Sunil Kumar Vs. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Oct-03-2012

Court: Delhi

LAW: the CRPF Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India the High Court, Article 226 of Constitution of India, the Constitutional Bench, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311(2

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 1, 16-4-1998, 28-8-98, 3, three, 4., four, two, 5, two, two, 6., 8, 9, 10, 3, 4, 422, 11, one, 12, 13, 14, one, 8, 656, 15, 16, opportunity.&#8221, 17, opportunity.&#8221, 18, opportunity.&#8221, 19, 20, two, 21, 22, one, one, two, 23, 2, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 2, one, two, two, two, five, 30

DATE: six days, April 16, 1998, April 23, 1998, May 03, 1998, May 04, 1999, June 22, 1998, August 28, 1998, September 23, 1998, 1949, six days, six days, April 23, 1998, August 28, 1998, the 30th day, November 21, 1998, 127 days, 33 days, 54 days, January 30, 1999, January 30, 1999, May 11, 1999, August 04, 1999, January 30, 1999, May 11, 1999, August 04, 1999, 2010, May 2, 2011, 127 days, 2007, 1963, 1976, 1963, 1976, 1976, 1976, the year 1994, the year 1997, the year 1995, the year 1996, four years‟service, 31

ORG: Constable with Central Reserve Police Force, the Commandant of the concerned battalion, Central Para Military Force, Constable, Commandant, the Court of the concerned, Magistrate, CRPF Battalion, CRPF, U/S 11(1, the Disciplinary Authority, No.943321972 Ct, CRPF, Revision, the Disciplinary Authority, Appellate Authority, the Revisional Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Revisional Authority, Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, Indu Bhushan Dwivedi v State of Jharkhand and Ors, WP(C, Singh v Union of India, Court, an Appellate Authority, Judicial, an Appellate Authority, III Courts, the High Court, Appellate, Revisional Authorities, Appellate, Revisional Authorities, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, AIR 1964 SC 506 State of Mysore v K. Manche Gowda, State, under:- &#, State, under:- &#, State, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court observed:- &, Government, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, the Registrar General, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, un, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, CRPF, CRPF

MONEY: 8220;ARTICLE, 8220;3, 8220;I, 8211, 8211, 8220;It

PERSON: No.943321972 Ct, Sunil Kumar, B/119 Bn, B/119 Bn, Sunil Kumar, B/119 Bn, Sunil Kumar, B/119 Bn, Emphasis Supplied, Tahir Ali, of:-

QUANTITY: 127 days&#8221

PRODUCT: Coy, Coy

LOC: Coy

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second, first, third

NORP: Indu, Indu

FAC: Manche Gowda‟s

GPE: Manche Gowda‟s, Manche Gowda‟s, Mohd

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India