Heisler Vs. Thomas Colliery Co. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-27-1922

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Fourteenth Amendment, Page 260 U. S. 254, Page 260 U. S. 256, Page 260 U. S. 259, Page 260 U. S. 260, Constitution

ORG: Heisler, U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Syllabus, Coe v. Errol, the Supreme Court, the Colliery Company, Court, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, General Assembly, P.L. 639, Commonwealth, Alden Coal Co., St. Clair, the Thomas Colliery Company, the supreme court, Bell, Gap Railroad Co., Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., Crescent Oil Co., Mississippi, Susquehanna Coal Co., General Oil Co., United Mine Workers, Coronado Coal Co., the Congress of the United States, the Canadian Parliament

CARDINAL: 260, 541, 1, 2, two, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 274, 253, 639, 251, one, one-half, 1 1/2, 237, 150, nine, sixty-seven, twenty-four, 258, only nine, One

DATE: 1922, November 14, 15, 1922, November 27, 1922, 1913, 1921, P.L. 1921, 220 U. S. 61

PRODUCT: Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.

PERSON: Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Company No, McKENNA, Samuel L. Lewis, Charles A. Snyder, Watson, Coe, Cornell

GPE: Pennsylvania, St. 448, the United States, the State of Pennsylvania, California, Massachusetts, South Amboy, Bacon

PERCENT: 2 1/2 percent, 80%, 228 U. S. 665, 259 U. S. 344

LOC: Pa. 134, Pa. 159, South, West

ORDINAL: first