Lane Vs. Hoglund - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-21-1917

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: Section 7 of the Act of March 3, 1891

PERSON: Lane, Lane v. Hoglund, VAN DEVANTER, Svan Hoglund, Mertie C. Traganza, Jacob A. Harris, George Judicak, Joseph Crowther, Kendall, Roberts, Garfield, Ballinger

CARDINAL: 244, 26, 310, 34, three, 42, 43, 12, 179, 13, thousands, 40, 294, 322, 524, 182

GPE: U.S., D.C., the United States, California, United States, United States v.

DATE: 1917, April 11, 1917, May 21, 1917, c. 56, 1095, 1099, two years, two-year, 44 App, D.C. 310, c. 561, 1095, 1099, 1902, 1905, 3001, August 6, 1907, May 29, 1909, June, 1902, four or five months, April 19, 1910, that day, almost three years, May 8, 1891, the two years, July 1, 1891, the period of two years, November 17, 1911, the lapse of two years, December 13, 1913, several years preceding 1891, 187 U. S. 94

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, Syllabus, Interior, a National Forest, the General Land Office, Court, the Court of Appeals, Hoglund, L.D. 405, L.D. 538 and 540, the Land Department, L.D. 1, L.D. 300, Department, L.D. 611, Senate, House of Representatives, Congress, Traganza, L.D. 246, Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad Co., American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty

TIME: 7 of the Act of March 3, 1891

ORDINAL: first

FAC: the Eureka Land District, L.D. 450

QUANTITY: three acres

PERCENT: 102 U. S. 378, 147 U. S. 165