Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Eveneet Singh Vs. Prashant Chaudhari and anr.

Decided On : Nov-08-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 2(s, the Matrimonial Homes Act, Section 2(s, Section 19 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act, Section 26 of the Act, section 1 of Section 19, Section 10 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act, Section 19 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, 48, 49, half

ORG: Court, FAO(OS, Shumita, Single Bench, the Madras High Court, Venkatesh Kandayammal, Padmavathi, the Supreme Court, Single Bench, Bench, the Supreme Court, the Central Cabinet, The Protection of Women, barsati, House, House, Court, Court, FAO(OS, Hyderabad

PERSON: Sanjay Singh Sandhu &, Komalam Amma, Mangat Mal

GPE: S.Prabhakaran, England, India, New Delhi, CS(OS, CS(OS, New Delhi

LOC: S.R.Batra, S.R.Batra, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single

DATE: 1967, 20.12.2010, 2005, a few months, monthly, monthly, 45,000/- per month

ORDINAL: second, second

NORP: decide.4

PRODUCT: Single

PERCENT: about 20%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //