Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Heald Vs. District of Columbia

Decided On : Nov-08-1920

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: the Constitution of the United States, Section 9

GPE: Heald v. District, U.S., U.S., U.S., the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, the United States, the United States, the District of Columbia, Smoot, United States, United States, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia, the District of Columbia

DATE: 1920, 1920, October 18, 1920, November 8, 1920, third and sixth, 223 U. S. 501, March 3, 1917, 1046

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, The Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Court, Court, the Court of Appeals, Congress, American Security & Trust Co., District of Columbia, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, Congress, Congress, Court, Court, Court, Court, American Security & Trust Co., District of Columbia, Court, Congress, the American Security, United Surety Co., American Fruit Co., Congress, Pacific Coast S.S. Co., Louisville Cement Co., Interstate Commerce Commission, Congress, Congress, Barber Asphalt Paving Co., Michigan Central R. Co., Vreeland, Singer Sewing Machine Co., Congress

PERSON: Heald v. District, Heald v. District, Arant v. Lane, CHIEF JUSTICE, Arant v. Lane, Latimer v. United States, Anderson, Field, Williamson, Wilson, Brickell

CARDINAL: 254, 300, 254, 251, 250, 250, 250, 250, 6, 250, two, 250, 199, 1, 39, 2, 3

ORDINAL: third, third

PERCENT: 224 U. S. 491 , 224 U. S. 491 , 170 U. S. 45 , 246 U. S. 638 , 194 U. S. 618

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //