Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Eveneet Singh Vs. Prashant Chaudhari and anr.
Decided On : Nov-08-2011
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 2(s, the Matrimonial Homes Act, Section 2(s, Section 19 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, section 1 of Section 19, Section 10 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act
CARDINAL: 1, 48, 49, half
ORG: Court, FAO(OS, Shumita, Single Bench, the Madras High Court, Venkatesh Kandayammal, Padmavathi, the Supreme Court, Single Bench, Bench, the Supreme Court, the Central Cabinet, The Protection of Women, barsati, House, House, Court, Court, FAO(OS, Hyderabad
PERSON: Sanjay Singh Sandhu &, Komalam Amma, Mangat Mal
GPE: S.Prabhakaran, England, India, New Delhi, CS(OS, CS(OS, New Delhi
LOC: S.R.Batra, S.R.Batra, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single
DATE: 1967, 20.12.2010, 2005, a few months, monthly, monthly, 45,000/- per month
ORDINAL: second, second
NORP: decide.4
PRODUCT: Single
PERCENT: about 20%