Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Heitmuller Vs. Stokes

Decided On : May-16-1921

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: Rule 19, Rule 19

PERSON: Heitmuller, Heitmuller, Heitmuller, Anna Heitmuller, Anna Heitmuller, Stokes, Stokes, Stokes, appellee, Mills, Lord v. Veazie

CARDINAL: 256, 256, 279, 256, 391, 266, 49, 391, 40, 593, 1, 2, 3, 8, 251

DATE: 1921, 1921, April 21, 22, 1921, May 16, 1921, 1505, January 5, 1920, January 15, 1920, February 5, 1920

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. 359, Syllabus, Court, Court, Page 256 U. S. 360 , Court, Northwest, the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, The Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, the Supreme Court, Court, Saulsbury, the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals of the District, the Supreme Court, Court, the Court of Appeals, The Court of Appeals, Court, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Hamburg-American Co., Court, Hamburg-American Co., the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia

GPE: the District of Columbia, the City of, Washington, D.C., the District of Columbia, California, United States, United States

PERCENT: 239 U. S. 476

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //