charles River Bridge, Knoxville Water Co., Knoxville, Larson, Susquehanna Power Co., State Tax Comm'n, N.Y. 57, Brooklyn Park Commissioners, Union Building Assn, Home for Aged Women v. Commonwealth, Memphis & Charleston Ry, River Rouge Co., Sears v. Street Commissioners, the Rock Creek Park Act, Vogelstein & Co., New River Collieries Co., Whitney v. New York, Eldridge, N.Y. 350, Congress, Greenleaf Lumber Co., Garrison, Richards, Washington Terminal Co., Sheffield & Tuscumbia Street, Co., Rand & Moore, Dillon, Municipal Corporations, Representative Payson
CARDINAL: 287, 9, 287, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 285, 285, 58, 339, 30, 749, 45, 667, 26, 492, 1, 22, 96, 802, 7, 254, 157, 31, 20, 135, 244, 650, 659, 2, 35, 279, 3, 58, 339, 30, 749, 16, 15, 16, 16, 37, 274, 79, 780, 57, 225, 106, 777, 212, 583, 99, 238, 131, 45, 245, 171, 654, 87, 120, 24, 1, 6, 11, 420, 24, 300, 168, 65, 206, 245, 246, 102, 379, 397, 54, 462, 24, 55, 337, 26, 202, 429, 430, 89, 116, 180, 274, 282, 62, 1, 190, 357, 360, 83, 41, 500, 1, 6, 26, 493, 3, 118, 599, 745, 6, 431, 83, 294, 3, 686, 210, 308, 71, 48, 361, 3, 3, 4, 21, 96, 353, 902, 6, a quarter
FAC: Rock Creek Park, N.E. 523, Mass. 432, N.E. 124
PERCENT: 287 U. S. 320 , 172 U. S. 602 , 172 U. S. 82, 279 U. S. 797 , 168 U. S. 611 , 168 U. S. 614
PRODUCT: Certiorari
ORDINAL: first, First, Second, 5th
EVENT: N.E. 291, N.E. 17, N.E. 299
NORP: §, d.
WORK_OF_ART: N.E. 397
MONEY: 1,000, 2,000