Ftc Vs. Gratz - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-07-1920

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Section 4, Section 5, the Clayton Act, section 5, The Clayton Act

ORG: FTC, Gratz, U.S. 421, U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, the Federal Trade Commission Act, McREYNOLDS, Court, Congress, the Federal Trade Commission, the Supreme Court, American Manufacturing Company's, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, purchaser, the American Manufacturing Page, Federal Trade Commission, Copartners Doing Business, Warren, Jones & Gratz, The Federal Trade Commission, P. P. Williams & Co., a Federal Trade Commission, State, the Carnegie Steel Company of Pittsburgh, the American Manufacturing Company, the Carnegie Steel Company, Colgate, Son, Inc., the Second Circuit, the Interstate Commerce Commission, United States Leather Co., Southern Ry., I.C.C. 323, Clinton Sugar Refining Co., C. & N.W., I.C.C. 364, Draft Milling Co., I.C.C. 623, R. Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Louisville & Nashville R. Co., Texas &amp, Hamilton & Dayton Ry, Co., Pennsylvania Co., Page 253 U. S. 433, the Federal Bureau of Corporations, the United States Steel Corporation, Standard Oil Co., American Tobacco Co., The Federal Trade Commission Act, the Trade Commission, the Bureau of Corporations, Standard Oil, the Anti-Trust Act, Texas & Pacific Railway v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Compare Interstate Commerce Commission, Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., Commonwealth, the American Tobacco Company, The Carnegie Steel Company, The American Manufacturing Company, the Carnegie Company's, the American Manufacturing Company's, the Carnegie Company, Page 253 U. S. 442, Senate Committee on Interstate Commerce, Sixty-Third Congress, the House Committee, Trust Laws and Unfair Competition (Federal) Bureau of Corporations, H.B. Reed

CARDINAL: 253, 492, 311, 38, 717, 258, 240, 6, 7, two, 3, 730, one, 2, six, Thirty-five, 400, 21, 324, 28, 367, 31, 624, 168, 138, 187, 878, 162, 197, 215, 142, 1, 06, 5, 9, rewoven, 10, 478, 188, 229, 191, 44, 336, 12, fourteen, 371, 429, 13, 597, 4, 283, 51

DATE: 1920, April 20, 21, 1920, June 7, 1920, Sept. 26, 1914, more than a year, September 26, 1914, at least thirty days, under § 5, June 4, 1917, October 15, 1914, under § 5, 252 U. S. 85, the year 1914, as early as 1889, 1890, Between 1906 and 1913, 1911, Oct. 15, 1914, a quarter of century earlier, as early as 1901, 545, 1918, June 13, 1914, January 10, 1914, March 15, 1915, Quarterly (1914, 1916, 1907, 11455

GPE: U.S., the United States, the District of Columbia, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvania, St. Louis, the City of Vicksburg, Mississippi, the City of New Orleans, Louisiana, Vicksburg, New Orleans, United States, MR, New York Central, Cincinnati, America, Massachusetts, Mass.

LOC: the District of Columbia, Pacific Ry, Mississippi

ORDINAL: first, second, First, Second, Third, Fourth

PERSON: c. 323, Anderson Gratz, Benjamin Gratz, P. Williams, W. H. Fitzhugh, Alex, Charles O. Elmer, P. P. Williams, P. P. Williams & Co., C. O. Elmer, A. Schrader's, Dickerson, Sherman, Strauss, Compare People v. Duke, Clerk, Nathan B. Williams, William S. Stevens, William Z. Ripley, Cummins, Cong

QUANTITY: six yards

PERCENT: 206 U. S., 236 U. S. 351, 145 U. S. 263, about 45 percent, about 20 percent, the remaining 35 percent

NORP: American

EVENT: the Sixty-Third Congress

WORK_OF_ART: Unfair Competition, The Morals of Monopoly and Competition