Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Manoj Kumar Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, I.P. Estate, New Delhi and Another

Decided On : Feb-14-2012

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

LAW: the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 304-A, section 207, the Motor Vehicle Act, Section 304-A.

PERSON: Veena Chhotray, Shri Ajesh Luthra and, P.S. Sadar, Haryana, P.S. Sadar, Haryana, P.S. Sadar, Haryana, Sushil Kumar, Daya Shankar Yadav, Kulbir Singh vs GNCTD, Anr, Bench, Anr, Bench, Anr, Anr, Robin Singh, Mahesh Dahiya vs, Anr, Sanjeev Kumar vs GNCTD, Sanjeev Kumar vs GNCTD, Bench, Shri Jai Singh, Jai Singh, Ram Mehar, Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar vs GNCTD

CARDINAL: 1, 3.2.2011, 2, 3., three, 30.8.2010, 3.12.2011, 4, three, 279/337, 2, 279/337/338, three, one, three, three, three, 5., 5.1, 5.2, three, 6., 6.1, 11, 605, 8, 9, 26.2.2010, 28.11.2005, 9.1, 9.2, 8.2.2012, 9.3, 10.9.2010, 9, 10, 10, 21.4.2010, 10.9.2010, 26.4.2011, 11.8.2011, 10.1, 8, two, two, one, 9.6.2, two, 11, 11.1, one, 11.2, 279, 337, 338, 304A, four, 11.3, 279, 337, 338, one, 11.3.1, 161, 4., 11.3.2, two, 11.3.3, 12, One, 13, 14., three, two, One

ORG: Delhi Police, Show Cause Notice, Annex, Tribunal, Delhi Police, Application, the Attestation Forms, the Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, the Show Cause Notice, IPC, Gohana, Gohana, Gohana, FIR, FIR, the Show Cause Notice, the Screening Committee, Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, Ground &, Ground &, DCP, the Screening Committee, inter alia, Screening Committee, the Commissioner of Police, DCP, the Appointing Authority, Sub-Inspector, Show Cause Notice, Delhi Police, Tribunal, the High Court, Delhi Administration, Union of India and Ors, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Delhi High Court, Ors, the Central Administrative Tribunal, perfunctorey, a Trial Court, inter alia, Apex Court, State, Delhi Police, OA No.1642/2009, GNCTD, WP, IPC, Tribunal, the High Court, Mahesh, observations:- &, IPC, FIR, FIR, IPC, Vikas, Vikas, Court, Delhi High Court, Mahesh, IPC, Damayanti, General Hospital, Court, costs.&#8221, Court, Delhi High Court, Tribunal, Respondents, the Appointing Authority, the Apex Court

GPE: OA, Delhi, OA, Sonepat, Sonepat, OA, Apex, Govt, Delhi, OA, Delhi, Sudeep, OA, Apex, Daya Shankar, Daya Shankar, OA, WP, Govt, Delhi, OA, Mahesh Dahiya, OA, WP, Sonepat, the Delhi Police, OA, Delhi, Delhi, OA

DATE: 16.8.2010, the years 2007-2010, 16.8.2010, 08.10.2006, 24.05.2007. 3, 1996, 23.7.2008, 2255/2009, 12.11.2009., 25.10.2010, 2068/2010, 8.2.2012, 12.12.2009, 3.12.2007, 18.10.2006, 20.4.2009, 5782/2011

MONEY: 8220;1, 8216;Y&#8217, 8220;On, 8216;which, 8220;9.6.1, 8220;We, 8220;3

FAC: Shri Amit Anand, the Delhi Police, the Delhi Police, the Delhi Police, the Delhi Police, Sharadanand, Shardanand

EVENT: the OA 2939/2009

LOC: Sushil Kumar’s

PRODUCT: against.&#8221, Sanjeev, Sanjeev

TIME: about 8.30 PM, the evening

ORDINAL: third

NORP: Harbans

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //