Saraswathy Vs. Babu

Decided On : Dec-13-2011

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 19,20, Section 18, Section 498(A, Section 4, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 18 of the Act, section 18 and 19, Section 31 of the Act, Article 20(1, The Domestic Violence Act, the Domestic Violence Act, the Domestic Violence Act, Section 31, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 31, Section 2(f, Section 17 of the Act, Section 2(f, Section 17, Section 17, Section 2(f, Article

ORG: V Additional Sessions, Chennai, the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, The Protection of Women, Magistrate, Domestic Violence, Magistrate, Appellate, Domestic Violence, I.P.C, Magistrate, Appellate, District Munsif, Magistrate, Appellate, the Protection of Women, the Protection of Women, Crl, State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors, Respondent, Court, PLR 1, Madras High Court, Crl, W.P., Bombay High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Statement of Objects, these High Courts, the Protection of Women, the Protection of Women, the Protection of Women, Magistrate, Sections 12, the Calcutta High Court, Nityananda Das @, State, T. Srikanth, CTC, the “shared household&rdquo, “domestic relationship&rdquo, 7.2.2007, 7.2.2007, A.I.R., SC, Parliament, Court, State of Mysore, SC, Legislature

GPE: C.A.No.339/2008, Crl, Adi, India, Andhra, West Bengal, Vandhana

DATE: 21.10.2010, four months, ten days, three days, the month, four months, 2008, 2008, 2010, 2005, 2005, 2005, 2010, 2009, 18th July, 2009, 2005, 2005, 2005, 18, 19, 20, 21, 2005, 2007, the month of Aadi, a single day, 7.2.2007, 13.6.2007, 1954, 1958

CARDINAL: 22, 17.02.2000, 21.06.2000, 2, 1, more than one, 3, 4., 2, 389, 8, 1, 37, 26-11-2006, 26-11-2006, 26-11-2006, 38, 25-10-2006, 158, 15, 252, 2 102/2008, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 5, 6, one, 5, 679, 20, 2(f, 2(s, 17, 2(f, 2(s

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, first, first, first

PERSON: Ambattur, S.Sankar, P.H.Pandian, P.Rathnavel, Dennison Paulraj, Mayawinola, Mohit Yadam, Anr, Savita Bhanot, V.D. Bhanot, Maya, Reasons, Karimkhan, Bulu Das v Ratan Das, lived&rdquo, significance.” In Rananjaya Singh v., Baijnath Singh, Venkatramana Devaru

LOC: CDJ 2011

PRODUCT: 992, 749

NORP: Krishnamachari