Weil Vs. Neary - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-02-1929

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Rule 5, the Bankruptcy Act

ORG: Weil v. Neary - 278, U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Court, U.S. 613, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Weil and Thorp, Neary, the supreme court, the District Court, Weil & Thorp, Thompson, Plaintiff, Guggenheim, Untermyer & Marshall, the New York Practice Act, Referee, Campbell, Straitsville Mining Co., Milwaukee & St., Central Vermont R. Co., Sons v. Auto Club of America, District Court, Frick, Weil, Thorp, McLean, Baltimore & Ohio S.W., Chesapeake &amp, O. Canal Co., Hill, Curtis v. Gokey, N.Y. 57, Budweiser Brewing Co., N.Y. 384, the Circuit Court of Appeals of, the Third Circuit, Kaufman, Rio Grande Irrigation Co., D.C. 363, Wilkinson Page, Advance Vencer & Lumber Co., Providence Tool Co., Norris, 2 Wall, Woodstock Iron Co., Richmond Extension Co., Winchester Arms Co., N.Y. 348

GPE: U.S., New York, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, the United States, Esq, United States, Chicago, New York L. Insurance Co., Piedmont, N.Y., Kaufman, Mass., D.C., Conn.

DATE: 1929, October 26, 1928, January 2, 1929, May, 1921, July 18, 1919, May 10, 1924, November 15, 1920, 224 U. S. 99, 103 U. S. 90, 1915, January, 1915, August, 1917, Sepember 10, 1917, October 17, 1917, the 18th, October 18th, September 3, 1918,, July 2, 1919, July 1, 1919, June 1, 1920, October 27, 1920, November 30, 1920, Rule 5, 1898, 9586, Ind. 34, Horaday, three years ago

CARDINAL: 278, 59, 1, 649, 2, 3, 4, 893, 276, one, three, seven, 700, 5, 709, 199, 15, 94, 68, 300, 24, 82, 163, 86, 387, 248, One, 249, 512, 18, 547, 550, 39, 367, 292, 158, 49, 83, two, 42, 45, 103, 641, 48, 217

PERSON: Stats, Untermyer, CHIEF JUSTICE, Samuel Untermyer, A. Leo Weil, Charles M. Thorp, Josiah V. Thompson, Allan Wardwell, Shipman, Paul Ry, Clark, Boogher, Paine v., David Lupton, Young, Frick, Hobbs, Valdes v. Larrinaga, Steele, Ormes v. Dauchy, Shedlinsky, Lorillard v. Clyde, Weil, W. J. Robertson's, Kaufman, Thompson, Hatch, Roth, Murphy, Gould, Whitaker v. Lankford, Meguire v. Corwine, Connolly, Richardson v. Crandall, Palmbaum

PRODUCT: Certiorari, 439

MONEY: more than $70,000, millions of dollars, 5,000, 57,064, many million dollars, more than $142,000, 30,500, 45,466, 68,093, 21,000, later $23,000, 23,000, 300

LOC: the Southern District, the Western District

NORP: §, quam, Oscanyan

PERCENT: 178 U. S. 353, 118 U. S. 152, 90 to 95 percent, 60 percent, the remaining 40 percent, 40 percent, 90 percent, 174 U. S. 603, 101 U. S. 108