Sellappan and Another Vs. Hari and Another - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-07-2012

Court: Chennai

ORG: the Judgment and Decree, Additional Sub Judge, the Judgment and Decree, Additional Sub Judge, Respondent Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mosaic Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, Advocate, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Honourable Supreme Court, National Insurance Co. Limited, The Honourable Supreme Court, DTC, Tribunal, Private Mosaic Company, Tribunal, Rs.1500/-, Respondent/Insurance Company

DATE: 28/1990, 28/1990, 4.10.1988, about 35 years old, monthly, about 27 years old, monthly, Rs.46,000/-, 9.11.1987, only 1 years, 2012-ACJ-1428, 2009, monthly, 40 years old, 35 years old, 50 years, Rs.10,000/-, 20 years old, monthly, the year 1995, monthly, 50 years old, Rs.10,000/-, MCOP.No.28/1990., a period of, eight weeks, the 1st

PERSON: Chengalput, Devanandan, Purushothaman, M.Pudupakkam, Rs.1,50,000/-, Sarla Verma Vs, Rs.3,12,000/-

CARDINAL: 1, 2, Rs.5, 3., 4., 10, 5, 10, Rs.36,000/-, 6, 8., 9, 10, 1/3rd, 13, 11, 1/3rd, 13, 12, Rs.46,000/-, three, one, seventy one thousand

TIME: 6. a.m., Rs.3000/- p.m.

LOC: Madras, Respondent, Respondent

GPE: MCOP.No.27/1990, MCOP.No.27/1990, MCOP.No.27/1990, p.a., MCOP.No.27/1990, p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a.

ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, 2nd

PRODUCT: Rs.60,000/-

MONEY: 7.5 per cent, 7.5 per cent, 7.5 per cent, 7.5 per cent

PERCENT: 7.5%