Semantic Analysis by spaCy
V.K.V. Sarma Vs. Ms. Indra Sarma
Decided On : Aug-12-2011
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 2, Section 2, Section 2
ORG: CRL.RP, U/S. 397 Cr, CMM, the Protection of Women, Nice Company, the Apex Court, Velusamy Vs D. Patchaimmal, AIR SCW 6731, the expression ‘a, the expression ‘domestic relationship’, the expression &#, The Apex Court, Velusamy Vs Patchaiammal, AIR SCW 6731, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Parliament, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court
PERSON: 10.6.2010, Beauty Parlor, Sri, Sunil S. Rao, Sri, Manivannan, Sri, Manivannan, Further
GPE: CRL.A.No, Bangalore City, Bangalore City, Nagarbavi
DATE: 674/2009, 21.7.2009, 18,000/- per month, 1,50,000/- per month, 1993, 18,000/- per month, several years, 2010, several years, several years, 2005
CARDINAL: 1, 12, 2., 12, two, 12, 3, 4., 5., 6., two, 8, 33, 9, 10, 11, two, one, two, 12, two, 13, para.33, 14, 34, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
QUANTITY: 3 acres
MONEY: 8216;domestic, 8216;domestic, 8216;domestic, 8216;a, a &#, 8216;domestic, 8216;domestic
TIME: one night
WORK_OF_ART: Velusamy’s Case
PRODUCT: Velusamy’s