Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajesh Kumar Vs. State

Decided On : Aug-30-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 304A IPC, Section 279 IPC, Section 133 Motor Vehicle Act, Section 133 Motor Vehicle Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 304A IPC, Section 304-A IPC, Section 4, the PO Act, Offender Act

CARDINAL: 1, 20,000/-, 500/-, 2, one, 28, two, 3, 4., 5., One, one, 50-100, approximately 30, 6., 8. In, 5, 1, One, 13, one, 9

ORG: Revision Petition, Additional Sessions, Additional Sessions, Rigorous Imprisonment, Simple Imprisonment, IPC, the Petitioner under Section 313 Cr, the Learned Trial Court, the Learned ACMM, the Learned Additional Sessions, the Learned ACMM, Learned Additional Sessions, Additional Sessions, The Trial Court, the Police Station, Additional Sessions, SI Balram, Constable Anil Kumar, the State Government, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court

DATE: 28th February, 2011, 17th August, 2011, 20th August, 2010, one year, one month, three months, 15 days, 2nd April, 2000, February, 2011, ten years, 2nd April, 2000, 82

WORK_OF_ART: Rigorous Imprisonment

TIME: about 9.00 p.m.

FAC: Purana Najafgarh Road

PERSON: Harizan Basti, PW5 Balbir Singh, PW5 Shri Balbir Sharma, Harijan Basti, Palam Gaon, Palam Gaon, Singh, Shyam Lal

GPE: Palam Village, New Delhi, P.C., PW5, Johar, Dalbir, Singh v. State of Haryana, 2000, India

NORP: Satish, Satish, Satish

EVENT: PW 10

PRODUCT: Appellant

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //